Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hammersmith Bridge closed to motor vehicles "indefinitely"

I'm no engineer but stabilising the bridge sounds like a temporary measure. The council will fund the initial £6 million in anticipation of reclaiming the cost..............yeah, right.
 
It does sound a bit like kicking the can down the road for some other administration to deal with in 10-20 years

What I don't get is why the whole thing cannot be taken down and then rebuilt to be aesthetically the same (using the same design/parts where possible etc) but with foundations and structural stability to last well into the next century. I get the whole Grade 2 listed etc, but I'm also sure it's not outside the realms of civil engineering these days.
 
It does sound a bit like kicking the can down the road for some other administration to deal with in 10-20 years

What I don't get is why the whole thing cannot be taken down and then rebuilt to be aesthetically the same (using the same design/parts where possible etc) but with foundations and structural stability to last well into the next century. I get the whole Grade 2 listed etc, but I'm also sure it's not outside the realms of civil engineering these days.
simple. Cost. Plus locals wouldnt wait that long.
 
Here's an unexpected idea:

View attachment 241131

" Plans have been shown off that could reopen the Hammersmith Bridge, by slotting in a temporary double-decker road inside the existing structure.


Developed by the engineers COWI and architects, Foster + Partners, the idea would be to get the closed bridge open again for traffic, while supporting the bridge during renovation works.

The lower deck would be for pedestrians and cyclists, while an upper deck may be able to carry cars, although that’s not confirmed at the moment. The proposals would also need long approach ramps for the motor vehicles to be able to rise up from street level to the upper deck. The argument for putting the road vehicles above seems to be so that the pedestrian area can also be reused in sections for the bridge repair works to be carried out.

There would be no load added to the existing bridge deck which could then be removed in stages and taken away for repair. They suggest that removal and repair is quicker and cheaper than trying to repair broken parts on site.

Initial estimates suggest the temporary crossing would allow the strengthening and stabilisation works to the bridge to be completed at a cost lower than the current £141million estimate."

As an aside, how the fuck can a bridge repair cost £141 million?

Looks like this is actually going to happen
 
Slightly off topic. Swarkstone is a superb listed medieval bridge. It's very narrow and drivers have been spooked by it and have needed rescuing from it. The way around it is a huge detour. I suggested a modern bridge nearby to overcome the issues...


Haunted bridges have no place being in the transport infrastructure, knock it down.
 
The lack of updates concern me.
It doesn't surprise me. Nobody knows what to do with the quaint but useless assembly of junk.
As to this pod idea, why do they need ten pods when only one can be on the bridge at a time?
 
What’s a pod?
8d377660-eb1b-11ed-a142-ab0e42bfd9c3.jpg

That green thing.
cb91cb00-eb1a-11ed-a142-ab0e42bfd9c3.jpg


The only reason I can think that they would need 10 of them is that it takes only a couple of minutes to cross the bridge and about 10 minutes wanted to load/unload at each end (that's not the proper word for passengers is it?). That way you can have one running across whilst the other 9 load or unload at each end and wait their turn?
I guess you need to account for times when one or two are out of service.
 
Back
Top Bottom