I have a few questions:
Why is Lord A suing now when;
-he was named before by others and did not sue them? (Icke and Scallywag)
-he had a lawyer during Waterhouse, but says he was surprised to be named now?
Also: Just a reminder to be mindful of the stuff that we are reading on the net and what impact it may have on us. I read an account a week ago of the sexual abuse of a young girl, amongst other things, which I can't get out of my head. I will go as far as to say it has disturbed me greatly.
Toby young sneered at some Twitter person raising concerns at this 'art' collection. School founder Toby young, yes.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/282958/Malcolm-King-s-terror-as-perv-sex-ring-cuts-brakes/
THE whistle-blower who exposed the Welsh children’s home sex abuse scandal has cheated death in a suspect car smash after his brakes failed.
Police have seized care boss Malcolm King’s motor to see if it was sabotaged.
I think you are missing a h from the name of the new age astral magic wibbler. What were you referring to anyway, the Machiavellian stuff?
ANDREW MARR: There was a lot of talk back in the Eighties and Nineties about sleaze and how the Labour Party was going to clean up the system of donations to political parties and yet you look at the last few days and some people would say it's dirtier than ever.
Person who we shouldn't talk about 'cos he's innocent - The Eighties, the sleaze wasn't just money - it was sexual and every sort of sleaze that anyone could lay their hands on.
William of Walworth said:Utter Tory Toby Young, yes.
I'm sure not all Tories are programmed to react like this, but the stupider ones must be ...
Anyone else get the sense this is all running out of steam?
A job well done it seems.
Not been on there for a few days. Relevant hashtags?Dunno. Could all blow up in a different way if all the stuff on Twitter is to be believed
Not been on there for a few days. Relevant hashtags?
Are you on about the same stuff as before Minnie, with some people who reckon they are in the know making allegations about a victim or two?
Anyone else get the sense this is all running out of steam?
I was thinking exactly that this afternoon. I'm a bit bemused that nothing has come from the discovered copies of the Jillings reports - the Independent has one and some of the councils said they 'found' their copies, yet I haven't seen anything at all reported about the contents. Does anyone know whether it's because there is nothing new, or it's being suppressed or because the paper is investigating people named?
Cheers. It is ugly, not terribly surprising, and I'm mostly trying not to pay too much attention to it. I'm not sure about it blowing up though.
I suspect many journalists wont want to touch either side of that story. It's a minefield and its far from clear what good will come from it, or what agendas could effectively be served by it without unnecessary risk of it backfiring.
Definitely not my site, I only have two: www.borderland.co.uk and www.borderlandmagazine.co.uk. All other sites that might appear to be me are not.Are you sure about that?
An extra bit on Cyril Smith (apologies if already covered, I haven't been on here for a couple of days). I was in Rochdale at the weekend and the Rochdale Observer is running a story linking him to abuse at Knowl View Special School (school for kids with, I think, emotional and learning difficulties). OBserver's site with related stories:
http://menmedia.co.uk/rochdaleobserver/news/
Specific one:
http://menmedia.co.uk/rochdaleobser...l-smith-abused-boys-at-second-rochdale-school
He was chair of governors at the school and had keys made for all of the dormitories. That is, someone who everyone knew had been investigated by the police for child abuse was given 24/7 access to vulnerable children - in their bedrooms. The School has featured in previous abuse allegations and was closed down in the 90s. Apparently one of the workers there complained to police about the abuse of children - inc. Smith. I don't know the details, but nothing at all seems to have been done about Smith's part in it - and this was in the 90s - a time when child protection policies were pretty much in place (at least the arrangements and awareness around child abuse were closer to the present than the 1960s). The worker who complained - yes, you've guessed it, made redundant after the closure.
Sorry, I'm not much of a source on this. Rochdale Observer went mad on Smith this week - first 9 or 10 pages or so. I skimmed the first few pages and there was reference to a known paedo having access, other than Smith, so you are no doubt right in relation to the piece quoted. He did though, apparently, have access to the dorms.I'm not saying Cyril wasn't involved, but I doubt he's the paedo mentioned.
I remember "town bogs" opposite the black box in Rochdale being notorious as a rent boy haunt - Most of them were probably from Knowl View. Poor souls.
BBC Radio Manchester @bbcradiomanc
The CPS says it's found a file relating to late MP for Rochdale Sir Cyril Smith dating from the 1960s. It DOES contain allegations of abuse
Rochdale's MP has called for an inquiry into the role of MI5 in a potential "cover-up" of alleged abuse by former MP Cyril Smith in the 1960s.
Speaking in Parliament, Simon Danczuk also asked why the case was dropped, against advice, by prosecutors.
An inquiry must "get to the bottom of what several former police officers are now referring to as a cover up", he said.
Mr Danczuk said files from a Lancashire Police investigation in the 1960s, which the force had been unable to find, had now been uncovered by the Crown Prosecution Service.
He asked: "Can the home secretary now look at whether it's true the director of public prosecutions at the time received a second opinion recommending Smith be prosecuted, and why he concluded it was not in the public interest?
He also asked for an inquiry into "what role, if any, security services played".