Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

As of...I honestly think I'd be prepared to shell out the £3 for the giggles...but do you have to furnish loads of personal details?
Like what?

I'm not a member of any other party. I've never said anything against the Labour Party on Facebook (I'm not on Facebook). They can search all they like for me on Twitter.

The only thing that might trip me up is whether I opted out of my union's political fund. Because I'm not paying for full party membership.
 
Like what?

I'm not a member of any other party. I've never said anything against the Labour Party on Facebook (I'm not on Facebook). They can search all they like for me on Twitter.

The only thing that might trip me up is whether I opted out of my union's political fund. Because I'm not paying for full party membership.
Dunno really, I suppose one of the previous 3 quidders might be able to say how much personal info you have to divulge.
 
Can't help you. I do know a 3 quider but she's left for the day. I became an affiliate member by accident.
 
Well, technically, I've never explicitly ruled out letting the dog lick me knackers and putting a video of it on youtube. Doesn't mean any other cunt wants to see it happen.
So, vis-a-vis the whole canine testicular tongue massage - that's not a definite no, then..?
 
I get a fucking load of LP emails currently, and I've never joined, taken part in leader elections or even voted for the buggers
Where I used to work, in local government, we got lots of masonic spam which began before I started there. This was especially strange as all my colleagues were women and therefore not eligible to join. :confused:
 
To be honest, if there's going to be a purge after this, it will only happen if the corbynites can do it on facebook. Anything else seems beyond them.
 
BBC News had Alastair Campbell and now David Blunkett on. Blunkett saying Momentum should go off and form their own party
 
If the election hasn't been called yet, I'm also presuming that they actually can be deselected. The Independent seems to be hinting that: Majority of new Labour members support deselecting MPs who undermine Jeremy Corbyn. Now that really could bring about change.

I might sign up too if somebody can point to a useful set that can be elected instead. The question in my mind is where the labour members are going to rustle up an extra 172 candidates from in a hurry.
 
So, vis-a-vis the whole canine testicular tongue massage - that's not a definite no, then..?

What I've said is, look, you know, we need to do what's right in the circumstances of the time, but I can say clearly that under present conditions I can see no eventuality in which it would be advantageous for such things to be prioritised.

I think I've made my position perfectly clear.
 
I suppose the MPs dividing the party by calling for "strong opposition" are the ones who abstained on the welfare bill.

Aka cunts.

They could be challenging racism, working out how to protect jobs but nah...westminster politiking matters more, letting the tories off the hook and confirming suspicions of those who see the political class as aloof. Which is to say that those same MPs moaning about corbyn not doing enough for remain are a factor in people voting leave themselves.

Still, 80k plus expenses per year, they dont need to give 2 fucks what the proles think.
 
Back
Top Bottom