Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Here we have a Labour Shadow Minister echoing the thoughts of the Adam Smith Institute, and attacking worker wage rises.

Unable to digest the lessons of the last period Labour’s position dooms it to the same fate as the lunatic remain fringe: both bound to dying neo-liberal orthodoxies.

Perhaps the thread needs to be re-titled ‘Labour’s Time is Up’..

 
As usual, Larry Elliot is right. Some of us have spent the last 5 years arguing “as Johnson is now doing – that leaving the EU presented an opportunity to restructure the economy and warned that if a party of the left did not make a positive case for change, then the vacuum would be filled by the right” and here we now are…
 
Depressing really. Johnson's high wage message is going to be quite simple and effective I think.

it'd be more effective if i and other public sector workers saw some evidence that our wages might in fact rise
 
Johnson's 'high wage economy' boasting is galling. It wasn't a planned, it was never mentioned in their election manifesto or economic planning. But, as is always the case with Johnson he's stupid but not that stupid to look a gift horse in the mouth. Leaving aside the disaster of Corbynism's capture by remain and the failure of the left to seize the opportunities presented by the vote, what's even more galling is that instead of learning lessons Labour is doubling down on its own vapid stupidity in response.

Labour could and should be welcoming the advent of the high wage economy but pointing out the flaws in the Tory version that they would rectify. It's fairly standard stuff - highlight that there is no evidence of the high wage economy for the state's own workers (as Pickman notes) with a public sector pay freeze affecting care workers for example and pledging a high wage economy in the public sector anchored by a national living wage of £15 an hour, note that a high wage economy needs sectoral collective bargaining across the economy that it would mandate, point to precarity and fire and re-hire as practices intolerable in a high wage economy and state it would outlaw them etc etc. Instead, it calls for more exploited labour. Pathetic.
 
Exactly - the government could lead the way to a high wage economy by increasing the pay for underpaid public sector workers. It's not complicated to rebut Johnson but instead we have 'wage price spirals'.
 
Traditional British Value that, the red wall will lap it up

Whilst you meant to be ironic you are inadvertently correct. In ‘the red wall areas’ people are noticing wages going up in some sectors, they welcome it. They also increasingly wonder why wages are not going up in other sectors and, hopefully, this will feed into a dynamic, disputes and agitation more widely. You are also correct that - bar the Labour Party and middle class liberals - there is no support for more exploited labour from the poorest parts of the EU.
 
Last edited:
Tend to agree, but I think Starmer's role was pretty central to Labour's Brexit disaster and it's high time he and his acolytes started taking some responsibility for it.

do they see it as a disaster? they stopped a corbyn government that might actually have done things that were vaguely socialist. they will see having a tory government (albeit a blue one not a red one) as a better outcome.
 
do they see it as a disaster? they stopped a corbyn government that might actually have done things that were vaguely socialist. they will see having a tory government (albeit a blue one not a red one) as a better outcome.
Depressing but true.
 
YG do need to update this graphic, (only goes to end August), but even so...it paints quite a bleak picture for Labour; the more people know of Special K, the less they approve:

1633797176166.png
 
Keith has decided to start another legal war which he looks unlikely to win. This only brings back into focus the fact that he is covering up the Forde report due to it's horrific contents.

 
I thought the suggestion in the press release was persuasive - that he's trying to get those five landed with Labour's costs in the court case against it.

Eta: may well help that result along though.
 
Last edited:
I thought the suggestion in the press release was persuasive - that he's trying to get those five landed with Labour's costs in the court case against it.

Eta: may well help that result along though.

Course he is. Him and his regime are only interested in spiteful vindictive revenge on anyone associated with Corbyn. they do nto give a shit about the party or getting elected.
 
Back
Top Bottom