Calamity1971
If Mr Peanut says It's okay, then it is.
Just another normal day out with mogg.
There are other lists, though.How MPs voted and who rebelled in crunch Gaza ceasefire amendment
MPs have voted on an SNP amendment to the King's Speech calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. The motion failed, but here are the MPs who voted for it.www.heraldscotland.com
No suprise to see my MP is sadly not on the list
What did Jess Phillips ever do to make herself stand out from all the other MPs here? Some of the reporting about this vote only mentions her! Id be a bit annoyed if i was one of the other 56 mps. One line said 'the most high profile MP to resign is Jess Phillips'...I vaguely know her from being against Corbyn but has she done anything else that makes her some kind of big name?
She's written several books that went down brilliantly with the type of self regarding 'centrist' who believes themselves to be quite radical but thought everything in the UK was great until after the Brexit vote. There aren't many of these people, but nearly all of them live in London and work in the media.What did Jess Phillips ever do to make herself stand out from all the other MPs here? Some of the reporting about this vote only mentions her! Id be a bit annoyed if i was one of the other 56 mps. One line said 'the most high profile MP to resign is Jess Phillips'...I vaguely know her from being against Corbyn but has she done anything else that makes her some kind of big name?
Also he is looking for excuses to prevent "insufficiently loyal" MPs being candidates at the general election, breaking the whip is something he can use against some of them over the next few months. Assume he is purely in politics for the money and has absolutely no sense of responsibility then it kind of makes sense, with that as the base assumption actually winning the general election isn't particularly important to him, the difference in salary between PM and leader of the opposition is trivial compared to what he is raking in from wealthy donors. I'm not claiming it is necessarily how he is thinking, but if it is everything he is doing makes sense. Alternatively he may just be a privileged self important idiot. Either way he needs to be booted out of Parliament.I don't really understand why Starmer didn't make it a vote of conscience, surely that would have avoided any problems.
Apart from him being an utter control freak of course.
Also he is looking for excuses to prevent "insufficiently loyal" MPs being candidates at the general election, breaking the whip is something he can use against some of them over the next few months. Assume he is purely in politics for the money and has absolutely no sense of responsibility then it kind of makes sense, with that as the base assumption actually winning the general election isn't particularly important to him, the difference in salary between PM and leader of the opposition is trivial compared to what he is raking in from wealthy donors. I'm not claiming it is necessarily how he is thinking, but if it is everything he is doing makes sense. Alternatively he may just be a privileged self important idiot. Either way he needs to be booted out of Parliament.
That's quite an assumption.Also he is looking for excuses to prevent "insufficiently loyal" MPs being candidates at the general election, breaking the whip is something he can use against some of them over the next few months. Assume he is purely in politics for the money
And that.and has absolutely no sense of responsibility then it kind of makes sense, with that as the base assumption actually winning the general election isn't particularly important to him,
He's a KC and could presumably make a fair amount of money doing that. And what's the money he's raking in from wealthy donors? Is that going in his pocket (is that even legal?) or is it going to running his office, for specific campaigns etc?the difference in salary between PM and leader of the opposition is trivial compared to what he is raking in from wealthy donors. I'm not claiming it is necessarily how he is thinking, but if it is everything he is doing makes sense. Alternatively he may just be a privileged self important idiot. Either way he needs to be booted out of Parliament.
The surprise being that there's 56 actual LP MPs left after his purginghe's an effective politician tbf...his politics stink but the lesson is corbyn should've done similiar i.e. fuck the labour party as a coalition, cement it as a democratic socialist party
Because he is "committed to rooting out anti semitism." He has to support Israel, no matter what, or get the same stuff that Corbyn did.I don't really understand why Starmer didn't make it a vote of conscience, surely that would have avoided any problems.
Apart from him being an utter control freak of course.
Let's put it this way. His estimated "net worth" has increased from £3 million in 2015 to just under £8 million now. So his overall gain in net worth during his time in politics is larger than than over his entire career in law.I don't think it makes any sense to think he's in it for the money tbh. How much would he have been raking in as a KC? For me it's similar to Sunak and plenty of others, it's fundamentally an ego trip not some sort of financial scam.
Where are you getting these numbers from?Let's put it this way. His estimated "net worth" has increased from £3 million in 2015 to just under £8 million now. So his overall gain in net worth during his time in politics is larger than than over his entire career in law.
TBF, we may hate her for being deep as a puddle, but that is the skillset that Labour is desperately lacking in right now. Someone has to manipulate the media that are generally hostile to even Starmer's Labour Party. Think of her like a shit Mandelson. Horrible, but they have a job and they're good at it. I don't know why the media play nicey-nicey with her, but it's a useful skill/feature.She’s a massive self serving shit who plays the media well or at least gets them to notice her
Even by politician standards
I think he was trying to show that Labour are a united party or will be as opposed to a party in chaos like that other lot. And blew it.I don't really understand why Starmer didn't make it a vote of conscience, surely that would have avoided any problems.
Apart from him being an utter control freak of course.
Let's put it this way. His estimated "net worth" has increased from £3 million in 2015 to just under £8 million now. So his overall gain in net worth during his time in politics is larger than than over his entire career in law.
I don't like Jess Phillips or what she stands for, but I think she's pretty smart at politics. And I'm sure she will have calculated that this little rebellion will not only cement her hold on her seat, it will also add a veneer of faux-radicalism and appearance of being principled, which will do her no harm at all in a future leadership election, labour party members being pretty gullible.TBF, we may hate her for being deep as a puddle, but that is the skillset that Labour is desperately lacking in right now. Someone has to manipulate the media that are generally hostile to even Starmer's Labour Party. Think of her like a shit Mandelson. Horrible, but they have a job and they're good at it. I don't know why the media play nicey-nicey with her, but it's a useful skill/feature.
Nutshell. She is a skilful opportunistI don't like Jess Phillips or what she stands for, but I think she's pretty smart at politics. And I'm sure she will have calculated that this little rebellion will not only cement her hold on her seat, it will also add a veneer of faux-radicalism and appearance of being principled, which will do her no harm at all in a future leadership election, labour party members being pretty gullible.
10 acres of land in Surrey and a house in Kentish Town are part of it. However the increase in value of those is just 30% over that period.Well I'm sceptical of these numbers but even taking them at face value I think this misses the point of how rich people get richer. What is his net worth? It's not going to what he has in the bank on the whole, it'll be his no doubt massive house plus whatever else he's invested all that money in which compounds over time. With all that plus a massive salary how much would he have made as a QC/KC in that time? Five million doesn't seem unlikely.
ETA: I think what it means to have a Labour leader with those interests is an important question btw.
He didn't own the Surrey land before he was leader, so thats irrelevant. In fact, it's all irrelevant, the relevant thing is his lousy politics.10 acres of land in Surrey and a house in Kentish Town are part of it. However the increase in value of those is just 30% over that period.
Exactly: and Corbyn had better politics and owned littleHe didn't own the Surrey land before he was leader, so thats irrelevant. In fact, it's all irrelevant, the relevant thing is his lousy politics.
I grew up a few streets from his place, anyone who bought 25+ years ago is looking at 1-3 million in value…10 acres of land in Surrey and a house in Kentish Town are part of it. However the increase in value of those is just 30% over that period.