View attachment 236514
This is a rather interesting section of the EHRC report, given what Corbyn appears to have been suspended for.
Really? What do you think would have happened without Starmer's decisive action?If he’d just accepted the report it would be fine but going on about political motivations gave starmer no choice.
Really? What do you think would have happened without Starmer's decisive action?
Starmer wasn't obliged to say anything more today than that he and his party take the report very seriously and will be acting on its recommendations, stressing that there is no place for anti-Semitism in the labour party. Just that, nothing more. He appears to have panicked.Really? What do you think would have happened without Starmer's decisive action?
It is the most eye poppingly DUMB move, it really is. And that's from a man who already has a series of incredibly dumb decisions behind him.Starmer wasn't obliged to say anything more today than that he and his party take the report very seriously and will be acting on its recommendations, stressing that there is no place for anti-Semitism in the labour party. Just that, nothing more. He appears to have panicked.
Yep. No idea how good a lawyer he was, but he's a shit politician.It is the most eye poppingly DUMB move, it really is. And that's from a man who already has a series of incredibly dumb decisions behind him.
tbh the Labour right generally appear to be high on their own supply and believing their own publicity. The ones with a history of losing elections before JC but who absolutely believe in their own genius for being massive winners. Tey're really not as clever as they think they areYep. No idea how good a lawyer he was, but he's a shit politician.
tbh the Labour right generally appear to be high on their own supply and believing their own publicity. The ones with a history of losing elections before JC but who absolutely believe in their own genius for being massive winners. Tey're really not as clever as they think they areYep. No idea how good a lawyer he was, but he's a shit politician.
Meaningless. How many of the 70% of those 4,000 respondents who offered an opinion will have the first idea either what was in the report or what he said in response?
No, snap polls on breaking news are meaningless.Yes, only ‘experts’ who have the time to read long reports should be asked for their opinion.
No, snap polls on breaking news are meaningless.
I have no idea what that is. And it's not a different point at all.Thats a different point. Do you think ‘hot takes’ on Twitter are also meaningless?
He has not contradicted the report has he? There were political motivations involved on top of legitimate concerns. Wall to wall attacks and slander of him over years, come on now... Starmer is a fucking coward and would fold under an inch of the same pressure that was levelled at Corbyn personally rather than the 'party' and it's shortcomings.
That’s not the point though, the only thing to do today was draw a line under it and accept it with no buts or maybes.Exactly. He hasn't contradicted the report. The BBC initially reported in such a manner as to strongly suggest that he had. Starmer came out and spoke as if he had as well.
And is anybody on this thread going to claim that the anti-Semitism row wasn't exploited by poltical opponents of Corbyn within and outside labour and large parts of the press (Guardian, looking at you). It's laughable to claim that this part of what he said isn't true.
I have no idea what that is. And it's not a different point at all.
Why the fuck should he accept a flawed report which adds nothing new and demonstrates quite clearly how the investigating body is biased in the extreme and whose underlying assumptions are more than dubious?That’s not the point though, the only thing to do today was draw a line under it and accept it with no buts or maybes.
i hear that but you cant be suspended because of "optics"its about the “optics” today. Jeremy is terrible at politics.
What they are is instant reactions from various members of the commentariat on breaking news that others like/retweet and comment on.
I was just typing a reply, but yours is better.I think you've reached my peak couldn't give a shit with that.
Starmer was desperately trying to equivocate and do nothing about Corbyn today. Corbyn had to do one of two things today....maintain a dignified silence, or make a dignified statement thanking the commission for its efforts and saying he would study the report ....but no...he has to go on Facebook to say he’s the most wronged politician since Donald fucking Trump....wronged by the media and wronged by dark forces.
its about the “optics” today. Jeremy is terrible at politics. I had though he was quite a nice man with his heart in the right place....I’m not so sure...he’s almost as narcissistic as Johnson.
That’s not the point though, the only thing to do today was draw a line under it and accept it with no buts or maybes.
Of course he doesn't. But others should have today, even when they didn't actually contradict the findings of the very same report that they are being told they should have accepted, no ifs/buts or something.Do you accept absolute bullshit... no ifs not buts?
I’d win Islington North if you pinned a red rosette on me!So terrible at politics he continues to be reelected as a local MP for how long now?... and has personally weathered the most vitriolic, clearly personal, absurd and disturbing smear campaign i've seen in my lifetime...HE HAS BEEN WRONGED and has every right to speak out about that given the 'dignified silence' he maintained over the last years of daily vicious nonsense. He didn't contradict the report... sod you if you hate the idea of him so much you can't admit that.
I’d win Islington North if you pinned a red rosette on me!
He may well have been wronged, I’m not disputing that. Today was not the day to be on Facebook making ill-considered comments. Say something conciliatory or shut up, until next week at least.