Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

There's still no minister for disabled people.

This is an extract of a letter Disability Rights UK wrote to Starmer last Friday:



Labour Fail to Appoint Minister for Disabled People One Week After Election | Disability Rights UK
The new minister is Stephen Timms.

Starmer and co didn't bother telling disability charities the news, as per my post above. I've been looking online every day since the election results, but although the appointment was made on the 8th of July, have only just managed to find out. (I posted, wrongly, in the election thread that former Shadow Minister Vicky Foxcroft had been picked, but the information I'd read was incorrect.)

The title of the role has been changed again, this time from "Minister of State for Disabled People, Health and Work" to "Minister of State for Social Security and Disability."

Minister of State (Minister for Social Security and Disability) - GOV.UK

A former chair of the Work and Pensions Select Committee, Timms has supported benefit "sanctions" and forcing people off disability benefits, so not a great surprise he's been picked unfortunately.

"What the current [Conservative] government is doing is going through a process we established," he said.

He is also known to be a homophobic bigot who supported the war on Iraq.

It's great that the Tories are out. 🤨
 
The Mail seems to be gravely concerned about Starmer’s plans for government. To the extent whereby they have used their trademark double plus signs of Doom reserved for the most serious of events only

IMG_6094.jpeg

On an unrelated matter, is there an actual typographical definition for such character usage? I only ever recall the Heil using them in such fashion.
 
The Mail seems to be gravely concerned about Starmer’s plans for government. To the extent whereby they have used their trademark double plus signs of Doom reserved for the most serious of events only

View attachment 433796

On an unrelated matter, is there an actual typographical definition for such character usage? I only ever recall the Heil using them in such fashion.
England flags?
 
The Mail seems to be gravely concerned about Starmer’s plans for government. To the extent whereby they have used their trademark double plus signs of Doom reserved for the most serious of events only

View attachment 433796

On an unrelated matter, is there an actual typographical definition for such character usage? I only ever recall the Heil using them in such fashion.
Pretty standard isn’t it? The right scream it’s a socialist revolution, the left shout it’s just Tories in new clothing…
 
On an unrelated matter, is there an actual typographical definition for such character usage? I only ever recall the Heil using them in such fashion.

it's almost but not quite

charlie chaplin in 'the great dictator'
 
The Mail seems to be gravely concerned about Starmer’s plans for government. To the extent whereby they have used their trademark double plus signs of Doom reserved for the most serious of events only

View attachment 433796

On an unrelated matter, is there an actual typographical definition for such character usage? I only ever recall the Heil using them in such fashion.
"Extra power for the unions"
"Rights to work from home"
"Anti-strike law scrapped "
"More diversity monitoring "

They say these like they're bad things...
 
"Extra power for the unions"
"Rights to work from home"
"Anti-strike law scrapped "
"More diversity monitoring "
I'm not sure how much any of those things are being proposed. The report I read this morning didn't mention any of those and explicitly said the right to WFH wasn't included in the new workers' rights bill.
 
I'm not sure how much any of those things are being proposed. The report I read this morning didn't mention any of those and explicitly said the right to WFH wasn't included in the new workers' rights bill.

There was some talk about diversity monitoring, not sure as haven’t read the detail but had the impression it might be an ethnicity / disability version of Gender Pay Gap reporting
 
Once again I can't tell whether he's serious (from bluesky) but from his posting history I think he is:

Isn't it nice to have some national pride again, rather than cringing every time our so-called leaders opened their mouths and stuck in their collective feet over some exceptionalist claim or other misstep?
Post by johndpoconnellParis2024: A reminder from last night that UK's Prime Minister, instead of donning a rather naff poncho, brought his own weather protection. He was able to read the weather report. He was prepared. He made a sensible decision based on available information. Unlike our last Prime Minister.
that really is a low bar: whether he's got a coat. Churchillian :thumbs:
 
Euan Philipps's gang is doing two things here: first, they conflate Jews with Israel and second, they seem to believe genocide and ethnic cleansing is fine and should continue.
Labour Against Antisemitism (LAAS) – a group of predominantly Jewish party members who campaign against anti-Semitism – has written to Sir Keir raising concerns about Labour’s stance on the Middle East.
The letter said: “Disappointingly, during the recent campaign election candidates from several parties – including yours – sought to exploit existing racial and religious divisions and ran campaigns centred on the conflict between Israel and Hamas, a foreign conflict thousands of miles away.

Original article here.
 
Back
Top Bottom