stethoscope
Well-Known Member
Hopefully not the same Ireland that voted against the Lisbon Treaty
Still, keep running referendum's until the 'right' result is achieved!
Hopefully not the same Ireland that voted against the Lisbon Treaty
Yet the problem with the Irish border is turning out to be something brexiters ought to have had front and centre of their thinking, because without a solution brexiters are not going to get brexit.
Concessions got them there in the end. The government want concessions on brexit but are laughed at by the usual suspects.Hopefully not the same Ireland that voted against the Lisbon Treaty
The UK as an institution are party to an international agreement regarding Ireland, so if they care about the future of the UK they should be concerned about the UK living up to the agreement they signed.But why should the average British voter care about Ireland's future? I assuming they are concerned about the future of the UK and anything else is very secondary.
The UK as an institution are party to an international agreement regarding Ireland, so if they care about the future of the UK they should be concerned about the UK living up to the agreement they signed.
Indeed, implicit in somebody asking you for your preference in a decision is the understanding that once you have expressed your preference, the person asking has a way of making it workable. Otherwise, it's a false choice. It's pure pass-agg, in fact.Ah, but that's the UK govt as opposed to the average voter who went out (rightly or wrongly) and cast their vote on June 23rd. I'm pretty sure that Ireland,her borders and her turbulent relationship with Britain were far, far from voters thoughts.
If the UK government didn't have a way of making one of those options workable in practice, they shouldn't have asked the question.
So there shouldnt have been a referendum because its difficult to enact one of the options?Indeed, implicit in somebody asking you for your preference in a decision is the understanding that once you have expressed your preference, the person asking has a way of making it workable. Otherwise, it's a false choice. It's pure pass-agg, in fact.
The UK government asked the UK people whether they would prefer to be in or out of the EU. If the UK government didn't have a way of making one of those options workable in practice, they shouldn't have asked the question. You can't blame people for stating a preference when they are asked for one, based on whatever factors are important to them at the time.
So there shouldnt have been a referendum because its difficult to enact one of the options?
The referendum was called on the assumption that there was only one possible outcome. This is not a sensible or a democratic way to behave.
Why is the EU like the Hotel California?
No, silly, because you can vote 'Out' any time you want, but you can never Leave, according to some on this thread.Warm smell of colitas?
also no matter how you stab it with your steelen knives, you just can't kill the beastNo, silly, because you can vote 'Out' any time you want, but you can never Leave, according to some on this thread.
That as well, obviouslyalso no matter how you stab it with your steelen knives, you just can't kill the beast
You tell me. Is there a meaningful pathway to leaving the EU or not? If not, why the fuck were we asked the question? If so, why is it the voter's fault if the government fuck up that pathway?So there shouldnt have been a referendum because its difficult to enact one of the options?
... the UK living up to the agreement they signed.
Wouldnt that entail showing the potential hand youd have even before the necessary negotiations began? What makes you think that Cameron thought that there was only one potential outcome?Or maybe the groundwork on what exactly leaving the EU would entail and what would need to happen for it to be workable should have been done before any referendum, not after it or (as the current plan seems to be) never.
The referendum was called on the assumption that there was only one possible outcome. This is not a sensible or a democratic way to behave.
I was asking you the question as thats what I thought your post implied.You tell me. Is there a meaningful pathway to leaving the EU or not? If not, why the fuck were we asked the question? If so, why is it the voter's fault if the government fuck up that pathway?
And now what do you think?I was asking you the question as thats what I thought your post implied.
i think that the complexity of the negotiations and the stance of the EU over Ireland reinforces the view of how monolithic the EU has become.And now what do you think?
Yet the problem with the Irish border is turning out to be something brexiters ought to have had front and centre of their thinking, because without a solution brexiters are not going to get brexit.
no more red telephone boxesspain are going to do their best to bagsy the rock as well. Presumably with the EU's blessing, like the crushing of catalonia
Wouldnt that entail showing the potential hand youd have even before the necessary negotiations began? What makes you think that Cameron thought that there was only one potential outcome?
They're being removed on a daily basisno more red telephone boxes
So there should have been more questions on the referendum voting paper?The type of discussions we are having now (about the Irish border for example) could and should have been had before the referendum. Outlining the options (in/out SM; in/out CU) and the implications wouldn’t have revealed the UK’s hand. It would however have forced politicians to be straight with the public about the trade-offs.
It should have been but wasn't because Cameron didn't believe Leave would win, all this crap is because he wanted to stop his own backbenchers from stabbing him in the back, it descends further into chaos every day because Mayhem doesn't have the will or the strength to control her own party and puts preserving Tory Party unity above all else.The type of discussions we are having now (about the Irish border for example) could and should have been had before the referendum. Outlining the options (in/out SM; in/out CU) and the implications wouldn’t have revealed the UK’s hand. It would however have forced politicians to be straight with the public about the trade-offs.