Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

Yep. Labour has been shitting on its' core vote since around 1987, when Pillock & Co first got the idea to not only move centre-ward, but to cultivate the urban middle classes, too.
Irony being, if the Labour Party genuinely could carry what their "traditional base" is supposed to be they'd win every election as a landslide, regardless of the urban middle classes.
 
Because Mandelson is "out", and Chuka knows that round here some people would rather vote for Beelzebub or an undead Thatcher, than a homosexual, and I'm not just talking about the BME communities.
I appreciate that, but how would Mandelson's endorsement make anyone think Umunna was gay?
 
I appreciate that, but how would Mandelson's endorsement make anyone think Umunna was gay?

Because some people unfortunately believe in that old chestnut "The Gay Mafia". The whole conspiracy theory schtick has been popular for decades with the more "out there" evangelical churches (as DotCommunist can probably confirm), and Chuckles's constituency has more than it's fair share of "out there" evangelical churches.
 
Irony being, if the Labour Party genuinely could carry what their "traditional base" is supposed to be they'd win every election as a landslide, regardless of the urban middle classes.
Yup, but they're not interested in struggle, or in class, only in power. Today, not tomorrow! Foot may have been a reformist coot, but he at least understood the need to build and maintain a core movement. Kinnock lost sight of that the moment he expelled Militant, which put any dissenting activists in the party on notice that Kinnock was going to purge anyone who who didn't fit to his vision of Labour.
 
Meaning Labour won the votes of rather less than 20% of the electorate. They clearly haven't got a majority of working class people voting for them, which as the quote unquote worker's party would be something you'd expect them to aim for.

Nobody in the party's upper echelons seems to have noticed this. It's all just hand wringing about how they've failed to win the votes of the upper middle class, a pretty small demographic compared to the ordinary working (and indeed non-working) people they've completely abandoned.
that rests on the assumption that the working class will vote primarily in their own interest (accurately) and that one party can secure the bulk of the working class vote. surely many will be prepared to vote against their own self interest on e.g. social security if they think that it broadly creates more fairness (screwing foreigners). what all the small 'c' conservatives in the working class?

though obviously i completely agree with your last sentence.
 
Because some people unfortunately believe in that old chestnut "The Gay Mafia". The whole conspiracy theory schtick has been popular for decades with the more "out there" evangelical churches (as DotCommunist can probably confirm), and Chuckles's constituency has more than it's fair share of "out there" evangelical churches.
Is there much public consciousness about Mandelson's sexuality? It'd do fuck all either way. Seems a bit off to be helping to circulate these rumours anyway - I'd never heard of them up til now.
 
There was an interview with David Milliband in NY on the news, he said Ed and Gordon before him had given up on aspiration required for a progressive political project. I don't understand what he said either! :)
 
Yup, but they're not interested in struggle, or in class, only in power. Today, not tomorrow! Foot may have been a reformist coot, but he at least understood the need to build and maintain a core movement. Kinnock lost sight of that the moment he expelled Militant, which put any dissenting activists in the party on notice that Kinnock was going to purge anyone who who didn't fit to his vision of Labour.

Derek Hatton:

"a former politician, broadcaster, property developer, businessman".

There's as much to have a pop at there as Chuka, but anyway, long time ago.
 
Is there much public consciousness about Mandelson's sexuality?

Did you sleep through the noughties? :)
Mandelson's sexuality/speculation about his sexuality was a staple of the right-wing press. All the little bits of bitchiness about his young Brazilian "companion"; the sniggering hints about who he was on Oleg Deripaska's yacht with; the sneering about his young political advisors like Benny Wegg-Prosser.

It'd do fuck all either way. Seems a bit off to be helping to circulate these rumours anyway - I'd never heard of them up til now.

I've heard a fair bit of speculation about Chuckles' sexuality, and I don't get out much!
And why would you have heard them? You leave in Preston, not Streatham!
 
