Louis MacNeice
Autumn Journalist
And afterall that's what really matters.I won't be though.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
And afterall that's what really matters.I won't be though.
But you do. Your position that absolutely under all circumstances people must vote is making the ballot box key. It is providing cover for the liberals, and pushing the Labour Party to the right.i think there is a misunderstanding here: I don't look at the ballot box as a solution. It is a means to achieving some benefits along the way.
Frankly I'd have (a little) more respect for Wells if he did join the Labour Party. At least that would show he is willing to put his effort (and money) where his mouth is.If people like 'Karl Masks' (AKA glitchhiker) were serious about politics they could very easily put their time and energy into doing the right things (doing their bit to create and build revolutionary/militant autonoumous alternatives from below). But they're not, instead they insist on merely putting an X on a ballot sheet to vote for a racist, right wing political party who are for the interests of the bouregeosie. Its pathetic.
Why do you keep ignoring the nuance? All that does is sacrifice people's wellbeing on the altar of ideology.But you do. Your position that absolutely under all circumstances people must vote is making the ballot box key. It is providing cover for the liberals, and pushing the Labour Party to the right.
They aren't clear. They may think they are, but I don't see clarity. I see circularity. Anarchism is great if you're an anarchist. But for everyone else there is a huge leap to be made. People like AA never bridge that gap. I've no doubt an anarchist society would be preferrable. But saying that doesn't make it a reality nor does it persuade people so.AA can do doubt be abrasive when in full flow, but they're also very clear on their proposed solutions. The salient word here is "credible," which is, essentially, the root of the entire debate. Imv, and for a lot of others on here, the non-credible solution is to fuss over ballot boxes that have, objectively, provided a solidly anti-working class influence on the movement of Britain's economy for as long as most of us have been alive, under both Tory and Labour governments. And in fact the only serious possibility for pressure in the other direction, for which there are no shortcuts, ballot based or otherwise, is to rebuild and reinvent organs of independent working class power that can exercise leverage against the State whoever happens to be in charge. Essentially, a counter power to that which the capitalist class have so successfully used again and again to get their way, showcased in its full iron fisted glory only last month.
We all want that, but you have not explained howWhy anyone these days seriously thinks any politicians deserve their vote I really don't know. You'll get what you vote for and you'll be fully responsible to the harm done if who you vote for gains power, I won't be though.
I just want working class communities to be empowered rather than the ruling class. I just want us to be on the right track in strengthening the working class and proplery resisting capitalism and practising proper solidarity.
No one can state that they have all the definitive answers on how to create a revolution and a decent post-revolutionary society necessarily. There is only a rough guide on how it might be done really I suppose. But trying to create and build a strong autonoumous, revolutionary movement from below that unites as many people to resist capitalism as possible would be a start and there are all sorts of ways that people can contribute to that.We all want that, but you have not explained how
You're dodging the question. If you want people to be anarchist then you are going to have to explain how that will work because the first question anyone will ask is precisely that. You are not arguing against a neutral backdrop, you are talking to people born and raised under and socialised to capitalism.No one can state that they have all the definitive answers on how to create a revolution and a decent post-revolutionary society necessarily. There is only a rough guide on how it might be done really I suppose. But creating and building a strong autonoumous, revolutionary movement from below that unites as many people to resist capitalism as possible would be a start and there are all sorts of ways that people can contribute to that.
People are dying because of the system you support and nobody's laughing. That you and many others continue to urge support for this murderous system is tragic rather than humorous.I would have to look at the balance of labour vs the tories. The bottom line is which is the worse outcome since one of them is going to win whether we like it or not.
If there better option then put it on the table. This shouldn't be an excuse to play into capitalism's divide and rule
Why people find this funny when people are fucking dying escapes me. All the pretend class warriors laughing at other working class. What a great look that is.
I can't claim to be any kind of expert, but really no one is. And theres no magic formula that can guarantee success.how are you going to build strong autonomous revolutionary movements from below?
i'm really curious to know how he plans to win votes from nurses, border guards etc if he sticks to the tory line on strikes
I mean, maybe this doesn't count as a revolutionary movement as such, but within the last few months we've seen a widescale grassroots movement calling for the nonpayment of energy bills, following which the conservatives announced their intention to cap the price of energy bills rather than leaving it to the free market. That's a practical example of non-electoral direct action winning real things that make people's lives better, waiting for a Labour government in 2024 or whenever would not have done that. Similarly, we have the RMT, CWU, and NHS union disputes, all of which have the potential to seriously humble this government and kick big holes in their agenda.You're dodging the question. If you want people to be anarchist then you are going to have to explain how that will work because the first question anyone will ask is precisely that. You are not arguing against a neutral backdrop, you are talking to people born and raised under and socialised to capitalism.
