I think it is good to recognise that there is an issue in the party; it is better than pretending it doesn't exist.Is anyone concerned that rather than deal with his own failing on this one he’s simply reignited the issue for the whole party?
I think it is good to recognise that there is an issue in the party; it is better than pretending it doesn't exist.Is anyone concerned that rather than deal with his own failing on this one he’s simply reignited the issue for the whole party?
He isn't reigniting it - it is the issue. While plenty of people think he's a dyed in the wool antisemite himself, for most the problem is that he ignores, looks the other way or doesn't notice antisemitism. He can't answer the first lot except by resigning. The second, he can work to address - which is what he's attempting with that statement.Is anyone concerned that rather than deal with his own failing on this one he’s simply reignited the issue for the whole party?
Yes there is, but at the same time - so what? Would people fail to call out clear anti-semitism and repeatedly being involved with dodgy anti-semites with any other person because it might damage them electorally or reputation wise ? Not for a second - or at least not without becoming complicit in that anti-semitism themselves. And of course, that's exactly what's happened with the by now standard response of oh it's just an attack on Corbyn - well of course it is - and leaving the underlying issue alone. Until the next one, then the next one. Which isn't actually helping Corbyn or the labour left in any real sense anyway - not when it's them themselves leaving hostages to fortune dotted all over the place.Taking it as read that Corbyn was a bit of a chump in his comments.
Clearly there’s a major PR push on this 2012 issue right now.
The It's just another attack on Corbyn crew's reaction is the response those coordinating the attack were actually looking for.And of course, that's exactly what's happened with the by now standard response of oh it's just an attack on Corbyn
He isn't reigniting it - it is the issue. While plenty of people think he's a dyed in the wool antisemite himself, for most the problem is that he ignores, looks the other way or doesn't notice antisemitism. He can't answer the first lot except by resigning. The second, he can work to address - which is what he's attempting with that statement.
I think it is good to recognise that there is an issue in the party; it is better than pretending it doesn't exist.
Which one though bernie? And whose one? For the one that is basically an attack on Corbyn and carried out by people who will use any means to do so then these people are falling into the trap (see killer b's post above). And i also think we shouldn't discount that the people behind exposing this stuff may actually not like anti-semitism - so two birds one stone. For the PR battle that Corbyn and labour have with the wider public - one that clearly reviles anti-semitism but votes on other issues - to establish themselves as enduringly credible defenders of their interests then they need to sort their house out and do it publicly seriously and in a convincing manner. There are signs the leadership may have started to get that in some small way - some of the newer hardcore corbyn types, the ones more visible on social media so likely to do something damaging- not by a long chalk. Which is why this needs to be faced head on and now.Sure, but the PR issue is also an important one.
is it Jewish bankers? Or just bankers, some of whom are jewish?
He's one of the anarchists-for-labour crowd - exactly the sort i meant.and here!
It would (maybe) be reasonable if it was a one off, rather than the latest in a series of occasions where corbo has not noticed some blatant antisemitism under his nose.
I understand how it happens: he's been immersed in the Palestine liberation movement for decades, holding together a very disparate group of political movements - over the years he's made the choice to look the other way for the sake of political expediency and getting stuff done - at first no doubt with only minor infractions, but after 20 years of ignoring gradually worse and worse things, here he is not noticing The hook-nosed Jews counting their money on a mural one step down from the blood libel.
How he even find himself there, posting on the page of a mad racist artist? I'm willing to bet it's because his colleague in stop the war - the mad racist journalist Yvonne Ridley - posted an anti-Semitic comment on it so it popped up in his news feed. And he doesn't notice the racism from Yvonne anymore because he's been looking the other way so long, or the racism coded into the painting, so he posts some worthy bollocks about censorship and goes back to the allotment.
This is the generous reading of it, of course. It could just be that he doesn't notice the racists because he's a racist too.
And let's be honest - there are not just members saying oh it's just another attack, there are members defending the anti-semitic mural - arguing that it's not, it is in fact an accurate representation of both history and the current world. And again, these are the ones highly likely to be posting this on social media.
I've seen loads - i'm not even on facebook and i've seen loads on there via people showing me it in varying stages of disbelief/anger/laughter/told you so ness.I haven't seen a single defence of the mural, anywhere on soc media - I've seen seen likes of Richard Seymour pulling the artist and his conspira-bollocks to pieces - no defence of the piece
I've seen loads.
I think it is a more tricky and subtle issue to fix than your depiction suggests; it probably requires constant vigilance and openness to criticism to eventually evolve away from.The Party commissioned a report to do that and was in the process of moving on. I thought it had recognised the problem some while ago and had the measure of its size. It should have now been at the stage of having built bridges and inspiring confidence.
Surely the point is that its the de facto informal coalition corbyn is now in with the people who aren't sensible and have only half a brain - the mural painter, the various holocaust deniers and anti-semites he's been seen associating with - that is going to do the damage. Of course it's not going to be the sensible non racist ones.sorry, should have added ' from anyone sensible / with half a brain' etc
I think many were before this resurfaced - under the rubric of oh it's just anti-corbyn attack stuff. Actually seeing this piece of shit mural seems to have woken some people up. Brilliantly enough.plenty of apparently sensible non-racist ones sucked into excusing that shite too, mind.
That is 100% true for meI think many were before this resurfaced - under the rubric of oh it's just anti-corbyn attack stuff. Actually seeing this piece of shit mural seems to have woken some people up. Brilliantly enough.
yeah, fair point.I think many were before this resurfaced - under the rubric of oh it's just anti-corbyn attack stuff. Actually seeing this piece of shit mural seems to have woken some people up. Brilliantly enough.
Surely the point is that its the de facto informal coalition corbyn is now in with the people who aren't sensible and have only half a brain - the mural painter, the various holocaust deniers and anti-semites he's been seen associating with - that is going to do the damage. Of course it's not going to be the sensible non racist ones.
Incidentally, i read a piece in the new issue of Dissent the other day that i mean to pass onto you. It's a generally risible piece but one that introduces an interesting idea - what we are seeing is not the rise of conspiracy theories but conspiracism: "Conspiracism is not new, of course, but the conspiracism we see today does introduce something new—conspiracy without the theory." I think the article misses the target of this in its rush to defend expert and governmental legitimacy but think the idea can be prised away from that. A manner of viewing the world, a total perspective but one not based on specifics, no specific theories but "epistemic polarization".I can imagine the party leadership putting its house in order with respect to anti-semitism, but I’m struggling to imagine eradicating it at the rank and file level while our culture sustains a massive conspiraloon milieu which is a significant platoform for political propaganda. Which is kind of why I keep wanting to talk about that bit.
yvonne ridley, late of military intelligencePresumably that's ex RESPECT bigwig Yvonne Ridley being openly anti-semitic there as well isn't it?