Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hungry Kidderminster woman stole Mars bars after benefit sanctions left her with no money for food

According to that article this is all down to Grayling wanting the courts to 'pay for themselves'. They have no leeway with the fines though I imagine there's more than one or two who are indifferent to the plight of individuals.
 
I wonder what will happen. Obviously anyone on benefits or on a lowish wage will not have a spare £300 ish just lying around and if they did, might not be nicking chocolate or BABY MILK for god's sake in first place.

I'm wondering if this is one thing that will embarrass this government into climbing down on it. But maybe they're beyond embarrassment, beyond empathy, beyond sense.

Hell, why did I write "maybe"? Seriously, this is crazy and wicked. :eek::mad:

I daresay the next case will be someone nicking one potato, or one packet of 25pence instant noodles. :(
 
I wonder what will happen. Obviously anyone on benefits or on a lowish wage will not have a spare £300 ish just lying around and if they did, might not be nicking chocolate or BABY MILK for god's sake in first place.

I'm wondering if this is one thing that will embarrass this government into climbing down on it. But maybe they're beyond embarrassment, beyond empathy, beyond sense.

Hell, why did I write "maybe"? Seriously, this is crazy and wicked. :eek::mad:

I daresay the next case will be someone nicking one potato, or one packet of 25pence instant noodles. :(
At least we don't have the three strikes rule they have in parts of the usa that has seen people jailed for stealing stuff like this, as it was their third offence.
 
I wonder what will happen. Obviously anyone on benefits or on a lowish wage will not have a spare £300 ish just lying around and if they did, might not be nicking chocolate or BABY MILK for god's sake in first place.

I'm wondering if this is one thing that will embarrass this government into climbing down on it. But maybe they're beyond embarrassment, beyond empathy, beyond sense.

Hell, why did I write "maybe"? Seriously, this is crazy and wicked. :eek::mad:

I daresay the next case will be someone nicking one potato, or one packet of 25pence instant noodles. :(
So I wonder what will happen in the long run? There must be magistrates who find this objectionable - will they start "nullifying" by making not guilty findings? It's probably too much to hope for that the police might stop sending such cases to the courts, but is it possible that shops might hesitate, knowing that the bad PR resulting from cases like this might rebound on them?

Or maybe this will simply run its course, and we will start to see ever increasing numbers of people being sent to prison for non-payment of "fines". We really are giving more and more people the freedom of having nothing left to lose...you have to wonder when the riots are going to start.
 
DotCommunist Private Storm J Ed

A 33-year-old homeless man pleaded guilty to three counts of breaching a criminal behaviour order after he was found holding “an open container of alcohol”. Magistrates in Folkestone, Kent, sentenced him to 12 weeks in prison, suspended for 12 months, and ordered him to pay a £185 criminal courts charge, £85 costs and a £100 victim surcharge. (Folkestone Herald, 14 July 2015)
.


It's like reading this Victorian Crime & Punishment archive. And with Minister's promising boot camps for the unemployed how far away are we from the return of the work house...
 
So I wonder what will happen in the long run? There must be magistrates who find this objectionable - will they start "nullifying" by making not guilty findings? It's probably too much to hope for that the police might stop sending such cases to the courts, but is it possible that shops might hesitate, knowing that the bad PR resulting from cases like this might rebound on them?

Magistrates can't over-turn sentences. Only the Court of Appeal can. What magistrates could do, is make the payment order for an insignificant monthly sum (say £2).

Or maybe this will simply run its course, and we will start to see ever increasing numbers of people being sent to prison for non-payment of "fines". We really are giving more and more people the freedom of having nothing left to lose...you have to wonder when the riots are going to start.

Most of this shit lies at that the feet of that ferret-faced, dead-eyed cock blister Chris Grayling, who decided to institute a quasi-compulsory fines system in order "to make the courts pay for themselves", without paying any attention to the fact of further indebtedness resulting from failure to pay, and the increased possibility of a custodial sentence for non-payment somewhere down the line.
 
According to that article this is all down to Grayling wanting the courts to 'pay for themselves'. They have no leeway with the fines though I imagine there's more than one or two who are indifferent to the plight of individuals.


Actually, there was a major SKY News report on the court case fees, magistrates are resigning in significant numbers over the lack of autonomy over fines, etc.
 
I don't understand how any hungry person can be found guilty for nicking food. they are acting under extreme duress. Hunger drives people to do all kinds of shit they wouldn't do under better circumstances.
 
Back
Top Bottom