Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

"A “secondary palette” has been composed to match messaging relating to Labour’s “missions”. They are “growth pink”, “green energy green”, “NHS blue”, “policing yellow” and “opportunity purple”."


As election for Mayor and London Assembly are coming on 2nd May I got a few leaflets this week from Labour. No Union Jacks on either of them. So maybe this will not happen.

Or as article suggests some in Labour want a "segmented" approach to how leaflets look.

Unnamed MPs said:

why can’t we have segmented branding,” they added, using a phrase Labour strategists coined for the slice of the electorate who swing directly from Tory to Labour and who tend to be more socially conservative and pro-Brexit.

“I can see how it would work in some places but it’s definitely detrimental in university towns, and in heavily BAME seats

I'm in inner London seat that is heavily BAME.

Leaflets I got are Red. And Sadiq is standing on programme that could be seen as left

Council Housing, free school meals, climate change, standard of living for Londoners, more neighbourhood policing is on leaflet as what he will deliver- "A better fairer greener London"

Nothing about "business" as such. But bread and butter issues for Londoners.
 
All this my family are working class I love the smell of horseshit at football comes over as so painfully manufactured that it’s no wonder it’s just seen as a joke . It doesn’t even come over as a lesson in aspiration or adversity either .
Whilst I’d genuinely like a working class left wing leader who has got his hands dirty most people I know would like someone who has some policies that practically and demonstratively benefit the w/class (and the majority of people) , someone who is able to communicate naturally and effectively , and with either competence or character/like-ability. Starmer just hasn’t got it has he ?
Starmer's affectation about how 'some of my family are working class' comes across as less about him having any real understanding, affinity and solidarity with working class people and more like racists who say 'one of my best friends is Black'.
 
As election for Mayor and London Assembly are coming on 2nd May I got a few leaflets this week from Labour. No Union Jacks on either of them. So maybe this will not happen.

Or as article suggests some in Labour want a "segmented" approach to how leaflets look.

Unnamed MPs said:



I'm in inner London seat that is heavily BAME.

Leaflets I got are Red. And Sadiq is standing on programme that could be seen as left

Council Housing, free school meals, climate change, standard of living for Londoners, more neighbourhood policing is on leaflet as what he will deliver- "A better fairer greener London"

Nothing about "business" as such. But bread and butter issues for Londoners.
Sounds like we got the same leaflet in Tottenham.

Makes sense for the upcoming London Mayoral and Assembly elections.

Sticking Starmer's face on anything would be an overall vote loser.
 
I was looking at some of the videos and assorted internet shit people were making just a few years ago about Labour e.g.
.
It reminded me that there was that brief period when there was actually a feeling that there could be some pushback, however minor, against a transparently unjust system via mainstream politics - and also that that gave us an opportunity to go further.

That shit really didn't last long did it.
 
Interesting from the Forde Report:

1711831584438.png
Has anyone else read the Forde Report? Half way through and I have to say that it is very strangely worded - all the way through it talks about factionalism under Corbyn, implying and sometimes just stating that it was Corbyn's fault.

It didn't seem to recognize that one 'faction' was led by the Leader of the Opposition and Labour leader properly voted in and aimed to get broadly democratic socialist policies implemented, and the other 'faction' was the right of the party deliberately working against this and often in bad faith.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like we got the same leaflet in Tottenham.

Makes sense for the upcoming London Mayoral and Assembly elections.

Sticking Starmer's face on anything would be an overall vote loser.

I agree.

What I found interesting about the leaflet was that I also got one from my local MP Helen Hayes at same time. So effectively endorsing his campaign.

What his campaign is saying is not part of what Starmer has been saying recently.

It is outlining promises that left of Labour party voters could get behind.

Sadiq is fairly quiet and uncontroversial to the point of being invisible as a Mayor.

So can get way with this line on his leaflets. He is not directly criticising Starmer leadership publicly.

Problem is what if Labour gets into power and tells Sadiq no money for Council housing?

Read this by James Medway today and agree with this:


A lot of local politicians ( including my Labour Council ) blame everything on Tories and say vote Labour. But Starmer and Reeves keep saying no magic money tree etc when they get into power.
 
