Proper Tidy
Arsed
Tell you what though, it's typical of labour left that it didn't leak this report before the last leadership campaign. Maybe starmer would still have won but it would have been a fuck lot closer
I think it's time I filled in that union form to bin off the political affiliation, or possibly the union altogether TBF.
Yeah. I should have joined BECTU (no affiliation) years ago but the voting rights in Unite, as well as inertia, kept me in place. Fuck em.Is it unite?
Yeah. I should have joined BECTU (no affiliation) years ago but the voting rights in Unite, as well as inertia, kept me in place. Fuck em.
One of the great what ifs of LP history.Tell you what though, it's typical of labour left that it didn't leak this report before the last leadership campaign. Maybe starmer would still have won but it would have been a fuck lot closer
Yes the Labour Left are too soft by half.Tell you what though, it's typical of labour left that it didn't leak this report before the last leadership campaign. Maybe starmer would still have won but it would have been a fuck lot closer
The whole time he was being harangued about it every day he and his team had no clue what was being hidden from him by those dastardly staffers. It was impossible obvs for the leader of the party or someone close to him to to ask to see the complaints that he was interviewed about every day. A sad shambles.
However, when questioned by the office of the Leader of the Opposition (LOTO) about
such matters, as the Party’s handling of antisemitism complaints came under
unprecedented media and political scrutiny, senior GLU and GSO staff, including the
General Secretary Iain McNicol, repeatedly:
● Insisted that all complaints were dealt with promptly.
● Justified delays and claimed that outstanding issues would be dealt with soon.
● Provided timetables for the resolution of cases that were never met.
● Falsely claimed to have processed all antisemitism complaints.
● Falsely claimed that most antisemitism complaints the party received were not
about Labour members.
● Provided highly inaccurate statistics of antisemitism complaints.8
The whole time he was being harangued about it every day he and his team had no clue what was being hidden from him by those dastardly staffers. It was impossible obvs for the leader of the party or someone close to him to to ask to see the complaints that he was interviewed about every day. A sad shambles.
Could you be a bit more specific and point me to what you've written on this particular subject (jews doing undercover black ops for the met in return for the police being on their side)? Very interested in that in particular. Tbh i don't believe you without any evidence so would like to see please.
Read the report. They did ask and Iain McNichol produced false reports that cases were being acted on. The whole truth only came to light when Formby was appointed.
One of the great what ifs of LP history.
Reckon bits like this appearing early on would have seriously dented the soft left --> full-on right swing members.
View attachment 206399
Turns out that the left party of capital really was.
I'm reading through this shit now and you were right.I think that last bullet point ('die in a fire') was targeted at max shanley
Tell you what though, it's typical of labour left that it didn't leak this report before the last leadership campaign. Maybe starmer would still have won but it would have been a fuck lot closer
Oh yes Google: the encyclopaedia of the brain dead. And if somebody is maligned on the Internet by a cowardly little shit whose mantra is ‘truth is the enemy’ it must be true mustn’t it? I don’t need to boast, troll, now crawl back down your hole. Just noticed an unintentional irony in your post: Home only wrote this crap after I took issue when I bumped into him in Housmans bookshop and upbraided him for attacking defendants in the GANDALF conspiracy case (Google that). Yet you now use that as part of recycling a slur. Though all this is no doubt wasted on you: for to understand this requires qualities of intelligence perspective and discernment, none of which are to be found on Google. Still, Bimbo liked your post so job done! Now troll off.Be careful bimble you don't want to get on the wrong side of Larry O'Hara. It's amusing what you can come across when googling someone who boasts patronisingly about their authenticity and inside knowledge
Larry O'Hara looses his marbles
I just wish there were still bookshops in which one could get waylaid by aggravated Urbanites
Bimbo
Oh sorry, did I get a fake name wrong of somebody who liked a post recycling homophobic abuse? How very remiss of me, bit like a foul shot at croquet.well aren’t you a charm.
Oh sorry, did I get a fake name wrong of somebody who liked a post recycling homophobic abuse? How very remiss of me, bit like a foul shot at croquet.
Precisely. I’ve been having a read of this. Whilst it’s highly unsurprising to learn that the Blairite’s in the party bureaucracy connived to undermine the leadership (mirroring the PLP’s public undermining of the leadership) there is some absolutely cracking material in the report. Whilst I’m not well versed enough in the minutia of who’s who in the LP bureaucracy some of the key players must be team Starmer?
So why wait to lose to Starmer before leaking it? Mason has, laughably, already describes the anonymous report as British politics’ ‘Watergate’. Whilst it’s not that it does reveal nicely the cesspit that is the Labour Party establishment and presumably would have caused at least some members to think about the point of a drift back to dead end centrism?
Oh sorry, did I get a fake name wrong of somebody who liked a post recycling homophobic abuse? How very remiss of me, bit like a foul shot at croquet.