littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
In what way could it be wrong? If all concerned agree it can be revoked, it can be revoked.Well, some think that Article 50 can be revoked. But, supposing that is wrong,.
In what way could it be wrong? If all concerned agree it can be revoked, it can be revoked.Well, some think that Article 50 can be revoked. But, supposing that is wrong,.
Do you think it’s likely that Labour can force an extension to Article 50?
In what way could it be wrong? If all concerned agree it can be revoked, it can be revoked.
Agreed. Don’t think that affects the (no) deal with the EU though.
Sure, but the point is that any technicalities can be overcome if there is the will to do it. There is no precedent, and a lot of hot air is spoken by all sides about what may or may not be possible. Politically, I would say that it would be impossible for the rest of the EU to refuse to cancel brexit if the UK were to request such a thing, whatever the rules might say. There have been some rather fanciful ideas posited about various penalties that they would try to impose, but I don't see how any of that would be possible. I'm not saying brexit won't happen. I have my doubts, but I have no idea - nobody does - but I am saying that it could not happen very easily if the UK were to want it not to happen. The rest of the EU doesn't want brexit, after all.I sort of agree, but I've also spotted an "if" in there. I'm not sure about the technicalities, but I would say a revocation has to be unilateral.
Sure, but the point is that any technicalities can be overcome if there is the will to do it. There is no precedent, and a lot of hot air is spoken by all sides about what may or may not be possible. Politically, I would say that it would be impossible for the rest of the EU to refuse to cancel brexit if the UK were to request such a thing, whatever the rules might say. There have been some rather fanciful ideas posited about various penalties that they would try to impose, but I don't see how any of that would be possible. I'm not saying brexit won't happen. I have my doubts, but I have no idea - nobody does - but I am saying that it could not happen very easily if the UK were to want it not to happen. The rest of the EU doesn't want brexit, after all.
Though...The pendulum seems to have swung back the past few days as it has become apparent to the EU fuckos that May’s fragility isn’t such a good thing for them, if she was to go and be replaced by that Johnson cunt it would be hard Brexit and that means Merkel & Macron have to tell their voters that they need to cough up a lot more dough.
.
This just about allows Johnson's vassals in the tory party to portray May as almost the creature of the EU, clinging on with the support of Junker, Merkel et al. However I still can't see them replacing her in the short term. Just adds to the shit sloshing around the party and further weakens May.The most revealing statement made today was a Tweet by Juncker’s chief of staff, the German lawyer Martin Selmayr, that he and Juncker have “no interest in weakening PM” ...
As it happens I have been told repeatedly and reliably that Merkel in particular regards the prospect of Johnson becoming prime minister, and therefore her counterpart in Brexit talks, with the relish that most of us would feel if presented with a plate of steaming sick.
And the knee-jerk Tweet from Selmayr, who is close to Merkel - when accused by May’s former aide NickTimothy of being the leaker - more or less confirmed that.
If I was in the unfortunate position of being in charge, here's what I reckon I'd do:
- Get a proposed set of terms, whatever is available quickly, present it as best we'll be offered
- Put it to the nation as a Yes/No vote, where No is ambiguous but in theory means back to the Brexit drawing board rather than explicitly rejecting whole thing
- Repeat Remainers plus greedy Brexiteers surely means it's a No (although we all know how these gambles go)
- Blame everyone else
- Call another election, probably lose but at least lose as the democratic party that tried
- Leave the 'WTF now' to the even more unfortunate replacement
- ???
- Profit
Both. It doesn't necessarily have to be final and binding, just a skeleton of a plan within the parameters of the now-possible. Plus some details like a figure for the bill to pay, etc, enough to be able to say 'this needs to be put to the public'.Do you mean terms for the eventual relationship, or terms for the interim relationship? Neither are available quickly, except perhaps for Norway+ (EFTA/EEA + comprehensive customs agreement).
You're David Cameron aren't you?If I was in the unfortunate position of being in charge, here's what I reckon I'd do:
- Get a proposed set of terms, whatever is available quickly, present it as best we'll be offered
- Put it to the nation as a Yes/No vote, where No is ambiguous but in theory means back to the Brexit drawing board rather than explicitly rejecting whole thing
- Repeat Remainers plus greedy Brexiteers surely means it's a No (although we all know how these gambles go)
- Blame everyone else
- Call another election, probably lose but at least lose as the democratic party that tried
- Leave the 'WTF now' to the even more unfortunate replacement
- ???
- Profit
I suppose it is pretty much the same plan, but mine's new and improved: instead of presenting an alluring dream that people will unexpectedly vote for, simply offer up a plate of shit and then go home early when noone wants to eat it.You're David Cameron aren't you?
I suppose it is pretty much the same plan, but mine's new and improved: instead of presenting an alluring dream that people will unexpectedly vote for, simply offer up a plate of shit and then go home early when noone wants to eat it.
Funny you say that. I've spent a lot of time in Germany over the last couple of decades and one constant standing joke the Germans like to reel out at every opportunity to us Brits, is the one about the quality of our breakfasts: 'How could you eat such a fatty pile of unhealthy shit?', 'beans for breakfast, you'll be farting all day...', 'musli is so much healthier than than your englisch shit!', 'it's a plate of shit..!' etc.But, as Cameron found out, one man's plate of shit is what half the country fancies for breakfast. Metaphorically speaking.
I suppose it is pretty much the same plan, but mine's new and improved: instead of presenting an alluring dream that people will unexpectedly vote for, simply offer up a plate of shit and then go home early when noone wants to eat it.
There in lies the rub; nothing beats a British breakfast...... If someone else is cooking it
I'm glad you've no chance of being in charge then, you sound too much like the Tories.
Except he has some sort of plan.
A plate of shit is a plate of shit.
you doNow who sounds like a Tory?
Michael Bloomberg breaks cover and states the bleedin' obvious Michael Bloomberg: Brexit is stupidest thing any country has done besides Trump
Bloomberg argued that “it is really hard to understand why a country that was doing so well wanted to ruin it”
And clearly not for millions of others either. But there were many people who pushed for and voted Brexit that were already doing very nicely thank you, who did so for ideological reasons, and many did so in order to cash in on it themselves with scant regard for the millions who'd inevitably lose out - Arron Banks being one such example.Not for me it wasn't