It was only after the eighties that Labour really became so dominant. The tories would regularly be on 20+ seats from there earlier than that. And thereafter, either Labour were out of office or there majority was so big it didn't matter. I think 2005 was the other time, tho I'd have to go check.Oh really, I thought it was a big deal. It looks like a big deal when you see the coloured in maps.
Rats swimming toward a sinking shipIan Lavery claiming some MP's are thinking of quitting Labour:
Corbyn-supporting MPs discussed quitting Labour, Ian Lavery says
Exclusive: ex-party chair says fear of Starmer ‘purge’ may lead to MPs sitting as independentswww.theguardian.com
Looking forward to seeing the composition of the TUSC FOI grouping.Great news for left wing politics outside Labour, TUSC have relaunched! Their latest act is to... welcome Chris Williamson onto their steering committee.
Useful to know where all the cranks are going to head I guess.
Ex-MP Chris Williamson joins TUSC - Socialist Party
TUSC's steering committee welcomed five new members who are on the NECs of trade unions, and former Labour MP Chris Williamson.www.socialistparty.org.uk
....which dodges the issue that "The scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party, as well as by much of the media." Which it was. Is the new discipline just to never talk of it again? Especially the bit about "inside the party" needs bringing up again for sure.Looks like Corbyn has been told what he has to do before the investigation finds that his suspension will be ended:
View attachment 239228
those guys are the boss now, so yeah.....which dodges the issue that "The scale of the problem was also dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents inside and outside the party, as well as by much of the media." Which it was. Is the new discipline just to never talk of it again?
Up to you innit. But bear in mind that the party is now controlled by people who looked at Boris Johnson and decided five years of that was preferable to a Corbyn led Labour government.It's not a question of whether it's worth being a member, it's whether there is any point in voting for them.
Well. On current numbers Labour would need a swing harder than they got in the 1997 landslide, so chances are you're getting that next time anyway.Totally agree, but there again is it preferable to another few years of a batshit tory government?
Totally agree, but there again is it preferable to another few years of a batshit tory government?
Not when The North secedes.Yep, you too.
That is how the right get away with it and keep control of the party.
They are happy enough to abstain or vote for someone else when the left are in ascendancy, because it's not too much of a concern for them if the Tories win, but it's not so easy for the left.
But there comes a point when it's just not worth it.
Not when The North secedes.
Up to you innit. But bear in mind that the party is now controlled by people who looked at Boris Johnson and decided five years of that was preferable to a Corbyn led Labour government.