Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Bet that was part of whatever deal is about to be announced…

Which deal? It just says that Britain is objecting using a 'flimsy' legal argument.
According to the British government, the 1993 Oslo Accords that created the Palestinian National Authority prevents Palestine from prosecuting Israelis for war crimes.

The argument has been critiqued as flimsy by legal scholars. Palestine was accepted into the ICC in 2015, and in 2021 the court said it had the power to investigate war crimes in the occupied territories.

Earlier this month, the Guardian reported that Labour government would drop its attempt to delay the ICC's decision.

The report by Maariv came after reports last week that the US was lobbying the Labour government to not to drop the legal challenge.

If the Maariv report is confirmed, it would suggest those lobbying efforts have been successful.
 
There's still no minister for disabled people.

This is an extract of a letter Disability Rights UK wrote to Starmer last Friday:

We are writing to you on behalf of Disabled people’s organisations and the UK’s 16 million Disabled citizens, to ask why on day 7 of your new Government, a Disability Minister hasn’t yet been appointed.

Disabled people experience considerable inequality and injustice, many of us live in poverty due to inadequate benefits and incomes, have low educational attainment, face barriers to entering and staying in work. Lack social care and SEND support, struggle to access the NHS and experience barriers in respect of housing, transport, information and the built environment.

It is absolutely essential that the Labour Government tackles these inequalities and develops a transformational plan for change.

Labour Fail to Appoint Minister for Disabled People One Week After Election | Disability Rights UK
 
Gaza: the problem for Labour that won't go away.
The Labour Party’s landslide general election victory on 4 July has been compared to the party’s previous wins under Tony Blair in 1997 and Clement Atlee in 1945. But Keir Starmer won a far smaller vote share than either Blair or Attlee and, unlike in 1997 and 1945, the mood of the victors was hardly euphoric – more damp squib than firework display.

The party’s win was not down to any widespread love of Starmer’s policies, but a deeply embedded antagonism to the 14 years of the Tory rule, aided by Nigel Farage’s Reform Party taking votes from the Conservatives, the collapse of the SNP vote in Scotland and an unusually low national turnout.

Labour was further held back by an unexpectedly large number of voters who abandoned the party – many of whom were motivated by its stance on Israel’s assault on Gaza. The mainstream media has wrongly attributed this to the UK’s substantial Muslim minority, portraying it as just a sectarian issue – ignoring the anger and hurt felt by many on the left.

Independent candidates stood primarily on a pro-Gaza ticket across many parts of the north of England, the Midlands and London. Five were elected – a record for a general election – and many more came close, most notably Leanne Mohamad in Ilford North, who managed to reduce new health secretary Wes Streeting’s majority from 5,218 to just 528.
 
Israel lobbyists funded half of Starmer's cabinet, and while that remains the case, the new government's position will remain little different to that of the outgoing government.

From Declassified.
Pro-Israel lobbyists have donated to 13 out of Labour’s 25 cabinet members since they were first elected to parliament, Declassified can reveal.

The list of recipients includes prime minister Keir Starmer, his deputy Angela Rayner, chancellor Rachel Reeves, foreign secretary David Lammy and home secretary Yvette Cooper.

Jonathan Reynolds, who will oversee arms exports to Israel as UK trade secretary, is another beneficiary, alongside Labour’s election mastermind Pat McFadden, whose responsibilities now include national security.

Some of the donations were provided by Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), a lobby group which takes MPs on “fact-finding” missions to the region.

Reeves, McFadden, Reynolds and technology secretary Peter Kyle were recently listed as vice-chairs of LFI.

Other major funders include pro-Israel businessmen Trevor Chinn and Stuart Roden.

The total value of the donations amounts to over £300,000.
 
Last edited:

Difficult to read this. It's easier when you realise there isn't anywhere that shows the 2019 vote stacked up.

The Lib Dem vote is interesting. They both gained a lot of voters and lost a lot of voters. It does show they have little in the way of a firm base and their fortunes are dependent on tactical voting.

It shows quite clearly how first time (potential) voters, the 18-22 cohort, are largely not voting, only 7 out of 36 voting Labour.

Also that did not vote party are killing it. Growing and it looks like they're getting younger. There's a big story about how the Tories are not replenishing their dying voter base, but that looks true across the board.
 
Yep. Combining Whagwan and Knotted points, it is clear that Labour were truly uninspirational.

There is disaffection across the board, and the main reason for the Labour 'landslide' was the Refuck effect on the tory vote. Redistribute the Refuck voters back where they came from in 2019 and it's a very close election.

It's not hugely helpful that they have combined SNP with Plaid as Plaid did ok, but the graph also shows how skewed the election system is. A relatively small fall in your share of the vote can lead to massive losses in seats.
 
Yep. Combining Whagwan and Knotted points, it is clear that Labour were truly uninspirational.

There is disaffection across the board, and the main reason for the Labour 'landslide' was the Refuck effect on the tory vote. Redistribute the Refuck voters back where they came from in 2019 and it's a very close election.

It's not hugely helpful that they have combined SNP with Plaid as Plaid did ok, but the graph also shows how skewed the election system is. A relatively small fall in your share of the vote can lead to massive losses in seats.
yet for some years to come we'll hear more about shammer has a massive mandate. i wonder how he'll take a massive defeat in 2029 or so. if they're already looking at how they'll run the next election campaign you can be sure the ideas will all have lost their shine by the time the campaign starts
 
Also that did not vote party are killing it. Growing and it looks like they're getting younger. There's a big story about how the Tories are not replenishing their dying voter base, but that looks true across the board.
One of the consequences (for Labour anyway) of their 'nowhere else to go' strategy. Where for some voters 'nowhere' now actually means 'not voting'. Who could've foreseen that, eh?
 
If "mandate" means "can do whatever without the opposition being able to stop them" as it seems to have under the Tories then absolutely Starmer has one. I mean he leads the Labour Party and they had a big win in the election. I think most respondents would have noticed that.
Yeh. But that support isn't actually built on anything solid. So when shammer finds things start to crumble he'll find like sunak that a plurality of mps isn't all you expect it to be
 
Back
Top Bottom