So anyway, you’re not going to answer my question obviously so I’m going to try and explain to you the general reasons that Indy voters(a third of them, as far as we can tell from polling) voted leave- People who took comparisons to Norway further than just “they are cool and Scandinavian” and thought about Norway’s relationship with the EU, the benefits of EFTA as opposed to full membership etc. People that argued we weren’t voting for independence because we think Scottish politicians are better than English ones, but rather because the whole country needs a break from the status quo or to “break the lockjam” as put by the one SSP candidate that got his deposit back in the Highlands, John Aberdein(who like Carmichael after him really fucking utilised the power of the Weel Kent Face!!- /a very Scottish derail). The idea that vote Yes wasn’t just for the Scottish working class, but that it would trigger real change for working class people all over Britain- indeed many of us welcomed the news that English folks were asking for more devolution after the Indy ref- though we were in fairness drowned out by Yes voters slagging off the English for the same, I guess that schism just became more prominent after brexit. People that really got into thinking critically about our relationship with local and national government and the value of making sure the people we need to challenge are a bit closer to home during Indy- people who took the idea of civic nationalism and ran with it, and applied it to our relationship with the EU as well as Westminster.
I heard stuff like “the status quo is crumbling” again and again from fellow leave voters. Aidan Moffat for example suggested he couldn’t understand the logic of voting remain if you were pro Indy in the week prior to the vote, though it appears he bottled it since then and has been mostly saying we need to stop Brexit.
So this is what the character of Yes/Leave was as far as I can tell, drawn from every Yes voter that’s ever spoken to me about it and a few remain- with- nose- held types as well. it’s not about cutting people loose any more than Yes was about hating the English. I was as honest as possible about my family members that voted leave- , this is what I’ve heard from Yes voters that voted leave, I honestly don’t have another story to tell at present anyway!
I’m not intelligent enough to really say how relevant all of the above is, but that’s where people seemed to be going and I’ll always say it was the Yes campaign that ultimate led me to vote Leave, if Indy hadn’t had happened I probably wouldn’t have even given the Brexit vote much of a thought- that and helping house refugees here in Orkney and being a one person aid effort on this wee isle, I can’t put an X next to a statement suggesting I support the EU given the responsibility they have for the refugee crisis and deaths in the med- this minor responsibility is pretty much the one thing I’ve been able to do politically in years being a care worker and a single mum, time constraints etc so while we are on the subject of me not giving a shit about anyone outside of the U.K. I was “giving a shit” about that long before I considered the Brexit question so I’m pretty fucking sure I’m not being dishonest here at all. I’ve put a fair amount of energy into giving a shit about what happens in the med, if I’m not doing enough it’s cause I’m not really sure how to do any better, without contributing to stuff that’s probably ultimately harmful like those Trump picnics- in fact carework is also what I’ve been doing in the event of not being sure how to be of use politically cause the left always gave me the dry heaves from a young age- though I could never confidently critique it. How to be practically of use, in some way? That’s pretty much my motivation behind anything, so again going back to the “break the lockjam” argument. And I don’t think that’s niche, you only have to look at the increased turnout for both refs to see that a lot of people might be a fair bit more interested in actually answering questions than they are in choosing between different representatives of the same shite. And for comparison look at the US, Trump won when the turnout was 50 per cent or thereabouts. Yet Trump/Brexit are so often mentioned in the same breath- Yes, I know there’s a rump section of the leave vote you can compare to the Trump phenomenon, and we’ve seen how much trouble they can cause after the sickening rise in racist attacks post Brexit. But where did all these “new voters” come from? If they were so enamoured by the promises of Nigel Farage, why did they not back UKIP before? And why was UKIP not the next logical step at the subsequent GE to ensure THE DEMANDS OF VOTE LEAVE were met? Why the fuck did the one party that stuck doggedly to the Vote Leave manifesto see a massive crash in their polling after Brexit? Your simplistic analysis of recent events just doesn’t add up.
And I’m calling you out cause I think your shite is harmful for the Yes movement too. Wonderful Scots trying to get away from racist English? Why would you do this? Line up behind project fear like that, like you don’t care how low you sink. Is the Yes movement really so fucking fragile that we have to get behind soft remain voting Tories now? It’s not just you though, it’s everywhere I look up here. I am fucking sick of it, and the Scottish left in general. Don’t trust them. If I seem particularly angry at you, it’s unfortunate as the Scottish Left isn’t massive on urban!
I could have just as easily abstained from the Brexit vote, I didn’t know until the day what I would do- I’ve never felt strongly affiliated to any party or movement, or “Lexit” so... “my lot”- it’s just fucking people. That’s about as specific as I can get. The working class, whether they agree with me or not, that old cliche, aye.
I’m a bit nervous about posting this illiterate shite but here goes