brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
Incidentally, Kid_Eternity was there anything, other than the typo, that you disagreed with in the Corbyn leaflet?
It's a typo.
But those policies; you don't object to those, do you?No, it’s a mistake. Nobody transposed letters or even misplaced an apostrophe, they said that the UK was the sixth biggest country in the world. And nobody who checked the leaflet noticed.
Corbyn’s team seem to be low wattage.
Also, they claim that they saved the Whittington hospital. I am pretty sure no one was planning to close it down.
How do you solve the problem of people - particularly young people - not being able to afford somewhere to live while many landlords and land owning companies make a fortune?Not sure about rent controls at all.
How do you solve the problem of people - particularly young people - not being able to afford somewhere to live while many landlords and land owning companies make a fortune?
What do you think "peace around the world" means to Corbyn and his "useful idiot acolytes"?
So there's much that you do agree with in JC's campaigning, then? I presume you'd vote for him if you lived in the constituency?Not sure about rent controls at all. I don’t care who owns the Royal Mail. I object massively to “peace around the world” because I know perfectly well what Corbyn and his useful idiot acolytes mean by it. Everything else seems fine.
I also have a very dim view of the maternity unit at the Whittington, as they nearly killed our firstborn, but that’s by the by.
Haven't read it, please could you tell me what "Peace around the world" means to Corbyn and his "useful idiot acolytes"?
Like Corbyn suggests in that leaflet. Unfortunately that doesn't help reduce rents unless you build all over the green belt. And many places in Cornwall have loads of houses that aren't occupied for most of the year, so building more houses isn't the whole solution there either.Build more houses.
Like Corbyn suggests in that leaflet. Unfortunately that doesn't help reduce rents unless you build all over the green belt. And many places in Cornwall have loads of houses that aren't occupied for most of the year, so building more houses isn't the whole solution their either.
So why don't rent controls work?
Honestly, I wouldn't bother...it looks like some folk here really do support 'entrepreneur' candidates for neoliberal parties.Like Corbyn suggests in that leaflet. Unfortunately that doesn't help reduce rents unless you build all over the green belt. And many places in Cornwall have loads of houses that aren't occupied for most of the year, so building more houses isn't the whole solution there either.
So why don't rent controls work?
You’ll find it edifying. Anyway, I don’t believe you.
I genuinely haven't, it's got its own subforum which I forget to click through on.
I was just trying to work out if you were a "Corbyn and his useful idiot acolytes are in hock to Putin" kind of guy or a "Corbyn and his useful idiot acolytes want to reopen Auschwitz" kind of guy.
From the fact you've referred me to a Ukraine thread I'm guessing the first?
Not even suggesting building on brownfield sites and making better use of unoccupied buildings. Thank fuck you're not in charge of housebuilding.I’m okay with building on the green belt. About four more Milton Keyneses should do it. Two in Bucks, two in Essex. Maybe some in the North West? No idea what housing demand is like up there.
That's just nonsense, rents have been artificially inflated.But it still seems like a sticking plaster solution to undersupply.
Not even suggesting building on brownfield sites and making better use of unoccupied buildings. Thank fuck you're not in charge of housebuilding.
That's just nonsense, rents have been artificially inflated.
So you've got no actual reason as to why they don't work.
Try deliberately rather than artificially; from the initial Thatcher relaxation of the availability of credit onwards, the emphasis has been on creating demand for mortgaged homes. It's not a clever housing strategy if your primary interest is in providing affordable and appropriate properties.Artificially inflated? What’s going on beyond supply and demand?
Sky News has found more than 6,000 publicly-owned homes in England have been empty for over a year - yet 145,800 children are homeless and living in temporary accommodation.
The most recent government statistics, released in November 2023, showed there were 261,189 long-term empty properties in England. That figure represents a rise of 12,556 homes compared to 2022, up 5% annually and 16% since before the pandemic in 2019.
But yes, let's build over the green belt, reduce biodiversity displace the wildlife.
Build more houses.
What about building local authority, democratically accountable, statutory entitled homes, funded by cheap government borrowing, recouping their costs many times over during the life of the property? We place all our housing eggs in the mortgage basket and it's stupid (in many ways).Penalising second homes (and holiday lets) is a no-brainer. No arguments there.
So bringing rent controls back what is the problem for you?
What about building local authority, democratically accountable, statutory entitled homes, funded by cheap government borrowing, recouping their costs many times over during the life of the property? We place all our housing eggs in the mortgage basket and it's stupid (in many ways).
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
And...?Well, yeah, obviously. Lots of that will go up in Bucks and Essex.
The rest is silence. If we're lucky.And...?