Given the easy access to cheap booze in the Palace of Westminster that's no surprise3 Lords have resigned the whip accusing JC directly of Anti-semitism. Think they'll be staggered resignations from now until the Panorama tomorrow...
Yeah that's fair enough. I'd forgotten about that page. Nevertheless I object to the Board of Deputies (for it would appear to be most likely them) getting the letter pulled in what is effectively censorship. So I went looking for cached pages, screenshotted it and put it up on general principles.
Ok here's a screenshot of the article:
View attachment 176871
View attachment 176870
link to list of names
Which ones are those? Genuinely interested.
I've shared that with a few peeps on Twitter.
The lawyer seems to have been doxxed just hours ago.I am sceptical about the one from "Bristol CLP" as there is no such CLP. I also googled his name and couldn't find any trace of him.
The other Bristol ones I do know. One was a Facebook friend until I unfriended him, the other is a lawyer who is a friend of several friends. Quite a decent bloke by all accounts so I was a bit surprised to see his name there.
I've shared that with a few peeps on Twitter.
They aren't really interested, I'm not sure how they are going to be persuaded
The lawyer seems to have been doxxed just hours ago.
It's not similar, it is arguing with conspiracy theorists. I don't think these are people who hate on jews per se, but who believe in a particular worldview that reduces Jewish place or history in society to simplistic and thus antisemitic levels: "jews run the media" for example. People who look at complex world events and try to understand systems of power and the players involved and come away with a simplistic narrative. Chris is the wronged party therefore he can do no wrong. But it can both be true that Chris has been wronged - in the case of his labour apologetic statement has been misrepresented - and has done wrong - shitty voting record, retweeting awful people.Yeah, I had a conversation with a friend last week about this. He's critically supportive of Labour from a long term socialist position, and is mostly pretty sensible, but just can't see this as anything other than an attack on those politics, and he won't hear a bad word about WIlliamson. It's really similar as arguing with anti-vaxxers or conspiracy theorists, they just have this blind spot that is impossible to breach.
It's not similar, it is arguing with conspiracy theorists.
A Williamson crank walkout would be of massive benefit to the Labour Party. It'd be win/win for them.I don't know how this situation resolves without a split
Of course. To put (IMHO) all this very simply: there is wrong on both sides. There are bad faith actors on both sides. I don't believe Chris is racist in the "i hate the jews and want them to suffer" sense (which isn't the totality of that which qualifies as antisemitism of course), but he does support awful people and their ideas. Perhaps naively, who knows.There is a clear distinction between believing ‘the Jews run the media’ bollocks and recognising that there are those in the media disingenuously using anti-semitism as a stick to beat Corbyn with. Unfortunately it’s the likes of Williamson giving those critics plenty of ammunition.
& the defensiveness/anger of some Labour supporters faced with these attacks Is understandable when for example 40% of Tory members in a recent poll said they’d like Britain to have a smaller Muslim population (which maybe needed following up with the question ‘how?’) & all the other racist bollocks the other party seems to get a pass for. But y’know, get your fucking house in order and have a think about what you say and how it might sound.
This is how witch hunts work. They don't target the pure and unimpeachable. They go after those with a sketchy record, the oddballs, the chancers, etc. It's the reason we want our union secretaries and stewards to keep their noses clean.It's not similar, it is arguing with conspiracy theorists. I don't think these are people who hate on jews per se, but who believe in a particular worldview that reduces Jewish place or history in society to simplistic and thus antisemitic levels: "jews run the media" for example. People who look at complex world events and try to understand systems of power and the players involved and come away with a simplistic narrative. Chris is the wronged party therefore he can do no wrong. But it can both be true that Chris has been wronged - in the case of his labour apologetic statement has been misrepresented - and has done wrong - shitty voting record, retweeting awful people.
It depends on the numbers. They are largely all Corbyn supporters: would they go on to vote Labour in a GE if they were booted out?A Williamson crank walkout would be of massive benefit to the Labour Party. It'd be win/win for them.
Minimal negative impact electorally (crank vote not significant and thinly spread) and as you say would demonstrate labour taking seriously so win win. Let them run witchhunt road shows in community centres.A Williamson crank walkout would be of massive benefit to the Labour Party. It'd be win/win for them.
It's also instructive that during the recent reinstate/unreinstate kerfuffle many of the talking head types were "Williamson's a cunt and deserves it." Then once Watson [spit] got his way the knives came out for them too. For instance Ash Sarkar being called an anti-Semite on Twitter.
Of course it does. That's witch hunts for you - there will always another witch until either you cede control of the party or fight back. When you do draw the line there will be some who don't like that particular witch. But the alternative is watching a bunch of cunts like Watson, Hodge, etc, etc sabotage the party week in week outA good number of my mates left in the party cancelled their membership when Williamson was re-admitted the other week. Keeping him in has a cost too. Who cares what the cranks do once they've left?
The lawyer seems to have been doxxed just hours ago.
Williamson is a wrecker who should be fucked off. Wherever the line is to be drawn, it shouldn't be under him.Of course it does. That's witch hunts for you - there will always another witch until either you cede control of the party or fight back. When you do draw the line there will be some who don't like that particular witch. But the alternative is watching a bunch of cunts like Watson, Hodge, etc, etc sabotage the party week in week out
Absolutely, yet many of those same critics (of the Novara crew) were sympathetic (with a hint of told you so) when they came under attack from the luvvy brigade.Seen Novara and Sarkar really get it on social media (shown I hasten to add, I avoid that horror generally) for not supporting Williamson (despite their earlier fawning for him), with plenty saying they were now on the wrong side. The Canary have predictably been supportive of Williamson still.
Williamson is a wrecker who should be fucked off. Wherever the line is to be drawn, it shouldn't be under him.