butchersapron
Bring back hanging
The only two posters I've seen who think that someone putting you on ignore means that you can't see their posts are good mates sass and this dexter.um...I can still see your posts you moron
The only two posters I've seen who think that someone putting you on ignore means that you can't see their posts are good mates sass and this dexter.um...I can still see your posts you moron
It may be the intended meaning but technically the wording could be read as the other way around.He means that *he* has put *you* on ignore, you hunchbrain.
It may be the intended meaning but technically the wording could be read as the other way around.
It may be the intended meaning but technically the wording could be read as the other way around.
None of us is.Good thing none of us are composing a legal document, eh?
none of us need composeNone of us is.
Unless Lazy Llama has been up to some technical wizardry I'm unaware of, it's not actually possible to block specific posters from reading your comments, is it?It may be the intended meaning but technically the wording could be read as the other way around.
None of us is.
Can we have a bit fewer of this pedantic nit-picking, pleaseNone of us is.
“None” should be treated as if a contraction of “not one”."None of us is composing" doesn't sound right to me.
Never understood why it's such an honour to be put in charge of the bogs.
Top 10 grammar myths: none always takes a singular verb - Online Grammar“None” should be treated as if a contraction of “not one”.
(I mean, I don’t actually care. But since we were doing banter about language exactitude I thought it would be amusing to insist).
She'll do very nicely thanks - taking one for the team and then retiring on a mahoosive pension.Can someone put may out of her misery? I know life is pain but This is too much
Doesn't really work does it. A GE would only settle matters if the two main parties took opposing sides. As that isn't going to happen I think we need a referendum on Stay vs Mays Deal.
dextertcn is the auld moany of urbanWe've got a really special one here folks
Where are the numbers in parliament coming from for this?Ground being prepared for no Brexit imo.
Where are the numbers in parliament coming from for this?
this is the home of speculationUtter speculation in my part of course. But that's all anyone can offer right now, no?
It would need to be voted on, no? My understanding of the ECJ's ruling is that a unilateral revocation of A50 by the UK is allowed but only after the country's due democratic process has been followed, and that's been widely interpreted to mean a vote in parliament.I don't think that it will get voted on, so the numbers won't be an issue.
It would need to be voted on, no? My understanding of the ECJ's ruling is that a unilateral revocation of A50 by the UK is allowed but only after the country's due democratic process has been followed, and that's been widely interpreted to mean a vote in parliament.
Sure, I just wanted to see your workings-out.
Personally I think cancelling brexit altogether by the executive is one of the least likely possibilities, just because of what it will do to the conservative party.