Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

If people like 'Karl Masks' (probably banned returner 'glitchhiker') were serious about politics they could very easily put their time and energy into doing the right things/what needs to be done (doing their bit to create and build revolutionary/militant autonoumous alternatives from below). But they're not, instead they insist on merely putting an X on a ballot sheet to vote for a racist, right wing political party who are for the interests of the bouregeosie. Its pathetic.
 
Last edited:
i think there is a misunderstanding here: I don't look at the ballot box as a solution. It is a means to achieving some benefits along the way.
But you do. Your position that absolutely under all circumstances people must vote is making the ballot box key. It is providing cover for the liberals, and pushing the Labour Party to the right.
 
If people like 'Karl Masks' (AKA glitchhiker) were serious about politics they could very easily put their time and energy into doing the right things (doing their bit to create and build revolutionary/militant autonoumous alternatives from below). But they're not, instead they insist on merely putting an X on a ballot sheet to vote for a racist, right wing political party who are for the interests of the bouregeosie. Its pathetic.
Frankly I'd have (a little) more respect for Wells if he did join the Labour Party. At least that would show he is willing to put his effort (and money) where his mouth is.
 
But you do. Your position that absolutely under all circumstances people must vote is making the ballot box key. It is providing cover for the liberals, and pushing the Labour Party to the right.
Why do you keep ignoring the nuance? All that does is sacrifice people's wellbeing on the altar of ideology.
 
AA can do doubt be abrasive when in full flow, but they're also very clear on their proposed solutions. The salient word here is "credible," which is, essentially, the root of the entire debate. Imv, and for a lot of others on here, the non-credible solution is to fuss over ballot boxes that have, objectively, provided a solidly anti-working class influence on the movement of Britain's economy for as long as most of us have been alive, under both Tory and Labour governments. And in fact the only serious possibility for pressure in the other direction, for which there are no shortcuts, ballot based or otherwise, is to rebuild and reinvent organs of independent working class power that can exercise leverage against the State whoever happens to be in charge. Essentially, a counter power to that which the capitalist class have so successfully used again and again to get their way, showcased in its full iron fisted glory only last month.
They aren't clear. They may think they are, but I don't see clarity. I see circularity. Anarchism is great if you're an anarchist. But for everyone else there is a huge leap to be made. People like AA never bridge that gap. I've no doubt an anarchist society would be preferrable. But saying that doesn't make it a reality nor does it persuade people so.
 
Why anyone these days seriously thinks any politicians deserve their vote I really don't know. You'll get what you vote for and you'll be fully responsible to the harm done if who you vote for gains power, I won't be though.

I just want working class communities to be empowered rather than the ruling class. I just want us to be on the right track in strengthening the working class and proplery resisting capitalism and practising proper solidarity.
We all want that, but you have not explained how
 
We all want that, but you have not explained how
No one can state that they have all the definitive answers on how to create a revolution and a decent post-revolutionary society necessarily. There is only a rough guide on how it might be done really I suppose. But trying to create and build a strong autonoumous, revolutionary movement from below that unites as many people to resist capitalism as possible would be a start and there are all sorts of ways that people can contribute to that.
 
Last edited:
No one can state that they have all the definitive answers on how to create a revolution and a decent post-revolutionary society necessarily. There is only a rough guide on how it might be done really I suppose. But creating and building a strong autonoumous, revolutionary movement from below that unites as many people to resist capitalism as possible would be a start and there are all sorts of ways that people can contribute to that.
You're dodging the question. If you want people to be anarchist then you are going to have to explain how that will work because the first question anyone will ask is precisely that. You are not arguing against a neutral backdrop, you are talking to people born and raised under and socialised to capitalism.

So again, how are you going to build strong autonomous revolutionary movements from below? What does that look like or mean? I mentioned circularity before, this is exactly why. You are essentially saying "in order to be anarchist we have to be anarchist". It's a great philosophy if you're already one. But for the wider society and people you, presumably, want to disuade from voting then how will you do this? What do you expect those people to do in the meantime when there's a general election imminent and the prospect of a returning tory party?

I can guarantee that average worker's response to your statement will be to point out that you are advocating something you can't even explain
 
I would have to look at the balance of labour vs the tories. The bottom line is which is the worse outcome since one of them is going to win whether we like it or not.

