Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Greek elections

Thats really interesting - can a member state of the eurozone start printing euros, without the ECBs approval? Seems like a good back up/short-term plan if pushed to it... that really would piss the troika off!
Mad. If the greeks just ran off euros willy-nilly surly some intervention from outside would be needed before it brings down the worlds financial system.

I'm seeing Luftwaffe bombs dropping on the greek mint
 
It'd be extremely amusing to see their faces if Lapavitsas was named to replace Varoufakis :D
Its going to be a good week for photographers in general to catch some choice body language :thumbs:
Bring forth the Lapavitsas!
Syriza have done the good cop routine - nothing to lose by sending in someone a bit badder now. Necessary even
 
Mad. If the greeks just ran off euros willy-nilly surly some intervention from outside would be needed before it brings down the worlds financial system.

I'm seeing Luftwaffe bombs dropping on the greek mint
well it depends how much you have to print before it sends the wider economy that much off kilter - if the irish were allowed to print all those billions I cant see what harm another 50billion would do :)
 
well it depends how much you have to print before it sends the wider economy that much off kilter - if the irish were allowed to print all those billions I cant see what harm another 50billion would do :)
From what I understand of the article the difference was that the ecb weren't in a standoff situation (capping funds) with the irish at the time. So I guess it was more of a bi-lateral decision with some knowledge from the ecb as to the capacity they could print before forex markets were put at risk.
It sounds mad to me that the greeks could to it now without any ecb oversight.
 
Last edited:
They clearly need a bit of quantitative easement :). I'm also surprised they haven't taken a page from the old Tory book of a windfall tax.
 
From what I understand of the article the difference was that the ecb weren't in a standoff situation (capping funds) with the irish at the time. So I guess it was more of a bi-lateral decision with some knowledge from the ecb as to the capacity they could print before forex markets were put at risk.
It sounds mad to me that the greeks could to it now without any ecb oversight.
Last week there were threats from Syriza that Greece would fight for its legal right to remain within the eurozone - "The EU treaties make no provision for euro exit and we refuse to accept it. Our membership is not negotiable." ... perhaps there's a potential for greece to go independent within the union, bypassing the EuroCentralBank, and printing greek euros rather than drachmas!? Seems very unlikely but fun to think about
 
The Economist suggesting scrip 'a monetary trick sometimes used in such emergencies—issuing temporary IOUs, or “scrip”, in lieu of cash' - used most recently in Argentina after the 2001 default, (alongside the more radical credito barter system).

I can’t see how a scrip currency could work. It would have to be printed and distributed - no easy task. It would also have to be printed to the same security standards as the Euro to prevent forgery.

When it was issued there would have to be some sort of conversion rate set between what is essentially an IOU and the Euro - good luck with that.

Then when enough Drachmas had been printed the same process would have to happen again.

People would have to have confidence in the scrip currency - that’s certainly not guaranteed. Indeed, if I was a shopkeeper and I was offered a Euro or some form of IOU I would always opt for the Euro.

While the rich will always have access to Euros, the poor would more than likely have to rely on scrip when their Euros ran out. This would mean they would be at the back of the queue when buying goods and services.

In such circumstances a scrip currency would be a recipe for economic, political and social disaster. There would be the real risk of a breakdown of civil society if large sections of the population were unable to buy basic foodstuffs.

The Euro is an internationally tradeable currency. The scrip would be practically worthless outside Greece, even if it had any value inside the country, which is highly debatable. It would be practically impossible for Greece to import anything of value.

There seems little point in issuing a scrip currency. The Greeks might as well move to the Drachma directly.

One way out of the problem is for the ECB to continue emergency funding of the Greek banks to ensure liquidity while capital controls remain in force. The economy would continue to run on the Euro, for the time being at least.

In the meantime, every EU country (as well as the US and Canada etc) agrees to print as many Drachmas as fast as they can so Greece could revert to its original currency as soon as possible, or at least have the capacity to do so.
 
