Supine
Newt Member
No.
Negotiating a proper and orderly withdrawal from the EU was not an impossible task. Impossible within a two year time-frame, yes, but who said it had to be done in two years?
The British guy who wrote article 50
No.
Negotiating a proper and orderly withdrawal from the EU was not an impossible task. Impossible within a two year time-frame, yes, but who said it had to be done in two years?
The one who wrote it in order to make sure that no one could ever really imagine leaving due to the shitty nature of the process. And who has since been going around urging a stop to brexit. Yes, this is how the EU operates.The British guy who wrote article 50
The above look like some reasonable predictions in circumstances where any predictions are guesswork essentially.
I share other posters' queasiness about a second referendum, it can so easily look like, and even be, taking the piss out of some of the electorate -- "Get it right this time, you twats!" -- as no remainer would be stupid enough to say out loud/too obviously in any new campaign
OTOH, Brexit as currently being royally fucked up by the Tories, would IMO be disastrous. As I said before, Brexit and related stuff are, to most normal people, intrinsically dull-as-ditchwater subjects that the Tories have been banging on about for far to long and to zero positive effect.
There was a Guardian op-ed piece the other day, I may find link some other time, where Rafael Baer (yes, I know!) summed up how bored most are by now quite well : Brexut minded people just want to get on with it, Remain minded people just wish it would all go away. I agree with him there actually, however contentious most of his other political stuff is.
This way of thinking fucks me right off. It really does.The British guy who wrote article 50
What, he insisted that May invoke article 50 before Britain had worked out its own negotiating positions?The British guy who wrote article 50
What, he insisted that May invoke article 50 before Britain had worked out its own negotiating positions?
(FWIW I am a staunch Remainer but am not in favour of a 2nd ref)
I would have thought a staunch Remainer would be in favour of a 2nd Referendum
What I wrote is that nobody said we had to do it all in two years. You were the one that interpreted that as meaning wholly post article 50.I answered what you wrote which is not this question...
On this question I think it was idiotic to trigger it without having a clue what the end point and strategy were.
The Tories are committed to brexit, there's no way they can offer up a 2nd ref.Yes it has a lot of heft - so much so that many leftie-liberals are falling into line behind them without bothering to ask serious questions about a whole range of things - simply because it may get the result that they want. That's a total abandonment of political responsibility. To flop sleater's insistent whining on here about a tory brexit, this is to argue for a tory remain.
The labour stuff i think is 150 motions, which can represent as little as 150 very busy people.
So what about a labour brexit? Because it ain't labour or tories you really care about is it? It's brexit. You'd happily swallow a tory remain. Do you remember the official tory govt remain position before the referendum? Why are you insisting that they are now believe in leave?The Tories are committed to brexit, there's no way they can offer up a 2nd ref.
Labour on the other hand could, and would get a few concessions from the EU on stuff like public ownership etc.
What would the question be?The Tories are committed to brexit, there's no way they can offer up a 2nd ref.
Labour on the other hand could, and would get a few concessions from the EU on stuff like public ownership etc.
I care about both, but I see brexit as damaging whoever is in charge.So what about a labour brexit? Because it ain't labour or tories you really care about is it? It's brexit. You'd happily swallow a tory remain. Do you remember the official tory govt remain position before the referendum? Why are you insisting that they are now believe in leave?
Lectern's out in Downing St. for a May statement in 25m. BBC cameras only. Anyone taking bets? Chequers blinkers on? No Deal? GE?
Extension?Lectern's out in Downing St. for a May statement in 25m. BBC cameras only. Anyone taking bets? Chequers blinkers on? No Deal? GE?
Seriously, the historical party of british capital - british capital which is massively behind remain and pulling all sorts of strings under the rubric of the people - could never fall in line with that groups understanding of its self-interest?I care about both, but I see brexit as damaging whoever is in charge.
May has had lots of trouble getting chequers through, never mind remain.
of the E meowLarry the Cat being appointed chief negotiator
Lectern's out in Downing St. for a May statement in 25m. BBC cameras only. Anyone taking bets? Chequers blinkers on? No Deal? GE?
Lectern's out in Downing St. for a May statement in 25m. BBC cameras only. Anyone taking bets? Chequers blinkers on? No Deal? GE?
Choose betweenWhat would the question be?
Face-saving bullshit is the favouriteLectern's out in Downing St. for a May statement in 25m. BBC cameras only. Anyone taking bets? Chequers blinkers on? No Deal? GE?
let me be clear
In good faith
the will of the british people
blah blah fucking blah
Pah where is your spirit of adventure... Heading off into the great unknown with just a colour scheme to guide you...I answered what you wrote which is not this question...
On this question I think it was idiotic to trigger it without having a clue what the end point and strategy were.