Keir Starmer's time is up

[Pickman's model]

Apparently, this is bullshit that Luke Akehurst put out to muddy the water, it is perfectly legal and justified to feed your activists, they are going to vote for you anyway.

Treating only applies to feeding voters.

I thought akehurst would be a great shammer fan

 

[teqniq]

Bullshit and Luke Akehurst, who would've guessed?

 

[Whagwan]

I thought akehurst would be a great shammer fan

He is, hence why he made up a bullshit lie about not being allowed to feed activists.

 

[Pickman's model]

He is, hence why he made up a bullshit lie about not being allowed to feed activists.

Which makes shammer and his party look like the wankers they are. Peculiar way to behave

 

[teqniq]

Ostrich logic:

 

[The39thStep]

Apparently, this is bullshit that Luke Akehurst put out to muddy the water, it is perfectly legal and justified to feed your activists, they are going to vote for you anyway.

Treating only applies to feeding voters.

Very surprised that urban posters fall for Akehursts bullshit tbh

 

[Artaxerxes]

Very surprised that urban posters fall for Akehursts bullshit tbh

I don’t even know who he is it’s how I interpreted a former councillors comments on the matter when I asked

 

[Whagwan]

I wish I didn't know who Nuke Akehurst is.

 

[The39thStep]

I don’t even know who he is it’s how I interpreted a former councillors comments on the matter when I asked

Perhaps they follow Luke Akehurst?

 

[Karl Masks]

Ostrich logic:

the Jam Man strikes again! From beyond the grave, he strikes terror!

myfuckinggodthesepeople

 

[DotCommunist]

I wish I didn't know who Nuke Akehurst is.

betroot beria.

 

[FridgeMagnet]

Well, Sir Starmer carries on with the purge of the far left with (check notes) Sadiq Khan?

"We’ve got to look at the result. The mayor needs to reflect. And it’s too early to say what should happen next."

(From guardian livestream)

 

[teqniq]

Well, Sir Starmer carries on with the purge of the far left with (check notes) Sadiq Khan?


(From guardian livestream)

Funny that, because...

 

[The39thStep]

Well, Sir Starmer carries on with the purge of the far left with (check notes) Sadiq Khan?


(From guardian livestream)

Thankfully the Mayor wont be alone in reflecting

 

[teqniq]

Lobbying. One of the major reasons for the ills of politics:

Lobbyist set to win role on policy-shaping Labour group

Director whose lobbying firm represents BlackRock and Police Federation seeks place on party’s conference committee

www.opendemocracy.net

 

[hitmouse]

Which makes shammer and his party look like the wankers they are. Peculiar way to behave

Think you've got your wires crossed here, if the line about it being illegal to feed people is true then kid/activist starver's done nothing wrong and is only complying with the law, it's if it's untrue that they've chosen to be dicks. No idea what the actual legality of it is, but if it is the case that there were Labour activists kicking off because they're used to being fed on these occasions, that would suggest that it probably isn't an actual law.

 

[Gramsci]

Well, Sir Starmer carries on with the purge of the far left with (check notes) Sadiq Khan?


(From guardian livestream)

Well Yes.

I dont think Starmer is keen on Mayors. To much independence. Unlike the MPs he cant really keep them on a tight leash.

What irritates me about blaming Khan is that Khan is just doing a sensible policy that does not cost a lot.

After all Rachel Reeves and Starmer say that money for green policies will not be available due to economic situation. That policies should be developed that do not mean increase in public debt.

ULEZ is such a policy.

Yet Starmer is not defending Khan and making argument for this kind on policy. Which is a public health issue.

So for Green issues/ public health issues what is Starmer going to do?

He could say scrappage scheme for old cars should get more government funding. But he is not going to say that as it costs.

Agree with you that Starmer is starting to see Mayors as a political obstacle to his leadership. Hes that authoritarian.

 

[Raheem]

Well, Sir Starmer carries on with the purge of the far left with (check notes) Sadiq Khan?

I honestly think the "far left" starts pretty close to the centre for KS, and he'll purge as far as he can get away with.

 

[Karl Masks]

Ulez is going to be the thing that costs him the Election isn't it

 

[Whagwan]

TBF to him Sadiq Khan was one of the 48 rebels who voted against the 2015 welfare bill Labour abstained on (which introduced the two-child cap) so definitely too far left for Starmer.

 

[TopCat]

This is cheery

View attachment 384019

Hey they made a difficult decision.

 

[two sheds]

Fiscal responsibility

 

[SpookyFrank]

Ulez is going to be the thing that costs him the Election isn't it

Some people, in fact most people, don't live in London and don't give a shit about ULEZ.

 

[Karl Masks]

Some people, in fact most people, don't live in London and don't give a shit about ULEZ.

While others will be bamboozled by wedge issue culture war artifacts of which this will be one

 

[Elpenor]

Starmer won’t like mayors as he doesn’t like devolution. He wants everything centralised within a tightly controlled party machine with all the power held by the leader

 

[Sue]

Some people, in fact most people, don't live in London and don't give a shit about ULEZ.

And loads and loads of people in London think it's a good thing.

 

[teqniq]

This is pretty nail on the head:

As Keir Starmer and co parrot George Osborne's justification for austerity, it's increasingly clear Labour won't deliver real change – Stewart McDonald

 

[Pickman's model]

Starmer won’t like mayors as he doesn’t like devolution. He wants everything centralised within a tightly controlled party machine with all the power held by the leader

But only if the leader is shammer

 

[Pickman's model]

While others will be bamboozled by wedge issue culture war artifacts of which this will be one

You're easily bamboozled

 

[two sheds]

This is pretty nail on the head:

As Keir Starmer and co parrot George Osborne's justification for austerity, it's increasingly clear Labour won't deliver real change – Stewart McDonald

It's fucking silly - there's loads of money around. Profiteering from covid, energy, water, railways, landlords, millionaires, billionaires ... Windfall taxes would pay for the first round of payrises/investment in infrastructure that we need.