Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Brexit actually going to happen?

Will we have a brexit?


  • Total voters
    362
the point being, you didn't see people quibbling about oh noes how will they pay for nationalising the coal? and what's all this about the nhs? remind me pls, who won the 1945 election?

Which party sent reps out to the disgruntled troops awaiting demob in Germany and Austria, promising that if they were elected the process would be accelerated? Answer, the same party that lost the next election, thereby proving that you can fool some of the people...
 
Which party sent reps out to the disgruntled troops awaiting demob in Germany and Austria, promising that if they were elected the process would be accelerated? Answer, the same party that lost the next election, thereby proving that you can fool some of the people...
let me give you a little lesson in counting

1: 1945
upload_2018-11-15_15-28-27.png
2: 1950
upload_2018-11-15_15-29-9.png
do you see how the labour party's vote did not decline, as you suggested, but rather went up by more than 1.2 million? perhaps you could also explain how a party with a majority of five seats lost the election
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-15_15-28-54.png
    upload_2018-11-15_15-28-54.png
    57.9 KB · Views: 3
Which party sent reps out to the disgruntled troops awaiting demob in Germany and Austria, promising that if they were elected the process would be accelerated? Answer, the same party that lost the next election, thereby proving that you can fool some of the people...

Doesn't really prove anything though does it. Proves that not all of the UK electorate was in the army at the time, but we already knew that.
 
let me give you a little lesson in counting

1: 1945
View attachment 152586
2: 1950
View attachment 152588
do you see how the labour party's vote did not decline, as you suggested, but rather went up by more than 1.2 million? perhaps you could also explain how a party with a majority of five seats lost the election

Apologies, it was the election after, in 1951. Churchill was PM in 1952 when I was born.

United Kingdom general election, 1951
50px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png

1950 25 October 1951 1955
outgoing members
elected members
All 625 seats in the House of Commons
313 seats needed for a majority

Opinion polls
Turnout 82.6%,
11px-Decrease2.svg.png
1.3%

Leader Winston Churchill Clement Attlee Clement Davies
Party Conservative Labour Liberal
Leader since 9 October 1940 25 October 1935 2 August 1945
Leader's seat Woodford Walthamstow West Montgomeryshire
Last election 298 seats, 43.4% 315 seats, 46.1% 9 seats, 9.1%
Seats won 321 295 6
Seat change
11px-Increase2.svg.png
23
11px-Decrease2.svg.png
20
11px-Decrease2.svg.png
3
Popular vote 13,717,851 13,948,385 730,546
Percentage 48.0% 48.8% 2.5%
Swing
11px-Increase2.svg.png
4.6%
11px-Increase2.svg.png
2.7%
11px-Decrease2.svg.png
6.6%

Colours denote the winning party—as shown in § Results
Prime Minister before election
Clement Attlee
Labour

Appointed Prime Minister
Winston Churchill
Conservative

The 1951 United Kingdom general election was held twenty months after the 1950 general election, which the Labour Party had won with a slim majority of just five seats. The Labour government called a snap election for Thursday 25 October 1951 hoping to increase their parliamentary majority. However, despite winning the popular vote, Labour were defeated by the Conservative Party who had won the most seats. This election marked the beginning of the Labour Party's thirteen-year spell in opposition, and the return of Winston Churchill as Prime Minister. Also, this was the final general election to be held with George VI as monarch; as he died the following year on 6 February, and was succeeded by his daughter, Elizabeth II.
 
A new referendum on Brexit should be held if Theresa May is replaced as prime minister and no general election is called, says Wales's First Minister. Carwyn Jones has so far said he would only support a new Brexit vote if a general election were held and the result failed to break the deadlock.
:thumbs:
 
Can you think of anything with 'people's...' in front of it that isn't patronising as fuck? If it was really the people as a whole doing something, then everyone would know this already and you wouldn't need 'people' in the title of the thing. It's like putting 'water' in the name of a boating event, if you're doing it properly then the presence of water should at the very least be strongly implied.

Come out and say 'the people fucked up' if that's what you believe. If the problem first time round was people lying, twisting facts, presenting opinion as fact, lying about their motivations and generally communicating with the public in a disrespectful way, then the solution is unlikely to require more of the same.


The "People's Will" didn't patronise the Tsarist elites. They assasinated them.

Narodnaya Volya - Wikipedia

Narodnaya_Volya
 
Can you think of anything with 'people's...' in front of it that isn't patronising as fuck? If it was really the people as a whole doing something, then everyone would know this already and you wouldn't need 'people' in the title of the thing. It's like putting 'water' in the name of a boating event, if you're doing it properly then the presence of water should at the very least be strongly implied.

Come out and say 'the people fucked up' if that's what you believe. If the problem first time round was people lying, twisting facts, presenting opinion as fact, lying about their motivations and generally communicating with the public in a disrespectful way, then the solution is unlikely to require more of the same.
people's palace
people's front page
 
This way of thinking fucks me right off. It really does.

The “British guy”? Why is that relevant? His title and CV tells us more: Lord Kerr of Kinlochard, formerly one of the directors of Royal Dutch Shell, currently deputy chairman of Scottish Power.

So let’s try that again:

The privately educated, Oxbridge Lord and company director who wrote article 50. Yes, him.


Or more succinctly:

The perfidious Scot who wrote Article 50.
 
Back
Top Bottom