Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
Shows up for me. I think sometimes you just have to wait a bit for it to load.View attachment 96380
please use the snipping tool or otherwise get a screengrab
Shows up for me. I think sometimes you just have to wait a bit for it to load.View attachment 96380
please use the snipping tool or otherwise get a screengrab
Emedded tweets don't show up in Tapatalk, it says 'unsupported media' so I now often only embed tweets if they have a vid in them.Shows up for me. I think sometimes you just have to wait a bit for it to load.
Serves you right for using tapatalk! it's a useless app.Emedded tweets don't show up in Tapatalk, it says 'unsupported media' so I now often only embed tweets if they have a vid in them.
Serves you right for using tapatalk! it's a useless app.
I CBA snipping it so here's a link:
ah, bollocks:
It's a tweet from Progress:
.@SKinnock We must move away from multiculturalism and towards assimilation. We must stand for one group: the British people. #progpolitics
Serves you right for using tapatalk! it's a useless app.
I CBA snipping it so here's a link:
ah, bollocks:
It's a tweet from Progress:
.@SKinnock We must move away from multiculturalism and towards assimilation. We must stand for one group: the British people. #progpolitics
I've never had any trouble with chrome on my phone.lol yeah it's not the best app I've ever come across but better than using a browser on a phone imo. Screenies don't take long to do really.
It is at least paraphrasing Kinnock, I am pretty sure - it's part of a series of tweets with what seem like comments by speakers at some event they were having.Ah, I assumed it was quoting Kinnock for some reason.
It is at least paraphrasing Kinnock, I am pretty sure - it's part of a series of tweets with what seem like comments by speakers at some event they were having.
If anyone fancies listening to an hour and a half of it to see what he said exactly... (spoiler: I don't)
Wasn't sure really where to put this and it doesn't deserve its own thread, so I will write it here in the absence of somewhere better
I was listening to some of this lecture The New Minority: white working class politics in an era of immigration and inequality - Public lectures and events
I do not recommend it, it is very patronising and anthropological and has a very heavy emphasis on the sort of weird anthropological Ace Ventura: Pet Detective take that some academics seem to have decided on now for the British (and American) working-class but what I did find interesting was Stephen Kinnock's participation in it.
The stuff he says is really interesting, it shows how radically political discourse, if (as with May etc) nothing else, has changed. He talks very critically about neoliberalism which he identifies by that name but only in very generalised terms, and he fails to make any actual specific critiques of it beyond immigration. Is this what the right of the Labour Party are going to do now?
Yeh. well, after waiting four or five minutes I tend to get a mite pissed off when it has yet to appearShows up for me. I think sometimes you just have to wait a bit for it to load.
We know the gap between rich and poor is widening. We know living standards are stagnating or falling and insecurity is growing.
We know that many people feel left behind by the forces unleashed by globalisation – powerless in the face of deregulated corporate power.
Often the populist right do identify the right problems but their solutions are the toxic dead ends of the past, seeking to divert it with rhetoric designed to divide and blame.
They are political parasites, feeding on people’s concerns and worsening conditions, blaming the most vulnerable for society’s ills instead of offering a way to take back real control of our lives from powerful elites who serve their own interests.
But unless progressive parties and movements break with that failed economic and political establishment it is the siren voices of the populist far right that will fill the gap
They will have to somehow deal with Labour First and Progress. There is no way they will stop the infighting until a Progress leader is in charge of the Labour Party.
Meanwhile Corbyn's speech in Prague is hitting numerous nails on their head.
Corbyn: “Alarming acceleration” in the populist right across Europe and beyond | LabourList
They will have to somehow deal with Labour First and Progress. There is no way they will stop the infighting until a Progress leader is in charge of the Labour Party.
Meanwhile Corbyn's speech in Prague is hitting numerous nails on their head.
Corbyn: “Alarming acceleration” in the populist right across Europe and beyond | LabourList
Former Labour leadership candidate Owen Smith will seek to change legislation to allow Parliament the option of holding a second EU referendum.
The Pontypridd MP said the government should be able to ask people if they are certain they want to leave Europe.
As chief lobbyist for Pfizer, Smith actively pushed for privatisation of NHS services. This is not something Pfizer did very openly, and you have to search the evidence carefully. Footnotes often tell you what is really happening, as in this press release in which Owen Smith says of a Pfizer funded “focus group” study:
"We believe that choice is a good thing and that patients and healthcare professionals should be at the heart of developing the agenda."
You have to look at the footnotes to see what kind of choice Owen Smith is actually talking about. Note to Editors 3 includes
“The focus groups also explored areas of choice that do not yet exist in the UK – most specifically the use of direct payments and the ability to choose to go directly to a specialist without first having to see the GP.”
Well, at least it is clear – direct payments from the public to doctors replacing current NHS services. Smith was promoting straight privatisation. As Head of Policy and Government Relations for Pfizer, Owen Smith was also directly involved in Pfizer’s funding of Blairite right wing entryist group Progress. Pfizer gave Progress £53,000. Progress has actively pursued the agenda of PFI and privatisation of NHS services.
Q: You says you would allow minimum hours contracts, not zero-hours contracts. What would the minimum be?
Smith says we should reverse the status quo. A contract should offer a minimum number of hours.
Q: Could it be one hour?
It could, says Smith. But the important thing is that it is not zero.
“Like a lot of other members, I was disappointed that, as a member, I couldn’t take part. Why has it been changed this time? Obviously to get a different result.”
“I was so disappointed at the way the voting took place. It was the first time I had attended a meeting and I was shocked to learn the results of our vote had to then be fed into a secret ballot. What is there to be secret about?
"Everyone was open about their preferred choice and surely it would have been more honest if we could have seen exactly who the delegates were voting for.”