If there better option then put it on the table. This shouldn't be an excuse to play into capitalism's divide and rule

Why people find this funny when people are fucking dying escapes me. All the pretend class warriors laughing at other working class. What a great look that is.
People are dying because of the system you support and nobody's laughing. That you and many others continue to urge support for this murderous system is tragic rather than humorous.

Anyway, I'm not telling you not to vote. Do so if it'll make you feel better. I will say though that your expectations of what a right wing Labour Party will do to improve the lot of the working class are wildly unrealistic.
 
how are you going to build strong autonomous revolutionary movements from below?
I can't claim to be any kind of expert, but really no one is. And theres no magic formula that can guarantee success.

Theres a whole list of grass roots, autonomous things that people can get together and do and get involved with, for example -

Propaganda/media - creating/contributing to/ distributing freesheets, website articles, leaflets, pamphlets etc, creating/putting up stickers, subvertising, attending/supporting pickets of workers, graffitti, making or contributing to podcasts or videos, having a presence on protests and getting involved in campaigns. Organising/attending/contributing to organising public meetings or organising meetings of like-minded people with a view to doing stuff or to discuss organising etc, getting involved with and having influence in/organising in a union, practicing social insertion/especifismo (which has had some success in South America). Getting involved with community organising and/or learning about it. Organising stalls and radical bookfairs, donating radical books to bookshops and libraries, setting up or getting involved with a reading/study group.

In the workplace - agitating, occupying, sabotaging, working to rule and subversion in the workplaces (and community), refusing to pay their prices or their rent, and striking when WE decide if it’s time to strike, not when union bureaucrats and the state give us permission to. Plus ofcourse, creating and/or participating in our own, horizontally organised groups and organisations, affinity groups, mutual aid groups, food kitchens and unofficial unions.

And for example, when workers aren’t paid the wages owed them, rather than asking the government to give us better legal protection, we take action to force employers to pay. Such things have been achieved with only a few dozen people. Renters unions have had many successes such as getting repairs done and refusing to pay rent increases, sometimes with only a handful of people. Setting up or getting involved with a claimants union. Getting together with others to resist, organise and practise mutual aid, including - collective expropriation (shop-lifting) and squatting. Strategic holism - focussing on the four fields of action: individual learning and inquisitiveness, interpersonal relations, social structures, and environmental structures.

These are all things that groups of people can do (and some of these things can be done by individuals) and they can be done effectively in a grass roots and autonomous way. And there are groups/orgs that do just some of these things but not necessarily all of them (for example there are groups/orgs that are mainly propaganda groups) and then hopefully grow and build on this and do more.

Imagine the power we could wield in our workplaces and our communities if thousands of us decided to refuse to be walked on, oppressed and exploited any longer, and began to act autonomously from below. We can do our bit in all these varying ways to choose from instead of just putting an X on a ballot sheet and relying on politicians and political parties and handing over our power to them and we need an autonomous grass roots movement to atleast hold the politicians etc to account so that we're not just dependent on them. We need our own power - in the workplaces and communities.

And, if you ask me, all the good things we think of as having been created by the state – free healthcare, free education, health & safety laws to protect us at work, housing regulations, sick pay, unemployment benefits, pensions – came about historically to put an end to organised campaigns of collective direct action etc that threatened the power of the ruling class and their state.
 
Last edited:
does Keir say anything -- at all -- about the various strikes going on / planned? i'm really curious to know how he plans to win votes from nurses, border guards etc if he sticks to the tory line on strikes
 
i'm really curious to know how he plans to win votes from nurses, border guards etc if he sticks to the tory line on strikes

does he care?

the mandelson 'they haven't got anywhere else to go' approach, and being more interested in attracting floating voters / tories?

wonder if the limp dems will try to position themselves left of labour next time?
 
You're dodging the question. If you want people to be anarchist then you are going to have to explain how that will work because the first question anyone will ask is precisely that. You are not arguing against a neutral backdrop, you are talking to people born and raised under and socialised to capitalism.

So again, how are you going to build strong autonomous revolutionary movements from below? What does that look like or mean? I mentioned circularity before, this is exactly why. You are essentially saying "in order to be anarchist we have to be anarchist". It's a great philosophy if you're already one. But for the wider society and people you, presumably, want to disuade from voting then how will you do this? What do you expect those people to do in the meantime when there's a general election imminent and the prospect of a returning tory party?
I mean, maybe this doesn't count as a revolutionary movement as such, but within the last few months we've seen a widescale grassroots movement calling for the nonpayment of energy bills, following which the conservatives announced their intention to cap the price of energy bills rather than leaving it to the free market. That's a practical example of non-electoral direct action winning real things that make people's lives better, waiting for a Labour government in 2024 or whenever would not have done that. Similarly, we have the RMT, CWU, and NHS union disputes, all of which have the potential to seriously humble this government and kick big holes in their agenda.

