not-bono-ever
meh
you know we will still (we* being the republic of Ireland) be part of the Schengen Agreement
does Eire have to pat to patrol the border
does eire exist ?
/pedant
you know we will still (we* being the republic of Ireland) be part of the Schengen Agreement
does Eire have to pat to patrol the border
RoI isn't in the Schengen Areayou know we will still (we* being the republic of Ireland) be part of the Schengen Agreement
does Eire have to pat to patrol the border
it's stamped on my passport
England
Remains to be seen, tbf.It is not just England that is leaving the EU.
its off the thread topic but slight related if their is no hard border between the eu and England
who is responsible for policing it in the 2 state policy of Ireland
agriculture businesses are already seeing shortages in the UK..
Noyou know we will still (we* being the republic of Ireland) be part of the Schengen Agreement
does Eire have to pat to patrol the border
New topic.
The two key social structures that seem to most grant prosperity to the people of a nation are (1) as democratic a political structure as possible; and (2) the ability for individuals to directly prosper as a result of their own labour rather than their labour being abstracted by rent seekers. It seems to me that both these structures are undermined for Britain by her being within the EU. The first is hopefully clear enough not to need much justification. The second is because the EU smooths the path for multinationals to trample the little guy.
Do you have a wider framework in mind here? In a world of limited resources, international governance is also necessary. Regarding climate change, various other environmental issues, scientific research, etc, etc, international cooperation is the only thing that can save us, and that requires international institutions. You may not think the EU is the right international institution but something like it needs to be there, for things ranging far more widely than just trade.Democracy means transparency, accountability, the ability for representation to translate into action, direct access to the levers of change. These could be a fuckton better in the UK but I’m surprised that anybody could suggest they are better within the EU.
Do you have a wider framework in mind here? In a world of limited resources, international governance is also necessary. Regarding climate change, various other environmental issues, scientific research, etc, etc, international cooperation is the only thing that can save us, and that requires international institutions. You may not think the EU is the right international institution but something like it needs to be there, for things ranging far more widely than just trade.
More generally, devolved democratic accountability is good, mostly better, but only with something above it to avoid tyranny at the local level. I'm not really a good anarchist any more as I can see the need for local street committees to have their powers limited (and guaranteed) by a local council, which has its powers limited by a national government, which has its powers limited by international institutions. As you go up the levels, democratic accountability can become harder. Is that a reason for withdrawal? Does the UK become more democratic with fewer international limits on it? Or does the danger of tyranny at a national level increase? For many countries with living memory of national tyranny - Portugal, Spain, Greece, former Warsaw-pact - joining the EU was seen as, and does genuinely act as, a means of limiting the possibilities of national tyranny. I think people in the UK can be rather complacent in this regard.
Really?Democracy means transparency, accountability, the ability for representation to translate into action, direct access to the levers of change. These could be a fuckton better in the UK but I’m surprised that anybody could suggest they are better within the EU.
New topic.
The two key social structures that seem to most grant prosperity to the people of a nation are (1) as democratic a political structure as possible; and (2) the ability for individuals to directly prosper as a result of their own labour rather than their labour being abstracted by rent seekers. It seems to me that both these structures are undermined for Britain by her being within the EU. The first is hopefully clear enough not to need much justification. The second is because the EU smooths the path for multinationals to trample the little guy.
For what?...Art 50 extension please
It's not always easy to distinguish the opinion of an urbanite from an extended quote from Nigel Farage. Which is this?His back
It is now beyond doubt that the political class in Westminster and many of their media allies do not accept the EU referendum result. They refuse to acknowledge the wishes of the majority of those who took part in that historic plebiscite of 2016 by voting to leave the European Union. As far as I’m concerned, this is the worst case of Stockholm syndrome ever recorded.
It is equally clear to me that, unless challenged, these anti-democrats will succeed in frustrating the result. Whatever they may claim publicly, this is their ultimate objective. They think nothing of betraying the citizens of Britain.
For months now we have heard the same argument from this bunch: “Leave voters did not know what blah blah.
It's not always easy to distinguish the opinion of an urbanite from an extended quote from Nigel Farage. Which is this?