Something I've learned from Urban is that its never a good idea to unignore Pickmans Model.
Fatalism? WTF you talking about?
This has been going on for centuries - without it changing anything.
There's a journalism gallery somewhere showing cartoons from past centuries ridiculing the monarchy.
You ever heard of a certain definition of idiocy - people doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different outcome?
Chomsky explains the problem quite well, and he aint the first.
Throwing eggs etc., like university rag weeks etc. are just public schoolboy protests - letting off steam.
People then feel confirmed in their belief that they are living in a tolerant and free society.
That's what you meant when you wrote
? Right? Right?
Something I've learned is that you're a hypocrite snowflakeSomething I've learned from Urban is that its never a good idea to unignore Pickmans Model.
Something I've learned from Urban is that its never a good idea to unignore Pickmans Model.
Here you go again. Resolve the egg trajectory issue here or chuck off.Something I've learned from Urban is that its never a good idea to unignore Pickmans Model.
No it isn't. It's a factual observation.That's pretty much textbook fatalism.
I don't think I've ever have Pickman's on ignore, you on the other hand are on the 'blocked until hell freezes over for being a fucking prick' list.Something I've learned from Urban is that its never a good idea to unignore Pickmans Model.
No it isn't. It's a actual observation.
Learn english - or quote the "textbook".
Fatalism is believing that whatever one does, one can't change the outcome.
That's not the same as pointing out that the particular thing someone is doing is not effective.
Good for whom? In what way is it good? Don't be shy. Explain. If it is good, we should be told in what way it is good. Then we can be thankful to all those people in the past with their political cartoons, milk shakes etc.I only claimed that more egging of the royal parasites was a good thing. Which it is.
Good for whom? In what way is it good? Don't be shy. Explain. If it is good, we should be told in what way it is good. Then we can be thankful to all those people in the past with their political cartoons, milk shakes etc.
How can you give credit to these actions without showing in which way they have a good effect?
That clip of him receiving Truss and the release of it to the press was well done.As far as I was concerned, despite preferring monarchy over republic, the jury was out on Charles.
So far, I think he has done not at all badly.
Yeah, he's ace. He managed to sign that thing with a dodgy pen successfully and has performed multiple walks. I know I couldn't have done that and doubt whether any of the so called lefties on here could say the same. I'm looking forward to seeing him travel around the world in unrivalled luxury next, because I reckon he will be really good at it.As far as I was concerned, despite preferring monarchy over republic, the jury was out on Charles.
So far, I think he has done not at all badly.
Oh, I see. You meant good entertainment.I enjoy seeing toffs being made uncomfortable,
He's an inbred imbecile and a cunt to boot, better than no-one except brain dead bootlickers like yourself.As far as I was concerned, despite preferring monarchy over republic, the jury was out on Charles.
So far, I think he has done not at all badly.
At one level of course they have the effect of being the occasion of a general lightening of the National mood.I shall always harbour fond memories of the egging of Sir John Prescott.The hayseed involved eschewing all thoughts of trajectories merely clapped his egg directly onto Prescott's lapel and was visibly thinking " haha you didnt see that coming" when Prescott struck hjm full in the mush.Oh how we laughed that day and how the nation's spirits soared.Good for whom? In what way is it good? Don't be shy. Explain. If it is good, we should be told in what way it is good. Then we can be thankful to all those people in the past with their political cartoons, milk shakes etc.
How can you give credit to these actions without showing in which way they have a good effect?
And I'm supposed to be the prickAs far as I was concerned, despite preferring monarchy over republic, the jury was out on Charles.
So far, I think he has done not at all badly.
And I'm supposed to be the prick
And I'm supposed to be the prick
I think we can enlarge our complement of pricks to accommodate both of you.And I'm supposed to be the prick
Is that auto correct or some newly discovered irregular plural of prick that you've added to your shtick?I think we can enlarge our complement of prices to accommodate both of you.
Bastard phone. Glad someone's paying attention, corrected nowIs that auto correct or some newly discovered irregular plural of prick that you've added to your shtick?
ie nothingAs far as I was concerned, despite preferring monarchy over republic, the jury was out on Charles.
So far, I think he has done not at all badly.
taboo where?Trying to make fun of or insult Charles III is one thing, addressing the matter of the monarchy and its real, off-the-books power is another matter. That matter is taboo.
I think he's done a great job in the five minutes he's been in charge!Yeah, he's ace. He managed to sign that thing with a dodgy pen successfully and has performed multiple walks. I know I couldn't have done that and doubt whether any of the so called lefties on here could say the same. I'm looking forward to seeing him travel around the world in unrivalled luxury next, because I reckon he will be really good at it.
Almost like a protective shell?I think he has some sort of missile defence system operating around his presence. Some sort of Iron Dome for poultry products.