19force8
For the avoidance of faith
Like I said - witch hunts 101Williamson is a wrecker who should be fucked off. Wherever the line is to be drawn, it shouldn't be under him.
Like I said - witch hunts 101Williamson is a wrecker who should be fucked off. Wherever the line is to be drawn, it shouldn't be under him.
You care because in or out they still have a vote during a GE.A good number of my mates left in the party cancelled their membership when Williamson was re-admitted the other week. Keeping him in has a cost too. Who cares what the cranks do once they've left?
Wait, Labour Left Voice are bad as well?yep, which was f*cking disgraceful - jewish lefty, bit obsessed, too close to the LLV uber cranks to be trusted in any political sense, but for the Gnasher / 12 Scouts crew to turn his life upside down cos they disagreed with his politics is just bollocks - yet again they're simply arming the cranks to the teeth, whilst achieving nothing in the actual fight against AS - fuck them
Wait, Labour Left Voice are bad as well?
Just who can be trusted in all of this? Piecing it together is a farking nightmare!
yep, which was f*cking disgraceful - jewish lefty, bit obsessed, too close to the LLV uber cranks to be trusted in any political sense, but for the Gnasher / 12 Scouts crew to turn his life upside down cos they disagreed with his politics is just bollocks - yet again they're simply arming the cranks to the teeth, whilst achieving nothing in the actual fight against AS - fuck them
Although apparently (I say this because I've never seen any tweets from this account) he was encouraging people to do the same.
Thanks. Can I ask, is that representative of the group? Or is that person the sole owner of that account?the whole thing's a stinking mess, and it's never easy to know who to trust on either side, but I remember first hand LLV / Sally Easman being dodgy as f*ck ( and by first hand, as in, I remember the early LLV tweets, before she got a bit cleverer, and am not just using the unnamed source below )
Labour’s left voice of Holocaust denialLabour’s left voice of Holocaust denial
the whole thing's a stinking mess, and it's never easy to know who to trust on either side, but I remember first hand LLV / Sally Easman being dodgy as f*ck ( and by first hand, as in, I remember the early LLV tweets, before she got a bit cleverer, and am not just using the unnamed source below )
Labour’s left voice of Holocaust denialLabour’s left voice of Holocaust denial
Ok, thanks. I did actually think it was a group.Labour Left Voice isn't a group, it's one person.
his argument is that the reason Labour are struggling to deal with allegations of antisemitism is because Ian McNichol took all the casework with him (bizarrely) when he left and Jennie Formby has been trying to clear the backlog which hasn't been made easier by not having access to the case files.
Or something.
I guess that's what they want you to think.Ok, thanks. I did actually think it was a group.
Ok, fair enough. I didn't really know either way. As I've said it's tough to learn the truth about all this (or I'm fucking lazy).And the dog ate my homework.
Ok, fair enough. I didn't really know either way. As I've said it's tough to learn the truth about all this (or I'm fucking lazy).
Labour Left Voice isn't a group, it's one person.
Ok, thanks. I did actually think it was a group.
Also does anyone know the truth of this claim:
I don't know the guy (hope to god I've not linked to a racist!), but his argument is that the reason Labour are struggling to deal with allegations of antisemitism is because Ian McNichol took all the casework with him (bizarrely) when he left and Jennie Formby has been trying to clear the backlog which hasn't been made easier by not having access to the case files.
Or something.
That all as maybe but Damo here was last night calling mark steel a ‘ has been ‘ and ‘ defender of apartheid ‘ for making a v anodyne comment re : a fairly reasoned ( tho wring imo ) attempt to debunk the Graun / 100 Jewish signatories letter ( which Easman signed ) - net result , Steel , after 30 Years of activism / solidarity reflecting on whether the games up in LP - tldr : Damos another plonker
That doesn't appear to be the same person I had cited. Have I misunderstood?
That all as maybe but Damo here was last night calling mark steel a ‘ has been ‘ and ‘ defender of apartheid ‘ for making a v anodyne comment re : a fairly reasoned ( tho wring imo ) attempt to debunk the Graun / 100 Jewish signatories letter ( which Easman signed ) - net result , Steel , after 30 Years of activism / solidarity reflecting on whether the games up in LP - tldr : Damos another plonker
And the dog ate my homework.
I asked the guy for a source and he got back to me with a Skwawkbox link. I gather they aren't taken super seriously on here, but it's presented for consideration. I'm not sure whether or not to trust the Skwawkbox, but I've never dived deeply enough to find out.The files thing sounds like cobblers. An individual can’t simply waltz off with an organisation’s files, which are in any case, surely on a computer and not in a carrier bag.
This aside, disciplinaries in any organisation can be a nightmare. Most organisations or regulators take months/years to conclude them especially when it gets lawyery.
That doesn’t excuse the poor job done around the suspensions of some individuals like Williamson, (or the initial lack of action wholesale) but there is also likely to be some people in there trying to do an honest job. Whether they are being deliberately frustrated in it would need evidencing.
It also doesn’t excuse the apparent inability of the leader to win friends in the Jewish community and reassure.
Why wouldn't you, before sharing their content?I'm not sure whether or not to trust the Skwawkbox, but I've never dived deeply enough to find out.
Didn't watch panorama, should I bother?
I am just doing my due diligenceWhy wouldn't you, before sharing their content?