Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

Meaningless. How many of the 70% of those 4,000 respondents who offered an opinion will have the first idea either what was in the report or what he said in response?

oh for gods sake you just don’t get how viscerally unattractive your politics are.

70% of leavers (more than Remainers incidentally) agreeing he should be suspended ia significant. I thought it was leavers who were the racists?
 
Starmer has dug himself a hole here. Corbyn let the socialism genie out of the bottle and it is not willingly going to go back in.

If anyone needs removing from the party by bad faith actors, they know Starmer is weak and will cave in and accept anything the party is accused of.
 
Given how this has been reported, I would wager that more than half of people interviewed will think that Corbyn broke the party procedures in order to stop cases of anti-Semitism from being heard.

Quite possibly. They probably had made their mind up about Corbyn prior to reading anything today
 
oh for gods sake you just don’t get how viscerally unattractive your politics are.

70% of leavers (more than Remainers incidentally) agreeing he should be suspended ia significant. I thought it was leavers who were the racists?
This report was released this morning. The first BBC report on it, which I reproduced on the other thread in full, gave the distinct impression that the report had found Corbyn guilty of breaking party rules in order to stymie anti-semitism moves against members. You now produce a snap poll in which more than 70% of respondents offer an opinion. How many of those 70% will have the first idea what the actual issues are about something that only broke in the news this morning, and about which the first reports on the BBC website were disgracefully misleading?
 
This report was released this morning. The first BBC report on it, which I reproduced on the other thread in full, gave the distinct impression that the report had found Corbyn guilty of breaking party rules in order to stymie anti-semitism moves against members. You now produce a snap poll in which more than 70% of respondents offer an opinion. How many of those 70% will have the first idea what the actual issues are about something that only broke in the news this morning, and about which the first reports on the BBC website were disgracefully misleading?

No you’re right. Those with less education and critical faculty than you have an issue with Corbyn because of the media told them to.
 
No you’re right. Those with less education and critical faculty than you have an issue with Corbyn because of the media told them to.
Have a little think. Do you think anything like 70% of the population will have an informed opinion about this piece of breaking news? Of course not. I wouldn't if I hadn't been skiving from work a bit this morning.

Also, does it matter that the BBC misreports breaking news like this? Yes, I think it rather does.
 
I wonder if they do secret nonsense polling just to test their methodologies.

"Jacob Rees-Mogg has had his sandwiches confiscated by a National Express employee in the course of a journey from Chester to Barnsley. In your opinion..."
 
Maybe he could have described the report as hysterically overstated? Histrionic?

Lacking the British stiff upper lip
 
If he’d just accepted the report it would be fine but going on about political motivations gave starmer no choice.

He has not contradicted the report has he? There were political motivations involved on top of legitimate concerns. Wall to wall attacks and slander of him over years, come on now... Starmer is a fucking coward and would fold under an inch of the same pressure that was levelled at Corbyn personally rather than the 'party' and it's shortcomings.
 
The Campaign Against Antisemitism has predictably issued Starmer with a list of people they want expelling.

Dianne Abbott,
Rebecca Long-Bailey,
Tahir Ali,
Mike Amesbury,
Apsana Begum,
Richard Burgon,
Barry Gardiner,
Kate Hollern,
Afzal Khan,
Angela Rayner,
Steve Reed,
Lloyd Russell-Moyle, B
Barry Sheerman,
Zarah Sultana
& others.
 
He has not contradicted the report has he? There were political motivations involved on top of legitimate concerns. Wall to wall attacks and slander of him over years, come on now... Starmer is a fucking coward and would fold under a inch of the same pressure that was levelled at Corbyn personally rather than the 'party' and it's shortcomings.
Exactly. He hasn't contradicted the report. The BBC initially reported in such a manner as to strongly suggest that he had. Starmer came out and spoke as if he had as well.

And is anybody on this thread going to claim that the anti-Semitism row wasn't exploited by poltical opponents of Corbyn within and outside labour and large parts of the press (Guardian, looking at you). It's laughable to claim that this part of what he said isn't true.
 
The Campaign Against Antisemitism has predictably issued Starmer with a list of people they want expelling.

Dianne Abbott,
Rebecca Long-Bailey,
Tahir Ali,
Mike Amesbury,
Apsana Begum,
Richard Burgon,
Barry Gardiner,
Kate Hollern,
Afzal Khan,
Angela Rayner,
Steve Reed,
Lloyd Russell-Moyle, B
Barry Sheerman,
Zarah Sultana
& others.

As demanded by the board of deputies no doubt. 👍
 
Back
Top Bottom