Confessions obtained under physical or psychological torture should not be relied upon as factual evidence.You know how JC's statement today says "To be clear, concerns about antisemitism are neither "exaggerated" nor "overstated"", either that word concerns is doing a lot of work in that sentence or did they get to him since his statement last week.
Carry on like that and Labour will end up like one of the fake parties that East Germany used to create a thin veneer of pluralism to cover one-party rule.The revisionist Starmerite clique seem to be upping its purge of leftists
And
Labour’s Bristol West Suspensions Are an Attack on Party Democracy
The suspension of the chair and co-secretary of Bristol West CLP over a motion supporting Jeremy Corbyn is a calculated attack on Labour members' rights and party democracy.tribunemag.co.uk
Both, I suspect. And he still hasn't got the whip back.You know how JC's statement today says "To be clear, concerns about antisemitism are neither "exaggerated" nor "overstated"", either that word concerns is doing a lot of work in that sentence or did they get to him since his statement last week.
I would say no as being an independent doesn't mean you are a member of another party.If he's not got the whip and is effectively standing as an independent, doesn't that mean he'll have to be expelled from Labour because he's a member of another party?
starmer's just looking like a whiny little shitThe suspension would have been ended anyway, I suspect, because they had no case. He hadn't broken any rule to justify it. They were directly going against the EHRC recommendations by suspending him in the first place.
My reading of his statement today is that it was aimed more at getting the whip back and having all this put behind him (Ha!). Clearly it has failed so far. Starmer wants to look hard. The Hard Centre.
Won't be the first time I've been led up the garden path by a leftist promising all the answers
Carry on like that and Labour will end up like one of the fake parties that East Germany used to create a thin veneer of pluralism to cover one-party rule.
And we know how that worked out in the end.
You know how JC's statement today says "To be clear, concerns about antisemitism are neither "exaggerated" nor "overstated"", either that word concerns is doing a lot of work in that sentence or did they get to him since his statement last week.
I'd say that, worse than that, he's looking like someone with zero political nous.starmer's just looking like a whiny little shit
With hindsight, of course, the leaked "The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014–2019" showed that the left were no where near ruthless enough in purging the right that sabotaged exploiting the institutional - and factional - barriers to reforming the complaints process.I'm not promising any answers! It's ok to say 'this could have been done better' without offering a fully formed alternative political programme.
I appreciate that there were institutional - and factional - barriers to reforming the complaints process that was in place when Corbyn became leader, but I don't accept they were insurmountable. More resources could have been given to sorting it out, and if complaints were held up for factional reasons the people responsible for holding things up could have been held responsible for it - and before anyone mentions the EHRC recommendations about political interference, the EHRC inquiry wasn't an inevitable result of this. If the political interference into the complaints process had been done correctly and in a timely fashion, and they'd got on top of it, there would have been no inquiry.
I think that they probably underestimated how much of a defining issue this would become until it was too late to effectively get a handle on it - I underestimated it myself - but there should have been more action taken on it because it was the right thing to do, not because of the damage it could cause the leadership. There is a rich seam of antisemitism that runs through the left, and rather than leaping defensively to whataboutery or denial when it comes up, we should be working on challenging, educating or excluding those who indulge in it (my own experience of challenging and educating is that it's fairly difficult, have to say - mostly because of the denial).
ok, a whiny little shit with all the political nous of a lobotomised earthwormI'd say that, worse than that, he's looking like someone with zero political nous.
With hindsight, of course, the leaked "The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014–2019" showed that the left were no where near ruthless enough in purging the right that sabotaged the institutional - and factional - barriers to reforming the complaints process.
Nor did the left realise the effectiveness of their opponents to amplify and project the antisemitism that did/does exist with in the party.
it was yesterday, not today. eta oh i see what you mean, he said this and the thing about 'the scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party', on the same day.'You know how JC's statement today'
If I've got this right that statement was made by Corbyn to the Labour Party on 29th October.
I'm not promising any answers! It's ok to say 'this could have been done better' without offering a fully formed alternative political programme.
I appreciate that there were institutional - and factional - barriers to reforming the complaints process that was in place when Corbyn became leader, but I don't accept they were insurmountable. More resources could have been given to sorting it out, and if complaints were held up for factional reasons the people responsible for holding things up could have been held responsible for it - and before anyone mentions the EHRC recommendations about political interference, the EHRC inquiry wasn't an inevitable result of this. If the political interference into the complaints process had been done correctly and in a timely fashion, and they'd got on top of it, there would have been no inquiry.