The thing that does my head in isn't whether people vote or not - when the day comes, vote Labour, vote Green, vote Lib Dem if that's what your heart wants, it's no skin off my nose - it's, as redsquirrel says above, the reduction of politics to voting, so we get these endless discussions about "what do you reckon you'll do in a general election that hasn't been announced yet", when there's so much we can be doing between now and then. The same thing doesn't happen with other forms of political activity, no-one goes around starting discussions on "if there's hypothetically another post strike at some point in 2023 or 2024 what are you going to do about it?" or "if you found out one of your neighbours was facing eviction at some point in 2024 how would you react?"
 
does Keir say anything -- at all -- about the various strikes going on / planned? i'm really curious to know how he plans to win votes from nurses, border guards etc if he sticks to the tory line on strikes
Not a direct message from Sir QC himself, but ska posted the latest good word from the Labour front bench upthread:

Labour will take on “hostile” health unions holding back the NHS, the shadow health secretary has said.
In an interview with The Telegraph, Wes Streeting warned that the NHS was “a service, not a shrine” and needed to “reform or die”.
Mr Streeting – who revealed that he has been waiting for months for delayed scans after cancer treatment – said the health service faced an “existential crisis”, with “appalling” difficulties accessing care.
He said the public had sacrificed “a lot of their lives and liberty” to prevent the NHS from being overwhelmed during repeated lockdowns, only to see it now “collapsed” around them.
His stance strikes a new tone for Labour, which relies heavily on union support and has accepted more than £15 million from unions involved in this winter’s strikes since Sir Keir Starmer became leader.
As the NHS braces for a wave of industrial action by nurses and paramedics, the shadow minister urged all unions to put patients first.
Mr Streeting said a Labour government could not afford the pay rises nurses are seeking, but criticised ministers for failing to negotiate on pay or get round the table when strikes were mooted.
The MP for Ilford North said that if Labour won the election he would not hesitate to take on unions holding back the cause of patients, singling out the British Medical Association (BMA) for being “hostile” to the idea that patients should expect better standards.
“One of the things that I do find frustrating, given that we have committed to more staff, I cannot understand why the BMA is so hostile to the idea that with more staff must come better standards for patients,” he said, accusing the union of “living on a different planet”.

“Whenever I point out the appalling state of access to primary care, where [a] record two million people are waiting more than a month to see a GP, I am treated like some sort of heretic by the BMA – who seem to think any criticism of patient access to primary care is somehow an attack on GPs,” he added.
“If anyone in the NHS thinks that they can demand more investment without demonstrating better standards for patients, they’ve got another think coming. We are not going to have a ‘something for nothing’ culture in the NHS with Labour.”
 
Yes, because nurses aren't striking at least in part because long term low retention and nonexistent recruitment is having far more of a dangerous impact on care than two days of stoppages could ever have. Fuck off Streeting you vacuous Tory twat.
Indeed, I'm impressed at how important MPs are saying the ambulance service is during the strike periods while they normally don't seem to give much of a fuck.
 
Here he is whooping with joy as England score against Wales. The useless cunt

keir-starmer-watches-england-wales-world-cup-match.jpg
 
"We are not going to have a ‘something for nothing’ culture in the NHS with Labour.”

Fantastic stuff

Does keeping the NHS as an institution viable for at least the medium term not count as 'something' to these fucking people? Does the endless, everyday grind of overworked staff not count as something? Utter arseholes. There's no ignorance defence for this kind of shit, it's just outright malice.
 
Does keeping the NHS as an institution viable for at least the medium term not count as 'something' to these fucking people? Does the endless, everyday grind of overworked staff not count as something? Utter arseholes. There's no ignorance defence for this kind of shit, it's just outright malice.
I didn't even realise how fucking bad that sentence is until Flavour highlighted it, but it's also a direct fuck you to the founding principles of the NHS, "free at the point of delivery" and "based on clinical need, not ability to pay" literally mean people getting something for nothing. I think Streeting is probably too thick to realise what he was actually saying there, but it's not great either way.
 
Back
Top Bottom