Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

It's too long to reply to this morning, and I empathise with a lot of what you say. However, the plural of anecdote is not data, and we have to govern for all.
There are also a number of assertions you make which are not backed up - more driven by emotion. It's not that emotion isn't necessary or commendable, just that it doesn't make good policy.
I will come back to it in good time.
:hmm:
 
He's a socialist like Hillary Clinton is a socialist

edit: he loves Blair so he may actually believe that the Clinton plutocrats are socialists.

Note how he still has NO answer as to what distinguishes Kendall from your bog standard Tory.

 
Yes.

I now expect to be attacked for not being your type of socialist or not having the correct line on whatever - i.e. for how we achieve social justice and greater equality rather than if we achieve it at all.

I think you'll be attacked (mildly rebuked and abused over the internet actually) for your arrogance, your sense of entitlement and your lack of any underpinning values beyond the desire to 'win' (where winning is defined so narrowly that the contest is becoming irrelevant to an increasing number of people).

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
Yes.

I now expect to be attacked for not being your type of socialist or not having the correct line on whatever - i.e. for how we achieve social justice and greater equality rather than if we achieve it at all.

What do you consider to be my type of socialist?
 
It's too long to reply to this morning, and I empathise with a lot of what you say. However, the plural of anecdote is not data, and we have to govern for all.
There are also a number of assertions you make which are not backed up - more driven by emotion. It's not that emotion isn't necessary or commendable, just that it doesn't make good policy.
I will come back to it in good time.

'I understand your concerns but what you've got to bear in mind is that you're wrong, we're right, and we're not going to do anything about them because that would be unrealistic. Now vote for us because Tories.':facepalm:
 
I watched that newsnight labour leadership programme .

I respect Jeremy Corbyn because he is a v good MP and his politics are real because he takes the experiences of his constituents seriously - the other 3 too conscious of their media training which made them all seem patronising and contrived and unreal -

Labour Party is a farce - it's all about media promotion and these people don't know anyone ordinary -
And it's no longer 'the party of labour 'but the party of bleeding middle management -
In bed with the bosses
 
Surely the question is what he thinks "socialist" means. How much of this do you agree with AC14?

You will not be able to extricate any kind of thought from him beyond name calling, pouting about others calling him names and other similar tantrums. There is no actual ideology here beyond the acquistion of power on the backs of people who are principled while denouncing and punishing them for being so naive as to have principles in the first place.
 
Talking nonsense and setting up straw men.

To be a straw man it would need to be a representation of your argument. I'm sure what I said isn't what you think you're saying and I'm not trying to say it is.

It wasn't that though - it was about your attitude and the party's attitude which absolutely reeks of 'we're right, you're wrong and we're not listening to you.'
 
It's too long to reply to this morning, and I empathise with a lot of what you say. However, the plural of anecdote is not data, and we have to govern for all.
There are also a number of assertions you make which are not backed up - more driven by emotion. It's not that emotion isn't necessary or commendable, just that it doesn't make good policy.
I will come back to it in good time.

Sure you will.
 
You will not be able to extricate any kind of thought from him... there is no actual ideology here

He's certainly dodged every effort to get him to express a view beyond "Labour needs to be less left-wing" so far, but everyone has an ideology, and he says his is socialism, so I'm curious to see what he thinks that means. It'd go a long way to furthering the discussion he claims to be asking for if he makes it clear what he wants to achieve.
 
It's too long to reply to this morning, and I empathise with a lot of what you say. However, the plural of anecdote is not data, and we have to govern for all.
There are also a number of assertions you make which are not backed up - more driven by emotion. It's not that emotion isn't necessary or commendable, just that it doesn't make good policy.
I will come back to it in good time.

typical lab-bot response
 
AC14 You have been asked a lot of very specific, reasonable and salient questions in your absence. There were a lot of them and it would take some time to reply to them all. However, could you at least have a go because you haven't contributed anything specific to the debate so far. You've just called people names and said very vague stuff about it being important to be in power.

People as wrong-minded and outmoded as us are surely sitting targets to be picked apart with reason and evidence. Why don't you have a go?
 
Even #ifCorbynwins...them's his shad-cab ministers...leading a party of neo-lib, austerity believing shysters.
There aren't many like-minded people in the party, and because of the shallow pool of talent he's got to draw from, he'd end up with a cabinet of backstabbing filth. That said, some of the new intake is supposed to be the most left-wing in years. Richard Burgon, Cat Smith and Clive Lewis look interesting. But then I see the numbers of MPs that have nominated the 'modernisers' and I despair.
 
Back
Top Bottom