ska invita
back on the other side
If he is fined, I suspect he will have choice but to resign.
haha i hadnt thought of that comedy
i cant see him resigning though no matter what
If he is fined, I suspect he will have choice but to resign.
interview hereApologies if I've missed the reference, but Seymour's article was a review of the interesting book by Oliver Eagleton, 'The Starmer Project' (Verso). Some good analysis of his CPS antics (apart from phone-hacking aspect). A bit harsh on McDonnell, his views would be interesting. Well worth a look: far superior to the drivel from that wind-sock Owen Jones. I have always thought Starmer scum: this book supplies chapter & verse.
time to move on....haha i hadnt thought of that comedy
i cant see him resigning though no matter what
Makes you want to vote Lib Dem if anythingThat's a pretty damning article TBH, i am not surprised.
In other news Labour seem to think this will be a vote winner. Not that I am a fan of the limp-dems but really?? is this the best that Labour could come up with?
View attachment 320543
Not looking good for him now:
Tbf she didn't exactly volunteer. She was goaded by the LBC reporter pressing her again and again with the hypothetical and she crumbled - which she should avoided. It's hard though, to duck the charges of hypocrisy. Margaret Beckett managed better in reframing the question on AnyQ.This Labour party really can turn so much as a hint of victory into defeat. Dianne Abbot piping up now to keep it in the news. Tories must be laughing their cocks off.
This has already been in the news for ages and doesn't seem to have affected shammer's party does it. We're just past the important point, the Thursday elections, and whatever comes out of this sordid little episode won't affect the party come the next electionsThis Labour party really can turn so much as a hint of victory into defeat. Dianne Abbot piping up now to keep it in the news. Tories must be laughing their cocks off.
We've been through this several times now. You have the memory of a forgetful goldfish.Does anyone know the difference between Starmer and a Tory? I cant see any. I always thought he was yet another tory infiltrator of the party to keep it down. I admit to delusions in the same way all humans have delusions. Also is he using Brylcreem?
Do you remember posting this?I apologise, but I still cant tell the difference between Starmer and a Tory. I have little doubt he wears pin striped suits, has gold cufflinks and drives a 1970`s Jag with leather seats and a walnut dashboard.
...and this was my replythe difference is starmer sits on the opposition benches.
and he drives a 1950s jag
the paint on the p has been in the wars, it should of course be R for rodney. which is sir keithly's middle name, the plonker
Yes why?Do you remember posting this?
If you were a discerning reader you would see that the two questions are not the same.We've been through this several times now. You have the memory of a forgetful goldfish.
To an ultrapedant the difference may be obvious but to anyone else the differences are of no consequenceIf you were a discerning reader you would see that the two questions are not the same.