danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Yes, towards the cliff!Is that the bit where the car is rolling backwards?
Yes, towards the cliff!Is that the bit where the car is rolling backwards?
I'd like to put myself forward for the role of Luke throwing up at the side in this analogy.Yes, towards the cliff!
agree it was from this time, but i think it mainly came off the back of Help for Heroes - Wikipedia (launched 2007)more than the military itself, though they sail in the wake/support itand another thing - i think another thing that can be laid at blair's door is the way in which the armed forces have become so much more central to the country's way of seeing itself. sure, there was always the act of remembrance on 11 november or nearest sunday. but there wasn't always the armed forces covenant (tho arguably there should have been, the treatment of veterans has long been a stain on the mod) and there wasn't armed forces day or the slavish worship of military terms, the way in which the bbc for some years, maybe still does, describe things as being done with military precision. there's been a concerted effort to resituate the military in the public consciousness, into which so many people have bought as veterans from the greater wars, from ww1 and ww2, have died away. the frankly mawkish way in which poppies now adorn tube trains and dustcarts. for me that's all down to the wars too.
But why did Help for Heroes have success? Because of Iraq and Afghanistan. If British soldiers hadn't been killing and being killed at the time, it would never have been created. And the renewal of the poppy appeal as something that isn't at all about 'lest we forget' but is explicitly about those who are dying now again is wholly down to Blair's wars. It is a normalisation of permanent war.agree it was from this time, but i think it mainly came off the back of Help for Heroes - Wikipedia (launched 2007)more than the military itself, though they sail in the wake/support it
SSAFA, the Armed Forces charity are the real dealBut why did Help for Heroes have success? Because of Iraq and Afghanistan. If British soldiers hadn't been killing and being killed at the time, it would never have been created. And the renewal of the poppy appeal as something that isn't at all about 'lest we forget' but is explicitly about those who are dying now again is wholly down to Blair's wars. It is a normalisation of permanent war.
Totally agree, with you and Pickman's.... Just adding that my perception ( unproven) is HfH played a key role and that the charity does seem to have been a grassroots affair in its inception, which caught the public mood supposedly after the Lee Rigby murder. That slightly changes the nature of the military support... It's not just been dumped on us from aboveBut why did Help for Heroes have success? Because of Iraq and Afghanistan. If British soldiers hadn't been killing and being killed at the time, it would never have been created. And the renewal of the poppy appeal as something that isn't at all about 'lest we forget' but is explicitly about those who are dying now again is wholly down to Blair's wars. It is a normalisation of permanent war.
Oh jesus, I hope we're not going down that road of hand on heart "Thank-you for your service" bullshit here. Not only is it gag-worthy, but I was watching something on Netflix where the host did it and the guy was a military paralegal for chrissakes. I'm sure he's risked his life getting papercuts for democracy.And the increased militarisation of everyday life
I would say that we're already a long way down that road.Oh jesus, I hope we're not going down that road of hand on heart "Thank-you for your service" bullshit here. Not only is it gag-worthy, but I was watching something on Netflix where the host did it and the guy was a military paralegal for chrissakes. I'm sure he's risked his life getting papercuts for democracy.
Another example of how The Meja and social media are not real life.I have literally not seen a single poppy worn by an actual person this year. It's a lip service thing for public service broadcast types and politicians, the vast majority of people don't bother
Yes, this is true, and much more so than usual. Because, like you say, literally not one person. And round here is very true blue — normally, I would see at least a bit of poppy wearing by now. Not sure what’s going on, to be honest.I have literally not seen a single poppy worn by an actual person this year. It's a lip service thing for public service broadcast types and politicians, the vast majority of people don't bother
Depends where you live, I've seen loads, including hundreds of poppies on lampposts, Street sellers etcI have literally not seen a single poppy worn by an actual person this year. It's a lip service thing for public service broadcast types and politicians, the vast majority of people don't bother
Actually that's a fair point. In previous years there were loads but less this year. Local to me, there's this dickead whose house is decked out with England flags, poppy flags and lest we forget crap, but that's there all year round. The knob.I have literally not seen a single poppy worn by an actual person this year. It's a lip service thing for public service broadcast types and politicians, the vast majority of people don't bother
it was the same with the queen dying - hardly anyone real gave much of a fuck beyond the bank holiday, but every shop, bar, company twitter account, newsreader and politician was decked out in black. It's like a weird parallel reality.There is certainly institutional poppying. It’s on lampposts and businesses. But I’ve not seen them on individuals
Seen more jehovah's witnesses than poppy sellersActually that's a fair point. In previous years there were loads but less this year. Local to me, there's this dickead whose house is decked out with England flags, poppy flags and lest we forget crap, but that's there all year round. The knob.
But why did Help for Heroes have success?
I read an article a while ago (sadly I've not been able to find it again) that made a fairly convincing case that the rise in support for the military (including stuff like Help for Heroes and the like) among working class communities is because the military is one of the few remaining big employers for kids from those communities, and one of the most visible routes to success for many of them as a result.
But he's not a Tory Danny!People who are calling for a #GeneralElectionNOW need to address this stuff. The anti immigrant rhetoric, the “arrest protesters” chat, his personal connections with private healthcare concerns, the anti working class neoliberalism… What are we supporting here? Him literally just not being Sunak?
This is the harm of Anti-Toryism. The removal of any coherent politics into just a dislike of the colour blue.Ok, well, we have to hope that not too many anti-tories hold similar views, or it's continued Tory rule for us. And to be clear - I think that's worse.
At the moment it just looks like he’s promising efficient evil instead of inefficient evil. Hmm. Haud me back.
And our communities are actively targeted by the Armed Forces in particular for that reason.I read an article a while ago (sadly I've not been able to find it again) that made a fairly convincing case that the rise in support for the military (including stuff like Help for Heroes and the like) among working class communities is because the military is one of the few remaining big employers for kids from those communities, and one of the most visible routes to success for many of them as a result.
Tbh it isn't even liberalism but toryism in a pink jacketBut he's not a Tory Danny!
This is the harm of Anti-Toryism. The removal of any coherent politics into just a dislike of the colour blue.
There is no way in fuck I'm going to vote Labour, especially not for Hilary Benn.
That does not mean I'm going to chest prod comrades that vote Labour out of some sort of forlorn hope, tribal loyalty or whatever.
Hell I voted Labour in 2017 and 2019, not because of political reasons but emotional ones - 2017 a surprised pleasure at a party issuing a social democratic manifesto for the first time in my (voting) life, 2019 in a knowingly useless attempt to give two fingers up to the labour right.
But the argument that socialists should throw their politics away and join liberals - fuck that.
And this is not based on some ideological purity, it is absolutely practical - liberalism is the problem. It is the cause of inequality, it is the reason that populisms are returning. Any real class politics has to be made not aligned to liberalism but in the face of it, as the gains of the working class during the middle/latter part of the 20th Century were.
Indeed the ideological purity is on the part of those that insist that socialists, communists, anarchist must give up their politics and support a "progressive alliance" that is utterly opposed to their politics.