goldenecitrone
post tenebras lux
Just play them this.
I don't remember it lasting as long as the 1990s, not on any widespread basis anyway, but my memory might be shifting a few years. It was mainly railway stations to start with wasn't it?then how did the 'ra find bins to drop bombs in in the '90s? Hell, there were bins on the tube till the '90s before they brought in the transparent bags at above ground stations.
oh yeh bomb at victoria killed on iirc w/o the benefit of your link. And a bomb in camden in I believe '92 and one at harrods.I don't remember it lasting as long as the 1990s, not on any widespread basis anyway, but my memory might be shifting a few years. It was mainly railway stations to start with wasn't it?
E2A: this says it was a bomb at Victoria in 1991 which started the railway station thing. No citation, but it would fit OK with my hazy memories. I'd been using trains enough by then to notice when it changed, but I'm surprised it was that late.
It's very good.I'm very proud to say the bloke who did that is my mate!
This is the least important reason in the world to hate her. It's an utter irrelevancy. And it implies that women should be judged by their parenting skills, in a way that men rarely are.Margret Thatcher
Was not a good mother.
Fact.
"every prime minister should have a willie"say what you like about margaret thatcher, she had a fantastic penis.
Yes, very much so, her remedy for the problems we faced made things better for a minority in the short run, and much, much worse for all but a fortunate few in the long runI didn't live through those times in Britain; but do people think that the country would be in better shape if she'd never been PM? [nor anyone like her who did the same things?]
oh gawd, not this old one....workers strike as a last resort Johnny, what you saw was workers standing up for themselves and fighting for their rights. And if that causes inconvenience for a few - tough. It takes two to tango, so why not ask how much management were to blame?My recollection of Britain pre-Thatcher was a visit for a couple of weeks in approx. 1980. I was astonished at how dysfunctional the place seemed to be - so many different types of worker were on strike. Something was affected or compromised every day. The final insult to injury was, the airport arrival/departure flipper board sign workers were on strike - so it was a big scramble to find out when and where my plane would be.
It had problems, but as I said she made things far, far worse.We lost 30% of our manufacturing capacity during her time, the main reason why we have such a badly unbalanced economy now. We have no home owned steel industry, coal industry, car industry or domestically owned power generation.She may well have been overly zealous and draconian; but for those old enough to remember, didn't it seem to you like the country was headed for the rocks back then?
It's very good.
This is the least important reason in the world to hate her. It's an utter irrelevancy. And it implies that women should be judged by their parenting skills, in a way that men rarely are.
i took you to mean a native of where the philistines lived round palestine.A philistine person is the man or woman who is smugly narrow of mind and of conventionalmorality whose materialistic views and tastes indicate a lack of and indifference to cultural and æsthetic values.[
Plus, also Labour simply had too big a mountain to climb that year1987 SDP-Lib alliance and Kinnock 'rebuilding' in preparation for Blair, plus a mini economic boom
It's not about Thatcher but it is about Thatcherism and it will certainly encourage your teenager to hate it! http://feela.co.uk
Yes, but the question was why, given the horrors of Thatcher. The SDP-Lib alliance was the primary reason, AFAIK.Plus, also Labour simply had too big a mountain to climb that year
Plus, also Labour simply had too big a mountain to climb that year
oh right, yes it was, but I meant 1983 was such a catastrophe that it took Labour a decade to recoverYes, but the question was why, given the horrors of Thatcher. The SDP-Lib alliance was the primary reason, AFAIK.
This is the least important reason in the world to hate her. It's an utter irrelevancy. And it implies that women should be judged by their parenting skills, in a way that men rarely are.
There's no need for this line of counter-argument, if that is what it is intended as. Her children are horrible people and I feel no sympathy for their loss, only contempt that they didn't disown her. Their feelings are a stupid argument for holding back from the partying, let alone from making the political points that might get some airtime for a change (and for which the parties are useful space-making devices).
I wasn't very clear, but that is what my second paragraph is supposed to mean. You don't have to criticise her parenting skills to refute the "think of her family" shit.It's relevant to all the "think of her family in these sad times" stuff. Her family don't seem to have been fond of her at all, and I don't blame them. Have Mark or Carol put out any statements at all?
Excellent.Btw, I am reading all the responses and will bring some of them up with my daughter. Fortunately she asked why Thatcher was so bad, so I can give her a one-sided answer with a clear conscience.
i saw a headline in the substandard (I think) yesterday with petronella wyatt going on about how thatcher was like a mother to her.
I didn't live through those times in Britain; but do people think that the country would be in better shape if she'd never been PM? [nor anyone like her who did the same things?]
My recollection of Britain pre-Thatcher was a visit for a couple of weeks in approx. 1980. I was astonished at how dysfunctional the place seemed to be - so many different types of worker were on strike. Something was affected or compromised every day. The final insult to injury was, the airport arrival/departure flipper board sign workers were on strike - so it was a big scramble to find out when and where my plane would be.
She may well have been overly zealous and draconian; but for those old enough to remember, didn't it seem to you like the country was headed for the rocks back then?
Looks like she was elected in 1979; the miner's strike apparently was in 84? I was there in 1980.
I don't think Thatcher had taken many if any of her steps to curtail union power etc in 1980; it's similar to Reagan who was elected in 1980, but didn't fire PATCO until 1981.
What I saw was Britain before Thatcher's drastic changes were implemented.
She almost immediately provoked/encouraged a massive steel strike that lasted 4 bitterly fought months - and in that same early period attempted to push through a raft of mine closures. She got working straight away.
So you're forgetting the old bailey, the tower of london, the parachute regiment barracks, the shooting (sorry no bomb) of ross mcwhirter, guildford and birmingham, among others.