Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

King Charles III's time is up

Fatalism? WTF you talking about?
This has been going on for centuries - without it changing anything.
There's a journalism gallery somewhere showing cartoons from past centuries ridiculing the monarchy.
You ever heard of a certain definition of idiocy - people doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different outcome?
Chomsky explains the problem quite well, and he aint the first.
Throwing eggs etc., like university rag weeks etc. are just public schoolboy protests - letting off steam.
People then feel confirmed in their belief that they are living in a tolerant and free society.

It's quite simple really. Appealing to the notion that centuries have passed without anything meaningfully changing. That's pretty much textbook fatalism.

That's what you meant when you wrote
? Right? Right?

Wrong.
 
That's pretty much textbook fatalism.
No it isn't. It's a factual observation.
Learn english - or quote the "textbook".
Fatalism is believing that whatever one does, one can't change the outcome.
That's not the same as pointing out that the particular thing someone is doing is not effective.
 
No it isn't. It's a actual observation.
Learn english - or quote the "textbook".
Fatalism is believing that whatever one does, one can't change the outcome.
That's not the same as pointing out that the particular thing someone is doing is not effective.

Effective at what though? I don't recall claiming that chucking eggs will bring about a republic. I only claimed that more egging of the royal parasites was a good thing. Which it is.
 
As far as I was concerned, despite preferring monarchy over republic, the jury was out on Charles.

So far, I think he has done not at all badly.
 
I only claimed that more egging of the royal parasites was a good thing. Which it is.
Good for whom? In what way is it good? Don't be shy. Explain. If it is good, we should be told in what way it is good. Then we can be thankful to all those people in the past with their political cartoons, milk shakes etc.
How can you give credit to these actions without showing in which way they have a good effect?
 
Good for whom? In what way is it good? Don't be shy. Explain. If it is good, we should be told in what way it is good. Then we can be thankful to all those people in the past with their political cartoons, milk shakes etc.
How can you give credit to these actions without showing in which way they have a good effect?

How can I give credit? Easily, I did that just now. I enjoy seeing toffs being made uncomfortable, and I'm not the only one. I don't see why I have to justify my statement any further than that.
 
As far as I was concerned, despite preferring monarchy over republic, the jury was out on Charles.

So far, I think he has done not at all badly.
That clip of him receiving Truss and the release of it to the press was well done.
His more openly authoritative style fits in with the attitudes expressed in the media.
 
As far as I was concerned, despite preferring monarchy over republic, the jury was out on Charles.

So far, I think he has done not at all badly.
Yeah, he's ace. He managed to sign that thing with a dodgy pen successfully and has performed multiple walks. I know I couldn't have done that and doubt whether any of the so called lefties on here could say the same. I'm looking forward to seeing him travel around the world in unrivalled luxury next, because I reckon he will be really good at it.
 
Good for whom? In what way is it good? Don't be shy. Explain. If it is good, we should be told in what way it is good. Then we can be thankful to all those people in the past with their political cartoons, milk shakes etc.
How can you give credit to these actions without showing in which way they have a good effect?
At one level of course they have the effect of being the occasion of a general lightening of the National mood.I shall always harbour fond memories of the egging of Sir John Prescott.The hayseed involved eschewing all thoughts of trajectories merely clapped his egg directly onto Prescott's lapel and was visibly thinking " haha you didnt see that coming" when Prescott struck hjm full in the mush.Oh how we laughed that day and how the nation's spirits soared.
 
Maybe just throw a box of tampons at him next time. I'm sure he wouldn't mind that.

Just sayin'..............;)






The full transcript of Charles and Camilla's six-minute sex-o-thon can be found online, but we've picked out the err, best bits, below.

Charles: Oh stop! I want to feel my way along you, all over you and up and down you and in and out . . .

Camilla: Oh!

Charles: Particularly in and out.

Camilla: Oh, that's just what I need at the moment.

Charles: Is it?

...

Charles: What about me? The trouble is I need you several times a week.

Camilla: Mmmm, so do I. I need you all the week. All the time.

Charles: Oh, God. I’ll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be much easier!

Camilla: (Laughing) What are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers? (Both laugh). Oh, you’re going to come back as a pair of knickers.

Charles: Or, God forbid, a Tampax. Just my luck! (Laughs)

Camilla: You are a complete idiot! (Laughs) Oh, what a wonderful idea.

Charles: My luck to be chucked down the lavatory and go on and on forever swirling round on the top, never going down.

Camilla: (Laughing) Oh, Darling!

Charles: Until the next one comes through.

Camilla: Oh, perhaps you could come back as a box.

Charles: What sort of box?

Camilla: A box of Tampax, so you could just keep going.

Charles: That's true.

Camilla: Repeating yourself...(Laughing) Oh, darling I just want you now.

Charles: Do you?

Camilla: Mmmmm

Charles: So do I!

Camilla: Desperately, desperately.
 
Trying to make fun of or insult Charles III is one thing, addressing the matter of the monarchy and its real, off-the-books power is another matter. That matter is taboo.
 
Yeah, he's ace. He managed to sign that thing with a dodgy pen successfully and has performed multiple walks. I know I couldn't have done that and doubt whether any of the so called lefties on here could say the same. I'm looking forward to seeing him travel around the world in unrivalled luxury next, because I reckon he will be really good at it.
I think he's done a great job in the five minutes he's been in charge!
 
Does Charles have a severe egg allergy?

Assassins keep trying to off him using egg based projectiles.

This tactic is proving highly ineffective in my opinion. He hasn't died once yet.
 
Last edited:
I think he has some sort of missile defence system operating around his presence. Some sort of Iron Dome for poultry products.
 
Back
Top Bottom