Analysis - Czechoslovakia: a currency split that worked

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/12/08/uk-eurozone-lessons-czechoslovakia-idUKTRE7B717G20111208


The split was announced on February 2. The two countries already had capital controls, but all cross-border money transfers between them were halted to avoid further speculative flows into the Czech Republic. Border controls were tightened.

Komercni Banka, a then state-owned commercial bank, glued stamps, printed by a British firm to ensure secrecy, on 150 million federal banknotes. These were trucked around the country with the help of police and the army.

The exchange for notes stamped by Czech or Slovak stamps, at a 1:1 rate, started on February 8 and was completed in four days. Later in 1993, the stamped notes were replaced by new ones.

People could swap a maximum of 4,000 crowns -- then worth $136 (87 pounds) -- in cash. They had to deposit the rest. The old money ceased to be valid immediately the switch started.

Capital controls were essential to stop bank runs. Secrecy in the buildup was paramount.

"Distrust in the monetary setup, devaluation speculation by importers, exporters and banks led to a quick depletion of foreign reserves in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," wrote Pavel Kysilka, who led the Czech separation team.

This was made worse by money flows from Slovakia into the Czech Republic. Slovakia had a hard time at first but ultimately became a poster child for reform and qualified for the euro before its neighbour.

After contracting 3.7 percent in 1993, Slovakia's economy grew in 1994. Trade between Slovakia and the Czech Republic recovered after a 25 percent drop in 1993 and trade with the European Union grew. The Slovak currency devalued by 10 percent in mid-1993 and remained weaker than the Czech crown until Slovakia's euro entry in 2009.
 
I won't put this in the political polling thread...very different circumstances and all that....but. not a good year for the pollsters.

 
I bet the bland, grey apparatchiks of Europe's financial ministries hated having a stylish, likeable and charismatic human being in their presence.
I suspect it was none of those qualities or attributes that contributed to his removal, rather his inability to see the emperor's new clothing.
 
Analysis - Czechoslovakia: a currency split that worked

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/12/08/uk-eurozone-lessons-czechoslovakia-idUKTRE7B717G20111208


The split was announced on February 2. The two countries already had capital controls, but all cross-border money transfers between them were halted to avoid further speculative flows into the Czech Republic. Border controls were tightened.

Komercni Banka, a then state-owned commercial bank, glued stamps, printed by a British firm to ensure secrecy, on 150 million federal banknotes. These were trucked around the country with the help of police and the army.

The exchange for notes stamped by Czech or Slovak stamps, at a 1:1 rate, started on February 8 and was completed in four days. Later in 1993, the stamped notes were replaced by new ones.

People could swap a maximum of 4,000 crowns -- then worth $136 (87 pounds) -- in cash. They had to deposit the rest. The old money ceased to be valid immediately the switch started.

Capital controls were essential to stop bank runs. Secrecy in the buildup was paramount.

"Distrust in the monetary setup, devaluation speculation by importers, exporters and banks led to a quick depletion of foreign reserves in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," wrote Pavel Kysilka, who led the Czech separation team.

This was made worse by money flows from Slovakia into the Czech Republic. Slovakia had a hard time at first but ultimately became a poster child for reform and qualified for the euro before its neighbour.

After contracting 3.7 percent in 1993, Slovakia's economy grew in 1994. Trade between Slovakia and the Czech Republic recovered after a 25 percent drop in 1993 and trade with the European Union grew. The Slovak currency devalued by 10 percent in mid-1993 and remained weaker than the Czech crown until Slovakia's euro entry in 2009.


One of the key differences in the above case is that the existing currency ceased to have any value once the switch took place.

This would not be the case with the introduction of a Scrip. [ETA - should have read Scrip rather than Drachma as in orginal. Sorry].

The existing currency, in this case the Euro, would still have value.

Arguably the Euro would have, and will continue to have, far greater value than the currency replacing it.
 
Last edited:
Time now for Merkel to sideline Schäuble. While she's at it, also tell Lagarde to stay out of further negotiations (the IMF can dance at another table for their owed money).
 
