They don't have the numbers. So it makes them look weak, her look stronger, & adds another day of pointless procedural braying to wind everybody up even further.
lolI think a pivot to Lammy will be on the cards.
Traction in the house if neither here nor there - it's traction outside, in winnable and defensible seats. The house is irrelevant here.Yep, could do real damage to project Corbyn imo (sadly).
If he can't get traction in the house now, when can he? Do labour people, beyond the nutters, want to wait this parliament out with him as such an ineffective parliamentary leader? I think a pivot to Lammy will be on the cards.
Would be entertaining having him face humphries in the morning after his performance on celebrity mastermind though.This happens every time some cunt puts in a vaguely spirited performance in parliament doesn't it? Suddenly they're the next leader. until everyone remembers they're fucking shit.
This happens every time some cunt puts in a vaguely spirited performance in parliament doesn't it? Suddenly they're the next leader. until everyone remembers they're fucking shit.
I think that's right and not doing it would inevitably pose questions about Corbyn bottling it or similar. But Labour's bigger passivity over the last 2 years has not been taking any of this out on the road, whether it be big meetings like Corbyn had when elected or, better, in communities. That's not to suggest there was an easy sell for Labour, the Party was split and it's voters are split. But they should have been doing that regardless of Brexit. The whole Brexit vote was about people feeling abandoned/ignored by politicians, capital, globalisation. What better way to combat that than to engage? I'm not part of Lab or the Corbyn thing, but that should have been their logic. Instead, they've wanted to play it as a game of parliamentary ambushes, media briefings and the rest. Again showing that Labour - even Corbyn Labour - are part of the problem.As I understand it, this VoNC is a must. The govt has just suffered a massive loss in a parliamentary vote, it would actually be weird if the opposition didn't table one. Doesn't mean they expect to win, it's just what you do at this stage in proceedings. They may keep doing it, and it's certainly their prerogative (yeah, word of the day), every time a vote is lost over the next few weeks. Eventually one may even pass, who knows?
Panto season. Rah
was talking to a labour party person last week who said corbyn and McD have been up and down the country recently, it just doesn't get reportedI think that's right and not doing it would inevitably pose questions about Corbyn bottling it or similar. But Labour's bigger passivity over the last 2 years has not been taking any of this out on the road, whether it be big meetings like Corbyn had when elected or, better, in communities. That's not to suggest there was an easy sell for Labour, the Party was split and it's voters are split. But they should have been doing that regardless of Brexit. The whole Brexit vote was about people feeling abandoned/ignored by politicians, capital, globalisation. What better way to combat that than to engage? I'm not part of Lab or the Corbyn thing, but that should have been their logic. Instead, they've wanted to play it as a game of parliamentary ambushes, media briefings and the rest. Again showing that Labour - even Corbyn Labour - are part of the problem.
blimey someone interested in that image being true.was talking to a labour party person last week who said corbyn and McD have been up and down the country recently, it just doesn't get reported
Ken Clarke voted for the deal so it would be an odd moveKen Clarke and a small smattering of others might.
My couple of Labour friends have largely dropped out of Party activity since the election, drifting towards the centre and being consumed by people's vote shit.
In a seat that Labour win specularly with one of the biggest swings in the election we've had one, just one, bland and vague Party newsletter through the door.
They've not bothered to build a thing on the surge of interest and support they got round here. Nothing.
Meanwhile, as they run the Council, they've carried on cutting and gentrifying and the like.
Fucking idiots.
Labour in my area have continued to canvass nearly every weekend since the GE largely because they gained the seat from the torys and know it's vulnerable. They have concentrated on the most vulnerable wards. Perhaps your ward is less vulnerable?
I know from my area of the midlands Corbyn has done at least half a dozen weekend meetings in cities and small towns, sometimes two a day. If that's typical he will have covered most of the country in 2018. It certainly gets reported in the local press [there is so little local news these days] and attended by large enthusiastic audiences.was talking to a labour party person last week who said corbyn and McD have been up and down the country recently, it just doesn't get reported
not sure how to double check that
Really (on the first underlined bit)? I'm interested, what kind of numbers and have these been brexit only meetings?I know from my area of the midlands Corbyn has done at least half a dozen weekend meetings in cities and small towns, sometimes two a day. If that's typical he will have covered most of the country in 2018. It certainly gets reported in the local press [there is so little local news these days] and attended by large enthusiastic audiences.
The problem, as always with Labour, is there's nothing to do other than elections so all that enthusiasm drifts away.
And yes I know there's plenty to do, but being reluctant to speak ill of the dead I won't bore you with my accounts of ward meetings.
, it's more that Labour has a mindset that can't conceive of doing other things, organising other things, being something else.
In the hundreds, 200+ in my town which happens to be Tory held at every level. No, they weren't Brexit meetings they were about what a Labour govt would mean for working people. Brexit was covered, but not as "the most important issue in the UK today."Really (on the first underlined bit)? I'm interested, what kind of numbers and have these been brexit only meetings?
But the second underlined bit is really the problem (as you imply). It's not even that the work isn't being done, it's more that Labour has a mindset that can't conceive of doing other things, organising other things, being something else.
Cheers.In the hundreds, 200+ in my town which happens to be Tory held at every level. No, they weren't Brexit meetings they were about what a Labour govt would mean for working people. Brexit was covered, but not as "the most important issue in the UK today."
As to activity, even the local TUSC group with barely ten members does more in the town than my ward with over 70 members.
They're not horrible people, some are school governors, charity volunteers, or active in unions and local campaigns, but all as individuals - none of this is linked to the party, let alone discussed or decided on in meetings.
Many Labour Party members are involved in other groups and campaigns away from the party, and have interests and involvement in other stuff eg Palestinian campaigns, local friends groups, union activities, anti racist work, community groups etc. It’s not just about knocking on doors to canvass voters. I was on the last anti tommy Robinson march, and there were lots of other labour members there as wellI know from my area of the midlands Corbyn has done at least half a dozen weekend meetings in cities and small towns, sometimes two a day. If that's typical he will have covered most of the country in 2018. It certainly gets reported in the local press [there is so little local news these days] and attended by large enthusiastic audiences.
The problem, as always with Labour, is there's nothing to do other than elections so all that enthusiasm drifts away.
And yes I know there's plenty to do, but being reluctant to speak ill of the dead I won't bore you with my accounts of ward meetings.
The whole Brexit vote was about people feeling abandoned/ignored by politicians, capital, globalisation.