I think that they probably underestimated how much of a defining issue this would become until it was too late to effectively get a handle on it - I underestimated it myself - but there should have been more action taken on it because it was the right thing to do, not because of the damage it could cause the leadership. There is a rich seam of antisemitism that runs through the left, and rather than leaping defensively to whataboutery or denial when it comes up, we should be working on challenging, educating or excluding those who indulge in it (my own experience of challenging and educating is that it's fairly difficult, have to say - mostly because of the denial).
it was yesterday, not today. eta oh i see what you mean, he said this and the thing about it being exaggerated by their enemies on the same day.
With hindsight, of course, the leaked "The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014–2019" showed that the left were no where near ruthless enough in purging the right that sabotaged the institutional - and factional - barriers to reforming the complaints process.
yep edited. All perfectly clear now.Read the statement
'On the day I was suspended I gave a broadcast interview to clarify what I had said in response to the EHRC report, and I also made a statement to the party to clear up any confusion about what I had meant, as follows: ..............'
The thumb is on the scale, we know that. The Tories have a number of inbuilt advantages in this regard - their friends own all the media, and their voters and members don't care very much about bigotry.I largely agree, but again the tory party has done none of the chasing out of antisemites and islamophobes and homophobes. How have they got away with it when Labour hasn't?
Agreed - a broad church was always a fantasyWith hindsight, of course, the leaked "The work of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014–2019" showed that the left were no where near ruthless enough in purging the right that sabotaged exploiting the institutional - and factional - barriers to reforming the complaints process.
Oh, and I know this isn't what you're doing here, but the whole 'there is antisemitism in the Labour Party - as there is throughout society' schtick that Corbyn does is IMO a form of denial, a shrugging off of responsibility: it ignores that there's a fairly specific flavour of antisemitism in the Labour Party, which is quite different from the more widely indulged antisemitism.Nor did the left realise the effectiveness of their opponents to amplify and project the antisemitism that did/does exist with in the party.
Indeed not.Oh, and I know this isn't what you're doing here, but the whole 'there is antisemitism in the Labour Party - as there is throughout society' schtick that Corbyn does is IMO a form of denial, a shrugging off of responsibility: it ignores that there's a fairly specific flavour of antisemitism in the Labour Party, which is quite different from the more widely indulged antisemitism.
Yes. The antisemitism that's probably standard in the tory party is the same kind as is casually offered round like polite nibbles at dinner parties out here in the home counties, it is a lazy pretty apolitical sort of bigotry and a completely different flavour to the kind i've been around socially most of my life, they are not the same thing.Oh, and I know this isn't what you're doing here, but the whole 'there is antisemitism in the Labour Party - as there is throughout society' schtick that Corbyn does is IMO a form of denial, a shrugging off of responsibility: it ignores that there's a fairly specific flavour of antisemitism in the Labour Party, which is quite different from the more widely indulged antisemitism.
Tory antisemitism not so bad, then?Yes. The antisemitism that's probably standard in the tory party is the same kind as is casually offered round like polite nibbles at dinner parties out here in the home counties, it is a lazy pretty apolitical sort of bigotry and a completely different flavour to the kind i've been around socially most of my life, they are not the same thing.
The 'as there is throughout society' and look at the tories stuff feels like an absolute cop out or just plain ignorance every time i hear it. And I'm pretty sure that a couple of years back I'd not have felt stupidly grateful for someone on the internet stating this thing which seems to me a totally obvious fact but here we are.
Just standard. Do you expect them to not be racist?Tory antisemitism not so bad, then?
So, there's 'standard' antisemitism and 'non-standard' antisemitism, then?Just standard. Do you expect them to not be racist?
I expect a fairly large segment of english people to be the boring automatic unthinking kind of general racists with a side order of antisemitism that just comes with it, like a garnish. Thats what i mean by standard, standard issue basic no frills bigotry, like the daily mail, or the completely ordinary woman i met recently who called jews 'a sharp elbowed people', that. If you think the problem 'on the left' is that same thing just sprinkled at random through the population, then idk really how to assist.So, there's 'standard' antisemitism and 'non-standard' antisemitism, then?
The latter being qualitatively different to the former?
Interesting.
Well, a number of Tories have been promoting hardcore anti Semitic conspiracy theories from the far right ("cultural Marxism") recently, and the PM wrote a book with a hook nosed sex pervert chiselling Jew.Yes. The antisemitism that's probably standard in the tory party is the same kind as is casually offered round like polite nibbles at dinner parties out here in the home counties, it is a lazy pretty apolitical sort of bigotry and a completely different flavour to the kind i've been around socially most of my life, they are not the same thing.
The 'as there is throughout society' and look at the tories stuff feels like an absolute cop out or just plain ignorance every time i hear it. And I'm pretty sure that a couple of years back I'd not have felt stupidly grateful for someone on the internet stating this thing which seems to me a totally obvious fact but here we are.