danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
One and three are the salient points.tbf to Survation, most Westminster polling operates around 1k so, if they really did get 766 'Jewish voters', that wasn't the most tragic sample size for a poll.
One and three are the salient points.tbf to Survation, most Westminster polling operates around 1k so, if they really did get 766 'Jewish voters', that wasn't the most tragic sample size for a poll.
Agreed.One and three are the salient points.
I'm sure that there are Jews in all of the social class classifications, but what strikes me about Jewish Labour supporters is what an tiny demographic they really are.I don't think Corbyn's abysmal ratings among Jewish voters would have improved much with a bigger sample size, probably gone down tbh, although SNP/LD/etc would have probably improved their vote shares. It will take a long time for the damage to be repaired and complaining that Jews are part of the middle class (and what, many leftists and labour voters aren't?) Isn't going to cut it
Michael Rosen has been asking various questions of how they collected such a sample. That one was an 'opt-in' version which is unusual for them.tbf to Survation, most Westminster polling operates around 1k so, if they really did get 766 'Jewish voters', that wasn't the most tragic sample size for a poll.
The Jewish Labour support, which must be a sub-set of the 30k UK Jews that polling suggests respond as Labour supporters, are very obviously factionally riven into the various Labour Jewish affiliate groups. Given the small numbers that must be involved, the political commitment does, to me, look quite impressive in a way.What do you mean sorry?
Could be, I'm not sure.Think you might be getting cause and effect confused a bit there tbh.
the size is a perfectly reasonable number, albeit with a slightly larger margin of accuracy than their normal ones (about 4% with 95% confidence v3%). The question is over how those people were selected.Could be, I'm not sure.
Suppose what I'm getting at is that for groups that have been so 'centre-stage' in such a politically charged process for the LP, the actual constituencies are really small in terms of numbers.
Even the JLM reckons on only about 2.5k members and there are some CLPs with ward memberships bigger than that.
So when considering the Survation poll, maybe 766 wasn't such a bad sample?
Indeed.the size is a perfectly reasonable number, albeit with a slightly larger margin of accuracy than their normal ones. The question is over how those people were selected.
This is the sort of thing I was getting at above.Michael Rosen has been asking various questions of how they collected such a sample. That one was an 'opt-in' version which is unusual for them.
View attachment 242235
It'd be interesting to compare with the methodologies for 2015 (22%) and 2010 (31)
Yeah, haven't checked out the methodology, tbh.Yeah, I usually tick none or other on those what religion are you boxes. Nobody knows how many secular Jews there are so to get ‘Jewish voters’ you’ll miss all the ones who don’t tick that religion box.
No, if it were doubled that would still be a massive drop off even since MIliband, so arguing over whether it should be 6, 8 or even 12 misses most of the point.I really don't think it would have underestimated it by any more than a few % tbh.
So the question is, are British Jews now predominantly middle class? I'd suggest they probably are.
It doesn’t matter. What matters is that rummo is looking at this the wrong way. The Jewishness is not where the issue lies, it’s the class of the people being focused on.Have you read anything that confirms this? Are you basing your view on socio-economic meausres? I have read some things on median incomes/wealth by religion but an wondering what you are basing your opinions on.
Hence my second point which you have cropped from your quote of my post..It doesn’t matter. What matters is that rummo is looking at this the wrong way. The Jewishness is not where the issue lies, it’s the class of the people being focused on.
Well, that’s a separate point. rummo needs to be walked through this very slowly.Hence my second point which you have cropped from your quote of my post..
quickly out the door would work better for me.Well, that’s a separate point. rummo needs to be walked through this very slowly.
Exactly.Although saying a bunch of antisemitic dogwhistle stuff and then justifying it with 'but I'm just criticising them for being Tory voters and middle class!" also isnt great (not that you're doing this danny la rouge )
This is true. But since the problem is wider that just rummo , it’s worth other people thinking it all through step by step.quickly out the door would work better for me.