He means UK should be given until end of implementation period in December 2020 to find backstop workaround while still leaving with a deal at end of October, not that there should be a 15 month extension.
In truth, Lord Pannick is seeking to heal the Brexit divide. In addition to his work in London he also has chambers in the Irish capital as well as his practice on the Firth of Tay. He's even tried to take the law to the Brexit wilds of one of those unitary authorities in the East Riding. I think he also works with Lord Carlisle.Only just got it thanks to your post, doh.
When is the fucking Supreme Court going to come to a verdict?
In truth, Lord Pannick is seeking to heal the Brexit divide. In addition to his work in London he also has chambers in the Irish capital as well as his practice on the Firth of Tay. He's even tried to take the law to the Brexit wilds of one of those unitary authorities in the East Riding. I think he also works with Lord Carlisle.
expected tomorrowWhen is the fucking Supreme Court going to come to a verdict?
To be honest, the world won't listen.I don't think you can necessarily heal in a court room what is at is culmination of rights multilateral agreement vs unliteral dissent (both within the Nations of the UK and wider European Union. But has certainly helped moved forward agenda for future tweaking devolved settlement.
Also interesting to see that at EUropean level the humiliation the UK had over Spitenkandidaten would have gone the UK's way this time
When is the fucking Supreme Court going to come to a verdict?
Who cares?
To be honest, the world won't listen.
To be honest, the world won't listen.
What Difference Does It Make? surelyWho cares?
What Difference Does It Make? surely
I am so glad I am not a lawyer. Watching the Supreme Court on telly and I am literally falling asleep.
You should be recording it for those nights of intolerable insomniaI am so glad I am not a lawyer. Watching the Supreme Court on telly and I am literally falling asleep.
I'm assuming that if SC finds against Johnson he'll just wave his hands, make a sound like someone shaking out a rubber glove and ignore it somehow
And if the pm ignores the sc why should anyone pay greater heed to lower courts?That seems to be what will happen.
And if the pm ignores the sc why should anyone pay greater heed to lower courts?
Jo Swinson looked lovely tonight
Jo Swinson said:the Liberal Democrats would like to have a referendum on the major issue of whether we are in or out of Europe.
I am so glad I am not a lawyer. Watching the Supreme Court on telly and I am literally falling asleep.
When is the fucking Supreme Court going to come to a verdict?
And chickens.I'm still processing the fact we have a supreme court. Calling serious organs of state 'supreme' is childish behaviour only suitable for americans. Well, americans and daleks.
What's this "brexit" thing you mention? i presume it is some kind of portmanteau word?Today I looked at government advice for operating post Brexit if you want to travel to the EU and ship products there. I can only describe it as many many steps backward. I like the single market and what it meant for people who wanted to do business with and travel in Europe. It will become a lot more complicated after Brexit that is for sure.
The simple answer is "no"This thread now has over a million views and there's still no answer to the question...