Supine
Newt Member
Johnson's more interested in building bridges, although not necessarily metaphorical ones.
He’s shit at that as well
Johnson's more interested in building bridges, although not necessarily metaphorical ones.
Yeah. He sort of sets out to build literal bridges, but they always end up being a metaphor for something or other.He’s shit at that as well
by all out war i suppose you mean something like the great patriotic war. i agree, losses of 27,000,000 or more wouldn't sit well with the russian people. but if it's a smaller war and limited only to ukraine and - most importantly - putin wins quickly, then it would be rather differentPutin is not stupid. He doesn't want a war in Europe. He wants the Ukraine because he is obsessed with it as mother of the Rus... Biden has called him on it. Putin has lost face now. He has to back down unless he has completely lost his marbles. He knows he will not have the backing of the Russian people to go to all out war.
if you were putin he wouldn't be in the spot he is nowPutin could send in troops to the breakaway Russian republics and formally annexe them, same as he did in Crimea. No resistance. Maybe no fighting. No loss of face.
Invading Ukraine proper would involve conflict with another army and, if successful, years and years of guerilla war.
If I was Putin I'd do the former.
(Actually, if I was Putin i'd have a nervous breakdown)
Supreme power might not bring out my best attributes.if you were putin he wouldn't be in the spot he is now
misunderstood what i was saying - namely that Tory war talk isnt relevant because as Kaka Tim and others have said, the UK is small fry diplomaticallyyeh there's no way that this conflict in a far-off land of which we know nothing is ever going to impact us back here in blighty
by all out war i suppose you mean something like the great patriotic war. i agree, losses of 27,000,000 or more wouldn't sit well with the russian people. but if it's a smaller war and limited only to ukraine and - most importantly - putin wins quickly, then it would be rather different
misunderstood what i was saying - namely that Tory war talk isnt relevant because as Kaka Tim and others have said, the UK is small fry diplomatically
we've done this already - if you cant see how claiming that Putin is on track to rebuild teh Soviet Union and invade Balkans and Baltic states is talking up war then theres no point us talking to each otherHow do you define this "talking-up" war you've been going on about? What is it exactly and what do you believe is its purpose?
we've done this already - if you cant see how claiming that Putin is on track to rebuild teh Soviet Union and invade Balkans and Baltic states is talking up war then theres no point us talking to each other
And then judge the Tories by that benchamrk
tory war talk is very relevant to us becoming embroiled in whatever happens next. perhaps the uk no longer wields the diplomatic weight is once did. but you often hear about the uk punching above its weight militarily, tory images of their own manhood depend upon this.misunderstood what i was saying - namely that Tory war talk isnt relevant because as Kaka Tim and others have said, the UK is small fry diplomatically
he'll be along in a moment to tell you you've misunderstoodJust define "talking up war". Help me out.
What does it mean?
the way things are going with china any respite now would simply be a breathing space before The Big One with xi jinpingThe "west " will do what it does... impose sanctions and supply weapons to Ukraine. And millions of Ukrainians will suffer.
It's one thing for Putin to invade Ukraine and drag it back under Russian control, but how far will Europe and the west actually go to stop him? If Europe is pulled into a war with Russia then we can all just kiss our asses goodbye.
talking about vp rebuilding the ussr is ignorant twaddlewe've done this already - if you cant see how claiming that Putin is on track to rebuild teh Soviet Union and invade Balkans and Baltic states is talking up war then theres no point us talking to each other
The question is What does de-escalation and a diplomatic solution look like? How would that be achieved?
And then judge the Tories by that benchamrk
NoSo it's a Tory thing?
Weren't you saying that Biden was at it too?
Aka the government linetalking about vp rebuilding the ussr is ignorant twaddle
i'd expect nothing more from themAka the government line
Agree...were talking about what's happening now thoughtory war talk is very relevant to us becoming embroiled in whatever happens next. perhaps the uk no longer wields the diplomatic weight is once did. but you often hear about the uk punching above its weight militarily, tory images of their own manhood depend upon this.
yeh the government talking about arming ukrainian insurgents: which is rather beyond commitments under the budapest memorandum on security assuranceAgree...were talking about what's happening now though
How do you define this "Tory, talking-up" war you've been going on about that Boris and Biden (famously not a Tory) have been engaged in? What is it exactly and what do you believe is its purpose?
i won't take anything about the lesson of the last hundred years from someone who thinks hitler won at stalingrad10th Feb
"The PM said the continent stands at the “most dangerous point” since World War Two owing to Vladimir Putin’s build-up of troops and tanks threatening Ukraine."
And he told the Polish..
"The lesson of the last 100 years is that when Poland is threatened with instability, or aggression on the borders of Poland, then we are all threatened and we’re all affected.”
Boris effectively comparing Putin to Hitler. Bound to help matters eh?
And again from 10th Feb..
“This is probably the most dangerous moment, "I would say in the course of the next few days, in what is the biggest security crisis that Europe has faced for decades.
"We’ve got to get it right. The stakes are very high.”
Back om 10th Feb..
"A thousand British troops are now on standby for an invasion on top of the 350 Royal Marines on their way to Poland for joint Arctic warfare drills.
The UK has also offered to send warships and RAF jets, on top of 900 troops in Estonia as part of a Nato deterrence mission.
Russia also faces financial consequences, with Foreign Office minister James Cleverly confirming laws for crippling sanctions had been signed in readiness.
All done without any parliamentary debate?
10th Feb
"The PM said the continent stands at the “most dangerous point” since World War Two owing to Vladimir Putin’s build-up of troops and tanks threatening Ukraine."
And he told the Polish..
"The lesson of the last 100 years is that when Poland is threatened with instability, or aggression on the borders of Poland, then we are all threatened and we’re all affected.”
Boris effectively comparing Putin to Hitler. Bound to help matters eh?
And again from 10th Feb..
“This is probably the most dangerous moment, "I would say in the course of the next few days, in what is the biggest security crisis that Europe has faced for decades.
"We’ve got to get it right. The stakes are very high.”
Back om 10th Feb..
"A thousand British troops are now on standby for an invasion on top of the 350 Royal Marines on their way to Poland for joint Arctic warfare drills.
The UK has also offered to send warships and RAF jets, on top of 900 troops in Estonia as part of a Nato deterrence mission.
Russia also faces financial consequences, with Foreign Office minister James Cleverly confirming laws for crippling sanctions had been signed in readiness.
All done without any parliamentary debate?
That's examples of statements. You're not answering the question though.
In what way are those statements "talking up war"?
What is the intention of this "talking up war", in your view?