Supine
Newt Member
Today I visited a country that is not in The customs union with the EU, yet has an open border with the EU.
Oohhh. I do like a good quiz
Today I visited a country that is not in The customs union with the EU, yet has an open border with the EU.
Today I visited a country that is not in The customs union with the EU, yet has an open border with the EU.
Today I visited a country that is not in The customs union with the EU, yet has an open border with the EU.
your mistress in Lichtenstein?
HahahaaToday I visited a country that is not in The customs union with the EU, yet has an open border with the EU.
pearls before swine etcI’m a bit nervous about posting this illiterate shite but here goes
The Vatican?
I'm not finding the answer but reading about small place like andorra, leictenstein (sic) etc is interesting in terms of our potential future relationship with Europe. Makes a change from the bog standard Norway / Canada models that are normally discussed.
Did you nick any pope on a rope from the hotel?Yep.
Strange isn't it!Witchcraft.
That's because if they closed the borders the border zone would consume all of San MarinoSee also, San Marino. Not in the EU, no free movement, no customs union, yet open borders.
Witchcraft.
Or it could be that they're insignificant.
microstates are fascinating. Still more so no-spaces, non states. The existence in the interstices. This one always interested me Kowloon Walled City - WikipediaI'm not finding the answer but reading about small place like andorra, leictenstein (sic) etc is interesting in terms of our potential future relationship with Europe. Makes a change from the bog standard Norway / Canada models that are normally discussed.
Is the Vatican going to swamp us with cheap exports?.So the fundamentals of the EU can be ignored, if the country is deemed insignificant?
And in sleaterkinney’s world the Holy See lacks significance.
Not illiterate at all mate. Really good post.I’m a bit nervous about posting this illiterate shite but here goes
This is overly simplistic on both sides of the equation. A large %, possibly a majority, of the UKIP vote went to the Tories in 2017 but certainly not all of it. ~Likewise while the pre-2015 UKIP vote was drawn strongly former Con voters there was a significant proportion, ~50%, that wasn't. 1,2.I didn't make any simplistic analyses though...and UKIP all went back to the tories where they were hatched...job done.
So basically people don't tend to be exposed to critical thinking or are'nt encouraged/taught to think critically, so they don't. Unless they are people like us.this is very basic sociology. how can you have a free vote while there are large corporations, while there is an imbalance of power within society? if people working at humirax ltd are told that if labour win then their jobs might be at risk, do you not think a few of them might vote tory? then there's the role of information, knowledge famously being power. most people do not seek out information, whether because they don't know they're ill informed or because they haven't the time or the knowledge of how to or 1001 other reasons. you can't make an informed electorate, you can only give people the opportunity to become informed.
I take it you've been exposed to thinking. Yet you don't engage critically with what's said to you. If you can't or won't engage critically with things here, I am not sure why you think you'll be able to elsewhere.So basically people don't tend to be exposed to critical thinking or are'nt encouraged/taught to think critically, so they don't. Unless they are people like us.
I know it's bad manners posting links to twitter but, would be interested to hear what people here think of the reasoning in this thread. Lots of what he says (and is arguing against) reminds me of things i've read on here since the referendum.
(you have to click on it to read the whole thing obvs)
Did you nick any pope on a rope from the hotel?
Which one?No pope on a rope, nor pope’s dope. But did see the tomb of Pope Urban