mikey mikey
Active Member
Well here is Eva Bartlet, whom some posters will no doubt declare as...well whatever they can, I suppose.
Well here is eva bartlett is not a useful contribution.
Useful to whom? That is a very odd choice of adjective. Relevant, biased, untrue, unfounded are all terms I could understand, but useful?
“Emily Thornberry, on our behalf, during Foreign Office questions and on many other occasions, has made it absolutely clear that we do think there should be aid given to the people in Aleppo; we do think the bombing should end; we do think there should be a ceasefire; we do think there should be a political solution; we do think the war should end in Syria. We are absolutely supporting the people.”
Who is this post addressed to? The claims made in it - who are they to? if me, the last one is simply crazy,
Putin got trump elected by hacking the voting software and changing the votes not through the press.
Think wells, if you wish to go down this route. You know where it will end. Again.Crazy indeed.
On the contrary - i'm proud of posting it.You deny posting that now?
yeh that's what i've been thinking too but mikey mikey not wishing death by cancer left right and centre which was such a hallmark of Awesome Wells contributionsThis is working out well(s)
I would strongly urge fellow forum members to take the 18 minutes it takes to watch this courageous woman speak at the Canadian Press Conference at the UN.
Reading and comprehension not your strong suit then.I don't believe I have ever wished death on another poster here or anywhere else. I lost my dad to cancer over a year ago, so I would be especially rreluctant to do so. Anyway, thanks for the smear Pickman, I can see why you don't allow people to view your own full profile. I have no idea who Awesome Wells is.
I watched it - definitely not as bad as gnawing off a limb.I would rather gnaw my own leg off.
Reading and comprehension not your strong suit then.
What do you think 'bombing syria' is - you're parroting propaganda put out by people who are bombing syria - to the tune of near half million dead and millions of refugees.What has Thomas Mair got to do with not wishing to bomb Syria?
Jo Cox has been attacked as being an ISIS/AQ supporter for offering support to the white helmets - the people attacking her are the people you're swimming in the sewer with and using as support here.What has Thomas Mair got to do with not wishing to bomb Syria?
Don't do this wells. Don't. It won't end well.Are you able to provide direct evidence that Thomas Mair's motive for the murder of Jo Cox was her position on the UK policy regarding military intervention on Syria?
Or are you cynically using her death at the hands of a rightwing extremist in order to support your hawkish foreign policy position.
Let's not forget that you claimed on this thread that "Putin got trump elected by hacking the voting software and changing the votes".