Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

I think the problem with the graph is that is far too small a sample to draw firm conclusions from. We can though expect leader approval statistics to correlate with electability, but Corbyn's approval stats can move, and freaky results are certainly possible (take Brexit for instance)
 
Lord Kinnock warns against Jeremy Corbyn re-election

Speaking to the BBC's Panorama programme, Lord Kinnock said: "Unless things change radically, and rapidly, it's very doubtful I'll see another Labour government in my lifetime."

Lord Kinnock, who led the fight against left-wing extremism in the 1980s, when Labour was paralysed by faction fighting, said: "Not just in my lifetime but stretching back to the 1930s, by any examination this is the greatest crisis that the Labour Party has faced."
:thumbs:
 
The problem with that graph is the same as the problem with this one:
View attachment 92678
I'm not sure that the Labour leaders graph does actually fall into the trap of 'correlation (between 2 different variable)not = causation' criticism. Although it is plotted on 2 axes, it's primarily a means of comparison of one data set, that of polling performance.
 
That's a fair point of course. But it does underline the dilemma for the part of the Labour party that doesn't just want to be elected whatever it takes: we need a viable, credible, electable opposition now at least as much as we ever have. But really turning the current LP into something worth electing could be the work of a couple of generations at least. I mean, it all sounds great when Corbyn talks about giving the power back to the members but grassroots-up politics will take a very long time to do properly. The problem is, they've got two essential jobs to do - real opposition, and totally overhauling the party - which it doesn't appear possible to do at the same time.
the way forward is clear comrade. Effective opposition will be built when the party membership elects the shadow SoS for Brexit and the PLP chooses the shadow minister for abattoirs.
 
I'm not sure that the Labour leaders graph does actually fall into the trap of 'correlation (between 2 different variable)not = causation' criticism. Although it is plotted on 2 axes, it's primarily a means of comparison of one data set, that of polling performance.
A better comparison would have been one for which the variables are genuinely related but not through direct causation.

Like the fact that in children, shoe size is correlated with IQ. Because older children have bigger feet and higher IQ than younger children. The correlation doesn't tell you nothing, exactly, but it is obfuscating the true relationships of variables.
 
A better comparison would have been one for which the variables are genuinely related but not through direct causation.

Like the fact that in children, shoe size is correlated with IQ. Because older children have bigger feet and higher IQ than younger children. The correlation doesn't tell you nothing, exactly, but it is obfuscating the true relationships of variables.
Perhaps reading the graph without the grey "winning zone" might be better.
 
Watch this space, I'm not alone

Well good luck to you. But that response doesn't even attempt to address the point I made, so it's very far from convincing/reassuring. I don't yearn for the mainstream left to spend 20 years in the wilderness reassessing itself: I just think it may not have much choice if it really wants to be more than the slightly less nasty party.
 
A better comparison would have been one for which the variables are genuinely related but not through direct causation.

Like the fact that in children, shoe size is correlated with IQ. Because older children have bigger feet and higher IQ than younger children. The correlation doesn't tell you nothing, exactly, but it is obfuscating the true relationships of variables.
That's boosted my self esteem as I'm size 11.5
 
I have received a text from a trustworthy colleague saying.
Beware of phone calls purportedly from the Corbyn election team, but really from team Smith, trying to fool folk into saying something anti labour so they can be reported and their vote removed.
Anyone else heard this or is it just more twaddle?
 
I have received a text from a trustworthy colleague saying.
Beware of phone calls purportedly from the Corbyn election team, but really from team Smith, trying to fool folk into saying something anti labour so they can be reported and their vote removed.
Anyone else heard this or is it just more twaddle?
I wouldn't be surprised at all if they were recording calls and reporting any members they found to be corbyn supporters who said anything remotely out of line.

I doubt they're specifically stating they're calling from the corbyn campaign.
 
Ran into someone who I had last really spoken to in about 2013, one of the last conversations we had was about the Labour Party. He justified his membership in Labour to me on the basis that he was just waiting for a socialist leader, and then once one came it would be all be worth it. I asked him who he was voting for in the leadership election this time round... it was, 'agonisingly', Owen Smith. Can't make it up, can you?
 
Ran into someone who I had last really spoken to in about 2013, one of the last conversations we had was about the Labour Party. He justified his membership in Labour to me on the basis that he was just waiting for a socialist leader, and then once one came it would be all be worth it. I asked him who he was voting for in the leadership election this time round... it was, 'agonisingly', Owen Smith. Can't make it up, can you?
:facepalm:
 
Back
Top Bottom