Next Conservative Leader
Dominic Raab 9/2
Sajid Javid 11/2
Boris Johnson 6/1
Michael Gove 6/1
David Davis 6/1
Jeremy Hunt 7/1
Happy days
Politicians are quite silly people aren't they?
Fwiw, I still don't see Labour in power any time soon.
No, and would not like to see it under Corbyn. Under a more balanced Labour leader, then yes. Every party runs out of steam in government, and this lot have had their day.
I honestly think that if Labour had had a more moderate person in charge, they would have won the last one, they came very very close.
Next Conservative Leader
Dominic Raab 9/2
Sajid Javid 11/2
Boris Johnson 6/1
Michael Gove 6/1
David Davis 6/1
Jeremy Hunt 7/1
Happy days
No, and would not like to see it under Corbyn. Under a more balanced Labour leader, then yes. Every party runs out of steam in government, and this lot have had their day.
I honestly think that if Labour had had a more moderate person in charge, they would have won the last one, they came very very close.
God knows.If it comes down to a choice between 2nd ref and a crashing out though?
low end jobs that Brits don't want to do
You mean "right wing." Corbyn is a standard-model social democrat, there's nothing immoderate about him.
Also:
View attachment 152579
Hmm. I see no wheat. If ever there was a wheatfield repeat moment for May, it'd have to be finally being unshackled from the zombie government she's part of...Isn't she gonna be proper chuffed if she gets her P45 at this point? I bloody would be.
"Bye then..."
did you know that in 1945 the labour party didn't have a big section on 'how we're going to pay for this' in their manifesto?When people start talking about nationalising the railways etc, but with no concrete plans as to how to pay, other than more borrowing, it spooks voters.
I seem to remember the likes of the imf or similar giving a big thumbs up to peoples quantative easing. Generally well received spending plan by the establishmentWhen people start talking about nationalising the railways etc, but with no concrete plans as to how to pay, other than more borrowing, it spooks voters.
Corbyn should have romped home last time, but didn't.
You have your view, but I would say that the actuality is that it is not shared by everyone, not even all of those on the left of the political spectrum.
Merkel is a Social Democrat, Corbyn is not.
she will wake up and smell the remnants of the whaling industry at grytviken, there being no coffee to mask the scentHmm. I see no wheat. If ever there was a wheatfield repeat moment for May, it'd have to be finally being unshackled from the zombie government she's part of...
NHS work isn't "low-end jobs that Brits don't want to do", it's a spectrum of highly-skilled to precarious labour which has been routinely lacking in training and resources and has historically relied on brain-draining weaker nations to make up for it. Leaving Europe will impact on this strategy, but the whole situation has been shameful for decades.
Indeed, but not something that can be done on a never ending basis.I seem to remember the likes of the imf or similar giving a big thumbs up to peoples quantative easing. Generally well received spending plan by the establishment
When people start talking about nationalising the railways etc, but with no concrete plans as to how to pay, other than more borrowing, it spooks voters.
Corbyn should have romped home last time, but didn't.
You have your view, but I would say that the actuality is that it is not shared by everyone, not even all of those on the left of the political spectrum.
Merkel is a Social Democrat, Corbyn is not.
For someone who has 'followed politics for 50 years' you seem to have an issue with some pretty basic terms. Merkel is as much of a 'social democrat' as Ken Clarke is. Liberal toryism is not the same as social democracy.When people start talking about nationalising the railways etc, but with no concrete plans as to how to pay, other than more borrowing, it spooks voters.
Corbyn should have romped home last time, but didn't.
You have your view, but I would say that the actuality is that it is not shared by everyone, not even all of those on the left of the political spectrum.
Merkel is a Social Democrat, Corbyn is not.
corbyn's far to the right of auld 'red' jim callaghanWhen people start talking about nationalising the railways etc, but with no concrete plans as to how to pay, other than more borrowing, it spooks voters.
Corbyn should have romped home last time, but didn't.
You have your view, but I would say that the actuality is that it is not shared by everyone, not even all of those on the left of the political spectrum.
Merkel is a Social Democrat, Corbyn is not.
Been in a meeting for an hour, have I missed much?
did you know that in 1945 the labour party didn't have a big section on 'how we're going to pay for this' in their manifesto?
British Labour Party election manifesto, 1945 [Archive]
the point being, you didn't see people quibbling about oh noes how will they pay for nationalising the coal? and what's all this about the nhs? remind me pls, who won the 1945 election?Did you know that there was no option? The government commandeered the railways during the war, and so much damage was done to the permanent way that there was no money for repairs, prior to handing the track back to the owners.
It was not only railways nationalised, and the owners were paid out in British Transport Stock. I know this because my grandfather's haulage company was nationalised, and on his death, my mother and her sisters received the stock on his death. I can remember my mother getting the dividend. Don't know what the final outcome was, whether the dividend eventually redeemed the stock, or whether it was paid out. It certainly didn't filter down to me.
the doctors are no longer sure that theresa may can be fixed - humpty-dumpty being mentioned across the palace of westminsterIt’s all been fixed. Panic over.