This has very possibly occurred to me before, and I'm sure already has to many others, but it just clicked that Starmer's PM-ship could start with 4 years of a Trump presidency.

That will, of course, but absolutely horrendous, but it'll be interesting to see just what course he navigates between 'maintaining the special relationship' and, y'know, a madman and his cronies in charge of the US :hmm:
 
Twenty Lancashire councillors have resigned their Labour memberships in protest over the party's leadership.

The councillors each sit on Pendle Borough Council, Nelson Town Council or Brierfield Town Council.

They claim that the leadership of Sir Keir Starmer KCB KC MP no longer reflects their views and say that they will now serve as independents:

Pendle Borough Council leader and 20 councillors resign from Labour party over 'bullying' claims


%2Fmethode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F10398140-6482-11ee-92b7-341e89720b32.jpg


(Source: Sunday Times)

Councillor Asjad Mahmood said: "As a Labour councillor, I have always felt that the party’s policies were aligned with my own beliefs and those of the constituents who have honoured me with their votes. Sadly, over a recent period, senior party officials have attempted to impose their ideas at a local level. I was elected to serve the public, not party officials."
 
It may not be entirely a surprise to learn they're bing a bit misleading there - last month they were bragging about a record year in 2023 thanks to a handful of big private donors. So it might be accurate to say they no longer have as many regular donations, but they're making up for it by selling themselves to millionaires.

 
then theres all the staffers on loan from various cunt outfits. Anything other than member money is good, unions caved so those p's are in regardless...
 
Interesting from the Forde Report:

View attachment 417932
Has anyone else read the Forde Report? Half way through and I have to say that it is very strangely worded - all the way through it talks about factionalism under Corbyn, implying and sometimes just stating that it was Corbyn's fault.

It didn't seem to recognize that one 'faction' was led by the Leader of the Opposition and Labour leader properly voted in and aimed to get broadly democratic socialist policies implemented, and the other 'faction' was the right of the party deliberately working against this and often in bad faith.

FWIW the thing about the 2017 General Election is that there wasn't the factional conflict that we saw before or afterwards - they had the bright idea of letting him / "the left" run that campaign solo in order for Corbs to have to own the monstrous kicking that May would hand out. They all shut up, went away, looked after their own affairs etc instead and waited for the crash.

This had the dual effect of making Labour look much less divided than it was, but more importantly it considerably improved the quality of the campaign because it was no longer reliant on people who had limited ability in national politics and less ability at winning things on a national level. In 2019 they recognized their mistake, which was when the factionalism really did kick in for several people now ennobled.
 
I think he is chasing the Tory votes that are being lost to reform

Labours position in polls is fairly flat at present but Tory vote still dropping, with reform increasing?
 
Britain is spending £54.2bn on defence this year.
GDP in 2023 was £2,690bn, so 2.5% is £67.25bn
So he's suggesting an annual boost of £13bn per annum.
The green investment pledge he ditched because it would be "too expensive" was going to be worth £28bn per annum.

Conclusion: He's specifically redirected a full half of the budget designed to make UK industry and utilities ready for the inevitable need to ditch fossil fuel dependency towards a fictional scenario in which Britain faces invasion (in reality a scenario where Britain's ruling class will be trying to keep up with the Joneses in a pointless willy-waving compeition).

In the household parlance politicians are so fond of, he's spending the roof fund on Christmas lights. "The adults are back in the room."
 
Last edited:
Britain is spending £54.2bn on defence this year.
GDP in 2023 was £2,690bn, so 2.5% is £67.25bn
So he's suggesting an annual boost of £13bn per annum.
The green investment pledge he ditched because it would be "too expensive" was going to be worth £28bn per annum.

Conclusion: He's specifically redirected a full half of the budget designed to make UK industry and utilities ready for the inevitable need to ditch fossil fuel dependency towards a fictional scenario in which Britain faces invasion (in reality a scenario where Britain's ruling class will be trying to keep up with the Joneses in a pointless willy-waving compeition).
Presumably they think defence is an upcoming Tory attack line and they think not scaring Tory-turned-potential-Labour voters is more important than all that Green nonsense. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom