Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
This thread used to be fun.
This thread used to be fun.
Can Jezza really only fill his shadow cabinet by bringing in the recently ennobled?
tbh it's not like the plp is replete with high-powered and/or competent people.He's not exactly replete with high-powered allies, any solid names he can get I'd imagine. Same goes for promoting Abbott when Burnham made his exit, looks to me like it's about making sure the right's got as little influence in top spots as possible. Olive branches are one thing, but the 172 won't get anything vital.
tbh it's not like the plp is replete with high-powered and/or competent people.
tbh it's not like the plp is replete with high-powered and/or competent people.
tbh it's not like the plp is replete with high-powered and/or competent people.
So JC has given Abbot and Chakrabarti those jobs for no other reason than to rub other people's noses in it?
What you are suggesting would be the worst kind of tokenism on the part of JC. That he doesn't view these women as having anything to offer other than being women and being Black and Asian?
It's a big claim on your part and a fucking nasty one to boot.
Nope. They're just lashing out while they still can. He knows fuckin well how the MoS readers will react when Shami decides a Labour Government would prosecute the army en masse because of..guns....or excessive heteronormativity..or a squaddie looked at her funny, once.
So JC has given Abbot and Chakrabarti those jobs for no other reason than to rub other people's noses in it?
What you are suggesting would be the worst kind of tokenism on the part of JC. That he doesn't view these women as having anything to offer other than being women and being Black and Asian?
It's a big claim on your part and a fucking nasty one to boot.
Alternative is what? He thinks Abbott'll do a good job...and it's a sound electoral strategy? Nope. They're just lashing out while they still can. He knows fuckin well how the MoS readers will react when Shami decides a Labour Government would prosecute the army en masse because of..guns....or excessive heteronormativity..or a squaddie looked at her funny, once.
It's a big fuckin wind up...and it'll teach old labour its place and serve them right for being so hideously white.
You seen the papers this morning?...which took me by surprise, btw...CIF has gone all Essex man. Looks like whether or not my suggestion is a) right or b) fuckin offensive, the consequence of what he's done is the same.
Also, is my point offensive because I'm suggesting that party strategists preconsider the effect of race on an electorate or because I'm suggesting Corbyn's doing it? I doubt there'd be any criticism if I cited a few Tory or UKIP dog-whistle stunts from the past few years. Why is it fuckin offensive to suggest Corbyn might pull a reverse dog-whistle manoeuvre for his own devious reasons? And, again, Abbott is a liability and a very poor debater. He's doing nobody any favours with her.
Not impressed with your post at all. If it's a roundabout way of labelling me racist, incidentally, go fuck yourself.
The ex labour now a bit right wing w/c who I know in Essex slagging abbot for her private school hypocrisy not her race.. although it may be a hidden factor for some..they say the same with doreen Lawrence when not speaking out when a white lad gets stabbed...essex also voted pritti patel. Were warsi and javid seen as negative factors by tories when weighing up potential w/c votes..
Don't think ur post is racist at all..but what might Corbyn's devious reasons be?
Thornbury is a liability because of that wvm tweet..will resonate for many for a long time.
tell you what, why not log off and spend the rest of the afternoon reading about politics so when you return you can have an air of authority rather than a fart of failure about you.I think Corbyn's knows he has zero chance electorally.
I think he wants to achieve something with the short window of power he has, albeit as leader of a small and unpopular opposition.
He'll achieve little by acting as a conventional leader of opposition.
More chance to capitalise on the massive (and generally hostile) media scrutiny.
Best way to do so is to pull stunts like appointing Abbott and harnessing the whirlwind to slide through anything he can get away with even if he only gets to highlight and firmly establish Tory abuses rather than reverse them.
He at least gets to do so under full spotlight As long as there's controversy.
OK. Any suggestions for the reading matter? 'Observer Book of Opposition Tactics'?tell you what, why not log off and spend the rest of the afternoon reading about politics so when you return you can have an air of authority rather than a fart of failure about you.
ah, george sampson's 1963 book.OK. Any suggestions for the reading matter? 'Observer Book of Opposition Tactics'?
tell you what, why not log off and spend the rest of the afternoon reading about politics so when you return you can have an air of authority rather than a fart of failure about you.
And they're polling at what? 23%....think that covers unpopular, frankly.ah, george sampson's 1963 book.
perhaps you could simply start with wikipedia's article on the 2015 general election, and explore the history of the labour party perhaps through the same source. when you say things like corbyn is 'leader of a small and unpopular opposition' you don't cover yourself in glory.
a quick google reveals you're rather off the mark.And they're polling at what? 23%....think that covers unpopular, frankly.
Small? I even think Wiki could firmly establish that one.
Nah, not really seeing what you're getting at.
there are none so blind as those who will not seeNah, not really seeing what you're getting at.
a quick google reveals you're rather off the mark.
View attachment 93569
if you think corbyn's doing so badly why do you think the tories have suddenly started talking about an industrial strategy, ripping it off from er john mcdonnell?
yeh i thought you'd be shown wanting.Fuck off
does anyone outside the bubble give a flying one about the make up of the shadow cabinet?
yeh i thought you'd be shown wanting.
It's a big fuckin wind up...go fuck yourself.
a quick google reveals you're rather off the mark.
View attachment 93569
if you think corbyn's doing so badly why do you think the tories have suddenly started talking about an industrial strategy, ripping it off from er john mcdonnell?
i have at least produced a poll. while you have blustered away. fuck off yourself.Sorry. That was offensive. I should have replaced 'Fuck off..." with...
"Please don't think you're gonna score a quick point by quoting anything as wholly spurious as a poll by..."
it is unsurprising that they are not doing so well in the polls considering the behaviour of so many members of the parliamentary labour party.I believe Corbyn and team believe they can win, however, Labour currently have the second worst polling since William Hague was Tory leader.
I don't think he can win but it'll be very interesting to watch.