Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Define successfulIf a (successful) movement against racism is what ‘defeated the left’, it doesn’t say much of the Left
Define successfulIf a (successful) movement against racism is what ‘defeated the left’, it doesn’t say much of the Left
transparently irrational and mad.
Are you taking your meds?
No wonder – Jewish Voice for Labour was set up all the way back in 2017 to support the Corbyn leadership against allegations of anti-semitism. Compare with the submission by Jewish Labour Movement (set up in 1903) to the EHRC, that was damning to the core.the very fact he was close to Jewish Voice for Labour underlines he was not anti-Semitic.
What his Jewish critics don't like is that he's an old-fashioned leftist anti-semite.What his Zionist critics didn’t like is that he talked to the wrong kind of Jews: ie anti-Zionists
Define successful
And here's what they have said today, repeating the false impression Starmer gave that Corbyn had denied anti-semitism.No wonder – Jewish Voice for Labour was set up all the way back in 2017 to support the Corbyn leadership against allegations of anti-semitism. Compare with the submission by Jewish Labour Movement (set up in 1903) to the EHRC, that was damning to the core.
Denial of antisemitism is part of the problem. Keir Starmer made that clear and said that he would act and that it would have no place in the Labour Party. He has taken responsibility and the Labour Party has acted.
It’s the combination of labelling some people as zionists and saying that they don’t understand English irony that I have a problem with. It’s a strange thing for an anti racist to come out with.Do you reject his explanation? If so, why?
In the stuff I quoted, he himself says that he is now more careful about when he uses the word 'zionist' because of the way it is now used as code by antisemites. How is that 'blind'????
You've been fundamentally dishonest here. Not good.
Having seen they have Margaret Hodge, the paedos' friend, as their parliamentary chair, their close association with the Israeli labour party and affiliation with all manner of Zionist organizations I suspect they would have had a good go at JC even if there hadn't been any cases of anti-semitism identifiedNo wonder – Jewish Voice for Labour was set up all the way back in 2017 to support the Corbyn leadership against allegations of anti-semitism. Compare with the submission by Jewish Labour Movement (set up in 1903) to the EHRC, that was damning to the core.
What his Jewish critics don't like is that he's an old-fashioned leftist anti-semite.
You can't be this thick. He was very precisely claiming that they did understand English irony. This specific group of people who harranged the Palestinian ambassador with, in his opinion, a thoroughly dishonest interpretation of what he had said.It’s the combination of labelling some people as zionists and saying that they don’t understand English irony that I have a problem with. It’s a strange thing for an anti racist to come out with.
Could you expand points 1) and 2) pls, esp about the boot being put into racists and the development of this analysis of racism and how a-s fits into this.1) put the boot into a lot of racists
2) resulted in a more developed analysis of racism (and how antisemitism fits into this)
3) antisemtism in Britain is more stigmatised than it was previously
Has it ever occurred to you that the overwhelming majority of the left actually quite like the Jews, too? It's the far right that they need to be concerned about, and this whole shitshow increases the danger.Has it ever occurred to the left that ordinary people actually quite like the Jews? And that by painting Jews as ‘white’ - and therefore not subject to real racism (you know, the sort that the BAMEs get) - you just further advertise our virtue to those who aren’t into this ‘white lives don’t matter’ crap?
I have absolutely no idea what you're getting at.And here's what they have said today...stuff...
Not an accidental choice of words either.
Who is claiming this?Has it ever occurred to the left that ordinary people actually quite like the Jews? And that by painting Jews as ‘white’ - and therefore not subject to real racism (you know, the sort that the BAMEs get) - you just further advertise our virtue to those who aren’t into this ‘white lives don’t matter’ crap?
No one has ever come up to me in a pub and told me how much they like the JewsHas it ever occurred to the left that ordinary people actually quite like the Jews? And that by painting Jews as ‘white’ and therefore not subject to real racism (you know, the sort that the BAMEs get), you just further advertise our virtue to those who aren’t into this ‘white lives don’t matter’ crap?
Labour Party surely going to split up over this.
There are 300,000 members who joined for Corbyn and a well organised left in Momentum. There's enough size and credibility to create a new party, larger than Labour, and take Union funding too.
After the last two elections where the right of the party went out their way to lose, appeals to unity are going to ring pretty fucking hollow.
I have him scheduled to visit grytviken in the next few monthsBut, but, but ...
"Sir Keir Starmer said he visited Scotland to help "unite and unify" Labour, insisting it is time for the party to "pull together" and focus on the job in hand."
we can be concerned about both at the same time! Its a skill we have developed, takes practice i suppose.Has it ever occurred to you that the overwhelming majority of the left actually quite like the Jews, too? It's the far right that they need to be concerned about, and this whole shitshow increases the danger.
What?You can't be this thick. He was very precisely claiming that they did understand English irony. This specific group of people who harranged the Palestinian ambassador with, in his opinion, a thoroughly dishonest interpretation of what he had said.
This was dutifully recorded by the, thankfully silent, Zionists who were in the audience on that occasion, and then came up and berated him afterwards for what he had said.
They clearly have two problems. One is that they don’t want to study history, and secondly, having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all their lives, don’t understand English irony either.
Read the next bit I quoted about what he said of it later. They were, in his opinion, being disingenuous in pretending not to understand the irony that had been employed by the speaker in order to have a go at him. He himself is employing irony here in identifying their two problems.What?
Labour Party surely going to split up over this.
There are 300,000 members who joined for Corbyn and a well organised left in Momentum. There's enough size and credibility to create a new party, larger than Labour, and take Union funding too.
After the last two elections where the right of the party went out their way to lose, appeals to unity are going to ring pretty fucking hollow.
"the BAMES"? what the fuck are you talking about?....and therefore not subject to real racism (you know, the sort that the BAMEs get) ....
we can be concerned about both at the same time! Its a skill we have developed, takes practice i suppose.
"the BAMES"? what the fuck are you talking about?
Labour Party surely going to split up over this.
There are 300,000 members who joined for Corbyn and a well organised left in Momentum. There's enough size and credibility to create a new party, larger than Labour, and take Union funding too.
After the last two elections where the right of the party went out their way to lose, appeals to unity are going to ring pretty fucking hollow.
Ah yes, the "but Blair is a war criminal" argument. You know what? He is. Absolutely. Should rot in a cell somewhere. (preferably somewhere unpleasant)
I can see merits in both your and teqniq's arguments.Ah yes, the "but Blair is a war criminal" argument. You know what? He is. Absolutely. Should rot in a cell somewhere. (preferably somewhere unpleasant)
What in the hell does that have to do with Corbyn's leadership and anti-semitism in the Labour Party? "Oh but look at this guy" is the least convincing argument there is. All that does is convince everyone that yes, there is a problem and Jeremy Corbyn was at the centre of it. Which I don't believe - I think he's utterly clueless in how to deal with this sort of thing, not complicit - but it just encourages it.
‘Whiteness’ is the real racism.
BAMEs (a concept that excludes Jews) are victims of this real racism.
As Jews aren’t BAME, it’s not racist to, for example, paint a mural of a bunch of Jews around a monopoly board under a Freemason image.
just as it’s not really racist to claim that Jews were the chef financiers of the slave trade.