One of the key differences in the above case is that the existing currency ceased to have any value once the switch took place.

This would not be the case with the reintroduction of the Drachma.

The existing currency, in this case the Euro, would still have value.

Arguably the Euro would have, and will continue to have, far greater value than the currency replacing it.
No the scrip would be 1 scrip = 1euro, not a floating rate. The state of California did just this in 2008.
 
Ska Invicta made a good point earlier bout ideology, left party gaining a foothold in EU etc.

Also will be interesting to see ideological hold of `neo-liberalism` on EU member states/EU commission/ECB...will they have a bankrupt, even-more-fucked Greece still inside EU (surely generating net costs to other 27 member states) or will they be forced to back down?

Also, BBC saying `markets down` etc. The FTSE as i write is down 1pc, Nikkei was down what? 2pc? Not huge moves. Euro has strengthened vs sterling, BBC says it has fallen...

Even if Greece exited euro `markets` would lend it money. Some fund/bank would still take a punt, might even see returns as better now other debts wiped out...

Economic journalism is really shit a lot of the time.
 
No not quite same - timeframe more succinct - but scrips (there are others...Czech republic??Slovaks when split occurred iirc) have precedent. Not a floating rate currency.

It's not like writing it in biro on a post-it...i have loads of them anyone here can buy, PM me send cash ;)


ETA - how badly has Merkel misjudged this all along from 2010. And Hollande, the fucking waste of space prick...jesus christ he's like buffoon number 1.
 
Has a replacement for Yanis been announced? The Paul Mason piece linked to was from April....

(re 51billion QE in irleand) Fucking hell how did I miss that. I really do live in a banana republic.
I think the UK has had about 40bn quantiative easing too, so, you know, we're all in it together
 
No the scrip would be 1 scrip = 1euro, not a floating rate. The state of California did just this in 2008.

Sorry - I’m not sure I follow. What did California do in 2008?

In any case I’m not sure the Greek population (or anyone else for that matter) would accept replacing an internationally traded hard currency with potentially worthless funny-money on a 1:1 basis. I certainly wouldn't.

For a whole host of reasons I can’t see how this would work.

In such circumstances, pretty much everyone who could would continue using the Euro no matter what the Greek Government says or does.
 
No not quite same - timeframe more succinct - but scrips (there are others...Czech republic??Slovaks when split occurred iirc) have precedent. Not a floating rate currency.

It's not like writing it in biro on a post-it...i have loads of them anyone here can buy, PM me send cash ;)


ETA - how badly has Merkel misjudged this all along from 2010. And Hollande, the fucking waste of space prick...jesus christ he's like buffoon number 1.
In the great depression they were often written on clamshells, bits of wood, old car tires etc
 
I won't put this in the political polling thread...very different circumstances and all that....but. not a good year for the pollsters.


though reporting the yes vote as bigger than it was would only have the effect of encouraging out the no vote, no? Theres nothing to be gained by manipulating the No vote down, is there?
 
Analysis - Czechoslovakia: a currency split that worked

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/12/08/uk-eurozone-lessons-czechoslovakia-idUKTRE7B717G20111208


The split was announced on February 2. The two countries already had capital controls, but all cross-border money transfers between them were halted to avoid further speculative flows into the Czech Republic. Border controls were tightened.

Komercni Banka, a then state-owned commercial bank, glued stamps, printed by a British firm to ensure secrecy, on 150 million federal banknotes. These were trucked around the country with the help of police and the army.

The exchange for notes stamped by Czech or Slovak stamps, at a 1:1 rate, started on February 8 and was completed in four days. Later in 1993, the stamped notes were replaced by new ones.

Different kettle of fish with the euro though, as it will continue to have value even after a split. They can't just invalidate it and start over, unless they were to invalidate it everywhere and replace every banknote in the eurozone, at a cost far greater than simply buying Greece a new Greece.
 
Back
Top Bottom