Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?

Gordon Anglesea was a Chief Superintendent who was cleared of abuse. He was allegedly also a mason. He was named as someone had visited Bryn Estyn. He took libel action and won several hundred thousand pounds IIRC.
no alleged about him being a mason, it's on the record in the public inquiry report.
 
Gordon Anglesea was a Chief Superintendent who was cleared of abuse. He was allegedly also a mason. He was named as someone had visited Bryn Estyn. He took libel action and won several hundred thousand pounds IIRC.
Thanks BM. :) That certainly puts a rather different angle on Messham alluding to possibly blowing the whistle on him.

So much has been written by so many that it's hard to quickly pick out who's who if you've not time to read through it all in detail.
 
Gordon Anglesea was a Chief Superintendent who was cleared of abuse. He was allegedly also a mason. He was named as someone had visited Bryn Estyn. He took libel action and won several hundred thousand pounds IIRC.

You realise we're talking about a different Anglesey

(Well I am!)
 
Thanks BM. :) That certainly puts a rather different angle on Messham alluding to possibly blowing the whistle on him.

So much has been written by so many that it's hard to quickly pick out who's who if you've not time to read through it all in detail.

huh? Is this a different one? :confused:
 
pm sent. As it's so new i presume Google hasn't indexed the page.

Other names (other than Macalpine) are mentioned so id rather not post the link.
 
A name is surfacing in relation to having kept notes of interviews. This lady.
All of this stuff linking her to saville et al is very recently posted because when I did a search a while ago for this name I could only find reference to her arrest and 'rumour' or her being in the Ecuadorian Embassy. Proof of that is on the Assange thread because I asked about her there.

Why? :/
 
Because most of the sites that go on about her are pretty dubious, her history is dubious, and I cant find anything of useful substance she has said about these sex abuse cases.
 
worth a read

I didnt like that article to be honest. It's probably clutching at some unproductive straws, although I dont mean that absolutely every point they make is shit. Some are though, but I think I've already covered them with my excessive quantity of posts on this thread over the last few weeks.

I still want to hear more about the dead Peter Morrison and exactly how he is supposed to have been patched into the paedophile network in question. I want to know more about the London visits that the victim interviewed on Sky talked about (and I mean new details, investigations and journalistic endeavours, not a mere reheat of stuff that came from Scallywag). I want to know more about the Righton stuff, and the Cyril Smith file. And whatever else is out there that has been overlooked due to the narrow focus on certain north wales things.
 
I still want to hear more about the dead Peter Morrison and exactly how he is supposed to have been patched into the paedophile network in question. I want to know more about the London visits that the victim interviewed on Sky talked about (and I mean new details, investigations and journalistic endeavours, not a mere reheat of stuff that came from Scallywag). I want to know more about the Righton stuff, and the Cyril Smith file. And whatever else is out there that has been overlooked due to the narrow focus on certain north wales things.
I want to know more about this 'mistaken identity'. If it wasn't AM (which it wasn't m'lud), then who the hell was it? A theory was put forward even before the AM claim was debunked, but seems to have disappeared into the long grass...
 
Well for that to happen I think more victims are required to provide new detail, or something else to be uncovered. Because whats out there already, even when removing the distracting mistaken identity stuff, is not good enough for a story to be told about that, at least not from what I've read.

Thats why I am expressing little interest at this point, if something new comes out then I'm all ears.
 
The Original Scallwag magazine is now online - im not sure if it's wise to link to it given the names it names....suggestions?
If anyone wanted to find that Scallywag article it really wouldn't be difficult to locate that article from Scallywag, using very obvious search terms to find that particular article from that particular Scallywag.
 
Lord McAlpine accepted a massive donation from Asil Nadir and then backtracked on it. I've been reading some news articles on Lexis Nexus and it seems Nadir was on the point of exposing how the Tories raised their funds.
 
Don't judge a book by the bookshelf.

Because the site only hosted a reproduction of the article then OK Scallywag's/the article's credibility or lack of it can still be judged on their own terms.

But fact remains that the host site, and its editor/some of its contributors, are just bound to shout 'conspiracy obsessives' at any passing visitor ..
 
Back
Top Bottom