SaskiaJayne
Rural Guerrilla
It depends who you mean by “we”. It does appear the right wing brexiteers plans include allowing US medical insurers in to slowly privatise the NHS & one can be fairly sure the tax breaks would all be for the rich & the welfare state would continue to shrink.It all obviously depends a lot on how the Brexit negotiations go and what happens in domestic politics over the next five years. But, broadly, I would predict that one of the key effects of Brexit would be to increase the influence of capital over public policy relative to what it is now. How far that happens will be a factor of how much of a Brexit we get. But if, for example, we are in a situation where the country is hemorrhaging manufacturing jobs (I think this is likely with a hard Brexit), the government will be forced to make concessions to manufacturers in order to stem the bleed. Ditto for financial services. A government which tried to resist couldn't last. So, in a nightmare scenario, I don't think having a Labour government will help very much. If things are less drastic, having a Labour government might compensate for some of the negative effects (or it might not), but it won't do anything to prevent them, and there's no foreseeable way that we will be any better off under a Labour government post-Brexit than we would under a Labour government sans Brexit.
Conversely it would appear Labour are willing to build council houses & generally have policies generally more friendly to those on lower incomes. So if by “we” we mean those on lower incomes them whatever the given state of the economy then “we” will be better off with Labour.
This may relate to kabbes earlier point that growth in the economy does not benefit the poor if only the rich benefit from that growth.