So again, how are you going to build strong autonomous revolutionary movements from below? What does that look like or mean? I mentioned circularity before, this is exactly why. You are essentially saying "in order to be anarchist we have to be anarchist". It's a great philosophy if you're already one. But for the wider society and people you, presumably, want to disuade from voting then how will you do this? What do you expect those people to do in the meantime when there's a general election imminent and the prospect of a returning tory party?
Not a direct message from Sir QC himself, but ska posted the latest good word from the Labour front bench upthread:does Keir say anything -- at all -- about the various strikes going on / planned? i'm really curious to know how he plans to win votes from nurses, border guards etc if he sticks to the tory line on strikes
Labour will take on “hostile” health unions holding back the NHS, the shadow health secretary has said.
In an interview with The Telegraph, Wes Streeting warned that the NHS was “a service, not a shrine” and needed to “reform or die”.
Mr Streeting – who revealed that he has been waiting for months for delayed scans after cancer treatment – said the health service faced an “existential crisis”, with “appalling” difficulties accessing care.
He said the public had sacrificed “a lot of their lives and liberty” to prevent the NHS from being overwhelmed during repeated lockdowns, only to see it now “collapsed” around them.
His stance strikes a new tone for Labour, which relies heavily on union support and has accepted more than £15 million from unions involved in this winter’s strikes since Sir Keir Starmer became leader.
As the NHS braces for a wave of industrial action by nurses and paramedics, the shadow minister urged all unions to put patients first.
Mr Streeting said a Labour government could not afford the pay rises nurses are seeking, but criticised ministers for failing to negotiate on pay or get round the table when strikes were mooted.
The MP for Ilford North said that if Labour won the election he would not hesitate to take on unions holding back the cause of patients, singling out the British Medical Association (BMA) for being “hostile” to the idea that patients should expect better standards.
“One of the things that I do find frustrating, given that we have committed to more staff, I cannot understand why the BMA is so hostile to the idea that with more staff must come better standards for patients,” he said, accusing the union of “living on a different planet”.
“Whenever I point out the appalling state of access to primary care, where [a] record two million people are waiting more than a month to see a GP, I am treated like some sort of heretic by the BMA – who seem to think any criticism of patient access to primary care is somehow an attack on GPs,” he added.
“If anyone in the NHS thinks that they can demand more investment without demonstrating better standards for patients, they’ve got another think coming. We are not going to have a ‘something for nothing’ culture in the NHS with Labour.”
yesWhat would really help would be adding none of the above to GE ballots, but importantly, counting those votes. I want n.o.t.a to win a GE, see what happens then.
Has anyone actually said this? Seems like tilting at windmills to me.If anyone in the NHS thinks that they can demand more investment without demonstrating better standards for patients, they’ve got another think coming.
Has anyone actually said this? Seems like tilting at windmills to me.
"We are not going to have a ‘something for nothing’ culture in the NHS with Labour.”
Fantastic stuff
Indeed, I'm impressed at how important MPs are saying the ambulance service is during the strike periods while they normally don't seem to give much of a fuck.Yes, because nurses aren't striking at least in part because long term low retention and nonexistent recruitment is having far more of a dangerous impact on care than two days of stoppages could ever have. Fuck off Streeting you vacuous Tory twat.
I don't think that everyone does want that, but if you do then surely you'd try to work towards that goal with others.We all want that
that looks more like a man who doesn't know what he's doing - his face reads 'am i supposed to be doing this?'Here he is whooping with joy as England score against Wales. The useless cunt
sir kc i think you'll findNot a direct message from Sir QC himself, but ska posted the latest good word from the Labour front bench upthread:
"We are not going to have a ‘something for nothing’ culture in the NHS with Labour.”
Fantastic stuff
I didn't even realise how fucking bad that sentence is until Flavour highlighted it, but it's also a direct fuck you to the founding principles of the NHS, "free at the point of delivery" and "based on clinical need, not ability to pay" literally mean people getting something for nothing. I think Streeting is probably too thick to realise what he was actually saying there, but it's not great either way.Does keeping the NHS as an institution viable for at least the medium term not count as 'something' to these fucking people? Does the endless, everyday grind of overworked staff not count as something? Utter arseholes. There's no ignorance defence for this kind of shit, it's just outright malice.
that looks more like a man who doesn't know what he's doing - his face reads 'am i supposed to be doing this?'