Is there much public consciousness about Mandelson's sexuality? It'd do fuck all either way. Seems a bit off to be helping to circulate these rumours anyway - I'd never heard of them up til now.
He's a crap local MP, more to the point, he's the local MP and has refused to act like one, several times. Furthermore, he ran a smear campaign about the Greens allegedly running a smear campaign against him. He's hardly somebody who deserves defending. I don't give a toss about his sexuality, but if he thinks image counts, (and he continues to behave as he has until now) I'll use every fucking thing I can lay my hands on and then some. :mad:
 
Last edited:
He's my brother's MP.
I live in that constituency too and he's refused to outright to do anything to stop the regeneration threat, or to ensure that the consultation was at least fair. He's slick and plays to the BME Christian vote. Go and preach elsewhere mate.
 
How is rumours he is gay gonna damage him? The worlds first black gay labour PM? People would lap it up. And the idea of using someones (alleged) sexuality against them is disgraceful tbh. It not gonna make people using such tactics look.anything other than homophobic loons.
 
How is rumours he is gay gonna damage him? The worlds first black gay labour PM? People would lap it up. And the idea of using someones (alleged) sexuality against them is disgraceful tbh. It not gonna make people using such tactics look.anything other than homophobic loons.
Froggie I'm not looking for a fight about this,these rumours have been floating around (locally) since forever and he's big on image. Want me to lie and say that he's squeaky clean and a saint instead? He capitalises on the vote of homophobic people FFS!
 
Yeah but Im not looking for a fight, just stating my opinion. using gay rumours about someone is a cunts trick. Whats wrong with being gay, by speading rumours he is your making it into an issue that should be made an issue of, your stigmatising homosexuality. Find something else to get him on. There must be something. His Blairism, his past political record. his love of gentrification and wealth creators. Hes been an MP for ages there must be loads of stuff. Aside from anything consider how it makes you look.

Black labour forerunner subjected to homophobic smear campaign by loony-left constituents
 
How is rumours he is gay gonna damage him? The worlds first black gay labour PM? People would lap it up. And the idea of using someones (alleged) sexuality against them is disgraceful tbh. It not gonna make people using such tactics look.anything other than homophobic loons.

You're missing the point, which is that his standing in his constituency and the size of his vote would suffer from such rumours. It's bad enough that back when he was selected in 2008/09 some churchy CLP members abstained because of rumours about him being gay. Extrapolate that to a consituency with, as I've said, more than its' share of evangelical Christians, and being "blessed" by Mandelson doesn't look like such a gift after all.
 
So what if umuna is gay tbh? I mean who fucking cares, this isnt the 1980s with simon hughes again.

It's not about whether he's gay. it's about how, in a political world where presentation is king, things can look like or be made to look like. He's a single sermon away from some disgruntled pastor stirring the pot, and if that happens it gives ammo to the right-wing press, just like it did with Mandelson himself.
 
Yeah but Im not looking for a fight, just stating my opinion. <snip>
If you love him so much, live here with him as a fucking useless careerist MP.

Then, and only then can you lecture me, missy!
 
You're missing the point, which is that his standing in his constituency and the size of his vote would suffer from such rumours. It's bad enough that back when he was selected in 2008/09 some churchy CLP members abstained because of rumours about him being gay. Extrapolate that to a consituency with, as I've said, more than its' share of evangelical Christians, and being "blessed" by Mandelson doesn't look like such a gift after all.

I've heard he has some black ancestry. Why not plug that one to capitalise on the racist vote?
 
We talk about all sorts of shit. I lived in Streatham for a bit too. Either way, I'm not sure how this justifies spreading homophobic smears about him. There's plenty you can gut the fucker on without heading down that route.

Who's spreading smears? If you read my original post, you'll notice that I'm expressing worry about a possibility.
If that's a "smear" to you, then go polish your knob.
 
Its like when people call thatcher a bitch with a shrivelled up vagina or whatever, totally counter productive, how do young women that dont remember the thatcher years look at shit like that. im bisexual and nearly killed myself over being outed among people due to my sexuality. There is loads of actual things he has done you can get him on, gentrification, wealth creators, love of right wing christian homophobes etc etc, all of which without reference to his sexuality. Do you want to say i bet he hasnt got a correct birth certificate and therefore right to be PM as well (hint hint)? Spreading rumours someone is gay or making an issue of their sexuality to gain political capital is a cunts trick ive got no respect for people who do it.

hes a blairite wanker, and a shit MP so get him on that.
 
Back
Top Bottom