DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
good chat from corbyn here
I think we're seeing/hearing an important part of the beginnings of that process.
So bad...she'll probably win.Kendall is shocking.
So bad...she'll probably win.
She's unspeakably crap, isn't she? Especially the continuous interrupting.Burnham at least gets some points for repeatedly cunting off the insufferable host person.
I was thinking the other day about how to weaponise ebola and tailor it to a specific persons individual genes SpookyFrank you know about genetics- is it doable
Yeah it's called the NUS.
Burnham says the perception articulated by the questioner is widely felt. People feel claimants are getting too much. But there is a campaign to demonise people on benefits. And the disabled are being penalised. That is cruel. In the end, the best answer to this is more jobs, and more good jobs.
and it was such a cool plan. Guess we'll just have to back to the old schoolLong story short, no it's not. Not to that level of specificity. There'd be no way to do it without massive and unpredictable collateral damage.
Yes, I have looked into it.
e2a: You'd also need a good sample of your target's DNA to even begin tailoring a virus. If you're getting close enough to extract blood with a hypodermic, you might as well just poison the fucker.
Kendall says there is a problem for Labour. She met someone in Wales yesterday who said the party did not believe in work.
after enduring that shower, I just hope you are rightI think we're seeing/hearing an important part of the beginnings of that process.
What a surprise:
Ah the same as Ed who met the guy whose neighbour could work but didn't.
labour were not soft on benefits, so where is that woman in Wales getting her information from, the tabloids?