Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Don't post when pissed mikey mikeyOh fkn hilarious Dear.
Don't post when pissed mikey mikeyOh fkn hilarious Dear.
treelover how was cl a key player? Could it be you're talking shit?This would be Chris Leslie who at the genesis of new Labour, say 1994, was a callow 22 year auld. Just when did he weasel his way into becoming a key player?
If only to push the DM into more 'Red Ed's Red Dead Dad' headlines.Not a pitbull either, but Milliband could come back I reckon.
Wasn't overly critical of Corbyn. Not hated/quite likeable. Wouldn't be controversial.
He's got the twitter bantz nailed these days as wellNot a pitbull either, but Milliband could come back I reckon.
Wasn't overly critical of Corbyn. Not hated/quite likeable. Wouldn't be controversial.
Not a pitbull either, but Milliband could come back I reckon.
Wasn't overly critical of Corbyn. Not hated/quite likeable. Wouldn't be controversial.
Possibly not as important as it once was, but could a Milliband return play into that 'Red fear'? Maybe just presents Labour's enemies with too easy a narrative to spin?If only to push the DM into more 'Red Ed's Red Dead Dad' headlines.
Not an issue. Milliband is basically Thatcher compared to Corbyn. He's a 'moderating' force, if anything.Possibly not as important as it once was, but could a Milliband return play into that 'Red fear'? Maybe just presents Labour's enemies with too easy a narrative to spin?
Honestly don't know, maybe it's not really an issue.
His appointment should be announced at a breakfast meeting with bacon sarnies all round, holding a copy of Parliamentary Socialism - 'There you go DM, make the fuck what you can out of that, you shower of fash supporting cunts'.Possibly not as important as it once was, but could a Milliband return play into that 'Red fear'? Maybe just presents Labour's enemies with too easy a narrative to spin?
Honestly don't know, maybe it's not really an issue.
I think you're right, but maybe if not attack dogs then... defence dogs? They need to have a few people who can give as good as they get, otherwise you get drowned out in every debate/story.I think the whole point of Corbyn's style of politics is to get away from attack dog, public school bully type of politics.
But I agree that if he tweaks his cabinet, Gardner and Miliband would be good people to include.
Yeah, but that's politics - he needs both. Himself as a kind of President of the party, campaigning and a bit of the old leading, with others doing some of the heavy lifting. Not necessarily full on pit bull, but humour, some good one liners. Snidey with a smile.I think the whole point of Corbyn's style of politics is to get away from attack dog, public school bully type of politics.
But I agree that if he tweaks his cabinet, Gardner and Miliband would be good people to include.
treelover how was cl a key player? Could it be you're talking shit?
how strange his name never cropped up in any of the papers in connection with welfare reform that year.Do one, it was 2005 when N/L began the welfare reform agenda in earnest, Leslie was a Christian Socialist who were very influential in the reforms.
Yeah, they need to be firmer in defending their record. E.g. one of the reasons Labour lost in 2015 was their failure to defend their economic record. They should have been much more forthright in saying that it was a global financial crisis, Brown did well to keep us out of the euro,etc.I think you're right, but maybe if not attack dogs then... defence dogs? They need to have a few people who can give as good as they get, otherwise you get drowned out in every debate/story.
she's in the Lords, so it doesn't really matter.What's Shami like in parliament? She always seems to do pretty well on the politics programmes.
Oh, yeah... I guess that might be a factorshe's in the Lords, so it doesn't really matter.
shapps and gardiner on the daily bollotix. Shapps is a fucking bellend.
If he can carry on in the same vein as the Marr Show performance he'll pick up a lot more wavering voters.Not rising to the bait and avoid the descent into Flashman style politics has done Corbyn's Labour a lot of good, I think. Maybe ordinary people identify with them more than they do with those who have been through the Oxford / Cambridge Union machine.
I'm not convinced the Labour right actually care that much about the policies, as long as they're electable ones. They'll happily go with a more left-wing agenda if it works for their career agendas. Opportunists.Unifying the Labour party... What does this mean?
It's one thing for the Labour right to he happy about the result and for Corbyn to keep on eating into Mays lead, but surely the manifesto is kryptonite to many of them. I can't see how that can ever he reconciled... ???