Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is it too late?

Strange this article being considered "entertainment news" Quite frightening to me:

 
It was never going to be linear. And the longer we go without dramatically reducing human emissions, the more other emissions will grow
 
"the GRB that rocked the world last year"

Rocked the world? Slightly depleted the ozone layer for a few minutes, with no recorded effects on life.
 
Strange this article being considered "entertainment news" Quite frightening to me:

You'll not have to worry about it. The next one is 'expected' in 20 million years. :hmm:
 
You'll not have to worry about it. The next one is 'expected' in 20 million years. :hmm:
That reminds of that story related by, I think, Patrick Moore, in which he gives a lecture in which he states that Sun will come to the end of its life in about five billion years.

Afterwards, someone approaches him and says “the Sun will die in five million years?”

“No,” he replies. “Five BILLION”.

“Phew, that’s a relief” says the audience member.
 
“People took such awful chances with chemicals and their bodies because they wanted the quality of their lives to improve. They lived in ugly places where there were only ugly things to do. They didn’t own doodley-squat, so they couldn’t improve their surroundings. So they did their best to make their insides beautiful instead.” – Kurt Vonnegut, Breakfast of Champions
 
2024 could hit an average of 1.5C above pre-industrial temperatures which apparently would be the first time in human history. 2023 is looking to be 1.4C above.

Met Office graph showing global average surface temperature since the year 2000, with the estimate potential range for 2024 highlighted

 
COP28 summarised:
The text that was presented to delegates on Wednesday morning at Cop28 – and that was adopted a few minutes ago - enjoins countries for the first time to embark on a de facto phase out of fossil fuels. But it cannot require them to do so and it contains “a litany of loopholes”
 
I think it's progress of a sort. Perhaps if we had had the international commitment to transition away from fossil fuels in place last year it would have been slightly more difficult for the government to go ahead with the new oil and gas exploration - maybe that could just have tipped the balance of political argument. Maybe.

But when it comes down to it, we are hurtling towards 1.5 and 2 degrees and this dancing around the language of non-binding text is really neither here nor there. Best summation I've read of where we actually are post-COP, in terms of the physics and scale of the challenge, is this by Kevin Anderson: Quick response to the draft final text of COP28 - Climate Uncensored (and the linked article - How Alive is 1.5?)
 
I think it's progress of a sort. Perhaps if we had had the international commitment to transition away from fossil fuels in place last year it would have been slightly more difficult for the government to go ahead with the new oil and gas exploration - maybe that could just have tipped the balance of political argument. Maybe.
Could it tip Starmer and Labour into saying they'll take away the recently issued licences? I doubt it, but it'd be a welcome U-turn.
 
Back
Top Bottom