Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
They are believers. They are not sub payers.I’m not sure that that even the one true path Labour lot on here are tbh ?
They are believers. They are not sub payers.I’m not sure that that even the one true path Labour lot on here are tbh ?
"A “secondary palette” has been composed to match messaging relating to Labour’s “missions”. They are “growth pink”, “green energy green”, “NHS blue”, “policing yellow” and “opportunity purple”."
Keir Starmer faces discontent as Labour MPs reject union jack election flyers
Exclusive: Members say flag may alienate ethnic minority voters as some associate it with far rightwww.theguardian.com
why can’t we have segmented branding,” they added, using a phrase Labour strategists coined for the slice of the electorate who swing directly from Tory to Labour and who tend to be more socially conservative and pro-Brexit.
“I can see how it would work in some places but it’s definitely detrimental in university towns, and in heavily BAME seats
Starmer's affectation about how 'some of my family are working class' comes across as less about him having any real understanding, affinity and solidarity with working class people and more like racists who say 'one of my best friends is Black'.All this my family are working class I love the smell of horseshit at football comes over as so painfully manufactured that it’s no wonder it’s just seen as a joke . It doesn’t even come over as a lesson in aspiration or adversity either .
Whilst I’d genuinely like a working class left wing leader who has got his hands dirty most people I know would like someone who has some policies that practically and demonstratively benefit the w/class (and the majority of people) , someone who is able to communicate naturally and effectively , and with either competence or character/like-ability. Starmer just hasn’t got it has he ?
Sounds like we got the same leaflet in Tottenham.As election for Mayor and London Assembly are coming on 2nd May I got a few leaflets this week from Labour. No Union Jacks on either of them. So maybe this will not happen.
Or as article suggests some in Labour want a "segmented" approach to how leaflets look.
Unnamed MPs said:
I'm in inner London seat that is heavily BAME.
Leaflets I got are Red. And Sadiq is standing on programme that could be seen as left
Council Housing, free school meals, climate change, standard of living for Londoners, more neighbourhood policing is on leaflet as what he will deliver- "A better fairer greener London"
Nothing about "business" as such. But bread and butter issues for Londoners.
Sticking Starmer's face on anything would be an overall vote loser.
Sounds like we got the same leaflet in Tottenham.
Makes sense for the upcoming London Mayoral and Assembly elections.
Sticking Starmer's face on anything would be an overall vote loser.
its a slightly misleading downplaying headline as the key numbers are 532,000 to 366,602 with a constant downward trajectory since 2019...so 166,000 less members - that's about the amount of members the Tory party has in totalLabour membership falls by 23,000 over Gaza and green policies
Party claims financial position still strong as it continues to hold a commanding lead in opinion pollswww.theguardian.com
Oh dear.
Interesting from the Forde Report:
View attachment 417932
Has anyone else read the Forde Report? Half way through and I have to say that it is very strangely worded - all the way through it talks about factionalism under Corbyn, implying and sometimes just stating that it was Corbyn's fault.
It didn't seem to recognize that one 'faction' was led by the Leader of the Opposition and Labour leader properly voted in and aimed to get broadly democratic socialist policies implemented, and the other 'faction' was the right of the party deliberately working against this and often in bad faith.
I suspect that this is a fake.Someone on reddit saying they got begging email from Labour
View attachment 418912
how could this happen with such a charismatic leader and such popular policies?
Labour aims to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP
Starmer’s comments come before visit to Barrow, where he is to promise nuclear deterrent is ‘bedrock’ of security planwww.theguardian.com
I’d rather we spend on the NHS, housing and education not nuclear missiles and war.
Is this what he believes in or is it a way of winning votes?Labour aims to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP
Starmer’s comments come before visit to Barrow, where he is to promise nuclear deterrent is ‘bedrock’ of security planwww.theguardian.com
I’d rather we spend on the NHS, housing and education not nuclear missiles and war.
Presumably it's something he/they believe will win votes.Is this what he believes in or is it a way of winning votes?
I cannot vote for a party that does this.
Is this what he believes in or is it a way of winning votes?
I cannot vote for a party that does this.
Clearly you are a middle class leftieLabour aims to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP
Starmer’s comments come before visit to Barrow, where he is to promise nuclear deterrent is ‘bedrock’ of security planwww.theguardian.com
I’d rather we spend on the NHS, housing and education not nuclear missiles and war.
Presumably they think defence is an upcoming Tory attack line and they think not scaring Tory-turned-potential-Labour voters is more important than all that Green nonsense.Britain is spending £54.2bn on defence this year.
GDP in 2023 was £2,690bn, so 2.5% is £67.25bn
So he's suggesting an annual boost of £13bn per annum.
The green investment pledge he ditched because it would be "too expensive" was going to be worth £28bn per annum.
Conclusion: He's specifically redirected a full half of the budget designed to make UK industry and utilities ready for the inevitable need to ditch fossil fuel dependency towards a fictional scenario in which Britain faces invasion (in reality a scenario where Britain's ruling class will be trying to keep up with the Joneses in a pointless willy-waving compeition).